With all due respect, Cap, I don't agree.
The cap is certainly going to go up very soon, and quite possible quite a bit. As many have shared, the deals made recently will not look nearly as dire in 2-3 years.
With regards to Goff, I'd offer two things. First, it's very rare in sports that the best player at the position is paid the most for very long. By the nature of the timing of expiring contracts, teams have to make decisions that ultimately result in them paying more for a player than the best player at that position in the league is paid. By way of example, Wentz is paid more than Mahomes. There are many other examples.
This leads to the Goff extension. The guy took us to the last super bowl. We paid a boat load of draft capital to get him. It would have been nice if we didn't have to pay him top money, but that's simply not the reality of how it works. At the time he signed, very few of us would have preferred we let him walk. With hindsight, an argument could be made we should have waited another year. The very coach you credit/applaud in your post felt he was worth it. I trust him and his decision. It's a whole other conversation, but judging a super bowl quarterback 6 games into a season where his line sucks and his star RB is a shadow of his former self is unfair. Very few, if any, QB's in his situation would excel. Just my opinion.
The Gurley extension is fair game to criticize. I felt it was an absolute need to get him resigned, but was a bit hesitant of the timing (i.e. could have waited a year) and moreseo over the dollars spent. At the time, he was a top 3 RB who was still young and the backbone of team. Again, a must-sign. Did they rush the decision on a position that is certainly more replaceable than QB? Perhaps. But there is no denying the talent and it's easy to understand why they wanted him in the building.
I respectfully don't buy the "1st round pick is a must" to continue to find cheap labor. Look back at ANY draft over the past 10 years and you can cherry pick almost half of the players selected that didn't make a difference. NO GM strikes on all of them. For every Donald there is an Austin. For every Newsome there are far more Millens.
This leads to the Snead/Demoff comments. Regarding Demoff, I have absolutely no idea why you aren't a fan of his. I think he's managed the cap and contracts magnificently. His strategy of front loading the guarantees and allowing flexibility to get out later has been outstanding. We have yet to truly lose a player of strong value due entirely to being in cap hell. That day is likely coming in the next year or two with JJ, Kupp, Littleton, etc. coming due. But I think we have to understand that part of that is the benefit of having extremely elite talent on the roster currently. Those guys cost money. It's hard to have it both ways. Many fans out there root for teams with very few star players that don't spend all of their cap money. We are talented and should feel blessed.
Snead makes mistakes, for sure. ALL GM's do. But I appreciate that he makes them being aggressive be it in the draft or via trade. I love it. And I expect him to miss often because it's simply not easy. I'll take the Cooks trade if it means we're going to lose on the Peters trade, for example. A fan could literally pick from any GM in the league and say "I wish we had that guy as our GM" and we all could review his record of transactions and find many misses. In this regard, I'm unsure of what you are hoping for.
I stated this in the opening, but I believe the combination of McVay/Snead/Demoff are the best in our history. I'm not going to let a 3-3 start or even an underachieving season blur that body of work. I simply trust them more than any combo I have observed since my fandom began in '78.
Respectfully,
Wisconsinram