Wilson 7/12 for 68 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs.
That's not very impressive either.
Wilson does not have a big arm, but Brees is one of the NFL's most prolific passers and he was really off his game in the first half.
Wilson 7/12 for 68 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs.
That's not very impressive either.
Wilson does not have a big arm, but Brees is one of the NFL's most prolific passers and he was really off his game in the first half.
Wilson is home with the greatest home field advantage in existence. He needs to be better than that.
BTW, Tony Softli said that Jake Matthews doesn't have a nasty streak. And thats a concern.
I think Wilson's success is predicated more on how well Lynch rushes. When the Rams have stopped Lynch, Wilson struggles. Granted, Lynch is doing well today. However, the Saints are explosive enough that Russell has to step it up himself.
Yeah, you definitely need a mean streak in the wild, wild NFC West. That's one of the reasons I think Robinson would be a better get.
Now I go back to Sneads BS statement. Name the Saints OL?
Not many people can, but they were the reason the Saints were able to pound the ball in on Seattle when we never could.
No way, dude. The reasons the Saints are in the game is because their defense has held Seattle to 16 points and are starting to pass the ball. Seattle starting to wear down a bit because Seattle offense can't keep a drive going. They're not stacking the box on Breese because he's way better than Clemens. Saints OL is as good as ours... no better.