Glennon Could Yield 3rd Round Pick

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
RamBill

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
ROD Credit 2025
0
Adam Caplan ‏@caplannfl

Feeling in league circles is that the Buccaneers, should they be willing to trade Glennon, would yield as high as a 3rd-round pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dieter the Brock
Before anyone gets up in arms (re: Bradford), just remember:

1) WAY better contract

2) Isn't seen as a one year rental

3) Has not had multiple season ending ACL injuries and surgeries

4) He is worth as high as a 3rd round pick, not a 3rd round pick. It could be a 5th, or a 4th, but not a 2nd. The pick is most likely conditional based on performance benchmarks.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: paceram, Elmgrovegnome and Legatron4
IMO they're both pretty equal in value once you add it all up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: V3
But he looks like Napolean Dynamite!
1837aee8d5547188988cd41efcd3531f.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Imperial and A55VA6
Irish said:
Before anyone gets up in arms (re: Bradford), just remember:

1) WAY better contract

2) Isn't seen as a one year rental

3) Has not had multiple season ending ACL injuries and surgeries

4) He is worth as high as a 3rd round pick, not a 3rd round pick. It could be a 5th, or a 4th, but not a 2nd. The pick is most likely conditional based on performance benchmarks.
Click to expand...

He's also a serviceable QB who we could WIN with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmgrovegnome and paceram
BigRamFan said:
A conditional 3rd next year? Sure, that sounds about right for a serviceable backup.
Click to expand...

If I was Tampa Bay I would prefer a third from next years draft over a third in this years draft, but don't picks. Lose around of value when they are a year removed? So, that would make the pick equal to a fourth this year.
 
Elmgrovegnome said:
If I was Tampa Bay I would prefer a third from next years draft over a third in this years draft, but don't picks. Lose around of value when they are a year removed? So, that would make the pick equal to a fourth this year.
Click to expand...
And if the decision were mine to be made, from a Rams perspective, I would offer no more than that.
 
Strange amount they're asking since they absolutely don't seem to like him at all given how much they've plugged him in and then yanked him back out of the starter's role. Tells me they don't value him much.

So why should other teams value him at a 3rd?
 
  • Like
Reactions: V3 and Yamahopper
Irish said:
Before anyone gets up in arms (re: Bradford), just remember:

1) WAY better contract

2) Isn't seen as a one year rental

3) Has not had multiple season ending ACL injuries and surgeries

4) He is worth as high as a 3rd round pick, not a 3rd round pick. It could be a 5th, or a 4th, but not a 2nd. The pick is most likely conditional based on performance benchmarks.
Click to expand...

I dunno Irish, my brother in law is a Buc's Fanatic and he doesn't really endorse Glennon.

But then again, lots of Rams fan's don't endorse Bradford, so yeah.
 
I've always wondered why a QB who couldn't start in Tampa is seen as a semi-jewel in a trade scenario...Obviously there could things I don'r see or know about, but I'm not real interested in him at almost any price...
 
  • Like
Reactions: blackbart
I'd give up a 3rd for him before I would waste a 3rd on any of the QBs in this draft, but would really like it if we could give them a 3rd next year as opposed to this year since we already dont have a 4th and a 6th. that would leave us with only 4 picks in the draft.
 
:Madden Moment: Trade them for Scott Wells and Davin Joseph plus a 6th.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back