@Rams43 who is the FA you want, who is going to do more for this team than Trumaine? Rams didn't have any issues bringing in the FAs they were interested in, only one who got away I think was Garcon who the 9ers overpaid for pretty badly.
And yeah you're not the only one second guessing it, I'd say you're in the majority especially on Rams sites around the web.
I'm afraid that the FA market at CB ship has now already sailed, Merlin. Now it's become a moot point. Although Webster was a fine late catch.
I do believe that there were a few other opportunities early on. But as I say, the Tru tagging precluded pursuing them. Once they made that decision, the die were cast.
However, even if they had allowed Tru to walk without receiving any Ram compensation, what would have been the worst possible scenario? We would have used our #37 on a drafted rookie CB. Something that we are now highly likely to do, anyway.
See where I'm going with this? We are kinda chasing our tail with regard to the TruJo situation. Do we replace him THIS year? Or do we replace him NEXT year? And which long term strategy works best for the Rams while giving them the most control over their options? Emphasis long term...
I'll be honest, here. Part of my frustration comes from paying TruJo $16.7 million while he and his damned agent hold the Rams as cap hostage because he refuses to agree to a long term fair market contract loaded with guarantees. He's selfishly and foolishly hurting the team. That pisses me off. I mean, a LOT.
There. I said it.