I lied, one more post:
1) very thin/but defined line between aggressive play and stupid/undisciplined plays.
2) I love KC's guts and competitiveness but he is what he is, a backup QB. For those who think Bradford couldn't have done better then, whatever.......
3) Games come down to plays and playmakers. The main D and O playmakers didn't come through and the key plays were left on the field IMO
4) Young teams can have talent but if they don't deliver they are teases. They had the chance to make plays and failed.
5) The receivers (both Cook and Givens) seemed scared to me.
6)If you don't think we need DB help then again, whatever.
SF is who we want to be. They are better at being SF than we are. A team like SF, minus the bull shit efforts of CK and his alter-ego, will ALWAYS be in games. That is how we should aspire to be. Good running game, above average D, an O that can make plays when given the chance, and a lot of 4th quarter games to be won.
Right now the Rams need to decide who they are. IF they want to be SF-like then they need to decide if Bradford and the attached salary is the way to go. If NOT, load up on D and get a QB who can keep you in games and see how it plays out at the end.