I suppose my definition of bagging is different than others. Based on what I've seen from various parts of the country I've lived in and visited, this IS homer reporting. Really, what's he supposed to say? "They've looked awful so far, but don't worry cause they've looked worse?"
And how is a hometown reporter supposed to be "professional" and "somewhat of a homer" at the same time yet not acknowledge whatsoever the relocation or the ten years of futility? It's an impossible task ROD is setting here.
It's just a disconnect there for me I guess. You've got a second relocation in 20 years, ten of those years were not good for W/L. To me in this situation getting mad at the reporters for not reporting positively enough is as pointless as worrying about recycling in Ethiopia. From what I've seen they've included the things that have gone well in the first two games. And they've all mentioned it's early and it's preseason. It's not their fault that there's not much good to talk about SO FAR. If they want positive coverage from locals, if they want positive national media attention, at a certain point it's going to have to come from the football field first. It's Jeff Fisher's job to provide positive stories about the Rams, not the reporters. IMO.