- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 30,398
Henderson flashed last year and I saw enough to know he was legit and would be a very good RB. I understood, however, the rationale for taking Akers and agree with it. They will provide a good rotation with both with similar skill sets so the offense doesn't change. I have always meant it when I said the Rams now have a two-headed monster at RB. A strong run attack is crucial to the success of this offense.
What I would like to see is the addition of a true FB next year so that O'Connell can use a power run game. They can use Mundt in that role now and don't understand why they don't. If McVay wants to still use his 11 personnel he can align one of his TE's as an H-back. The defense won't know if he's going to be a lead blocker on an inside run, stay in to pass protect or release into a pattern.
Against the Bears, it's imperative that the Rams run the ball.
There's no reason for us to add a FB unless we're getting a guy like Juszczyk, who is a weapon in the passing game (basically an undersized TE who can block). McVay sure doesn't seem to like 21 personnel all that much. He's still the guy who designs and calls the offense.
Why don't they use Mundt in that role? Why would they? They're running plenty effectively without a FB, and putting Mundt on the field means taking a better receiving talent off of it.