Elmgrovegnome
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2013
- Messages
- 24,934
Like I said. You didn’t name any better options. In that case it’s just whining.Sounds like Santa Claus is out there. But hey we can ignore the rest.
Like I said. You didn’t name any better options. In that case it’s just whining.Sounds like Santa Claus is out there. But hey we can ignore the rest.
I remember reading that with Shelton in at Center, they were picking up almost a yard more per carry when they ran the ball inside than they did with Limmer.Shelton is a bit of a puzzle. It could be that Stafford is more comfortable with him. If he just anchors better, he could surprise.
My titties got in an uproar when we signed Reeder as well.Dude Calm your tits.
That seems to be the consensus Rams fans opinion. Yet in the 4 games Kupp and Puka missed last year, Tutu had more targets in each game than DRob.....by a lot (34 - 19 total). It could be said that's an indication of who was #3 and who was #4. On those targets, Atwell had 23 receptions for 332 yards while DRob had 9 for 156 yards, 1 TD. Now if you go by offensive snaps....DRob 90.9%; Atwell 68.5%.....DRob played more. But "playing more" and being a target more, are two different things. In fact if you look at the targets with respect to the snap percentages, it's crystal clear Tutu was the better option.Tutu has never been higher than the fourth receiving option.
Because there is no point to having him as a camp body. Might as well bring back Rozeboom while we are at it.He just might be a camp body, who has experience in the system. They brought in 3 other MLB's. So I don't get why people are upset with his signing. It's a near non event.
If they were C cup I was about to ask for photosMy titties got in an uproar when we signed Reeder as well.
Ever since then I've been wearing a manssiere.
Luckily, I'm not too overweight so it's only an A-cup.
Do you have venmo?If they were C cup I was about to ask for photos![]()
As fans, I think we might agree, please don't pay a guy for what he's done.....pay him for what he's going to do.There was nothing in Atwell's numbers that warrant 10 million dollars.
And that is the $10 mil dollar question.But I am intrigued. He does have nice route running skills and good hands. Definitely a speedster. Most times he'll be the fastest guy on the field. Question is, were they under using him for 4 years? If so, will they have a better plan for him? Does Stafford trust him?
Rozeboom got snatched up fairly quickly in the off-season but nobody seemed interested in Reeder. (Surprise!Because there is no point to having him as a camp body. Might as well bring back Rozeboom while we are at it.
Say it with me Memsie. TU TUAtwell gives me another frustrating year where others expect me to use his stupid nickname,
What are we trading to get him from Carolina?Might as well bring back Rozeboom while we are at it.
As much as I liked a lot of what we did there are things I feel we didn't do we should have like a change at LT and add a top end CB. The team however didn't want those things so I'll back them. I do like what we did though.
Nate Scheelhaase is in his 2nd year as "pass game coordinator". We'll see what he can do with Yarber, LaFleur, McVay and Tutu.My thinking on Tutu;
They are literally going to do a slight redesign of the offense to get him the ball more often and have him out there as the third wide receiver, often on the outside.
Sort of a refreshing of the same old idea of opening up the middle and short yards by tying up the outside receivers.
But this time we're going to pull the old switcheroo and actually use the outside receivers more.
We've been so good at finding these ballsy, tough as nails receivers that catch it over the middle consistently that we haven't really utilized the outside as much as we could or should. JMO.
They’ve probably trade us a 7th to take those handsome locks backSay it with me Memsie. TU TU
TuTu makes the long catch over his shoulder. Tutu draws the 50 yard PI. Tutu around the edge for the TD.
What are we trading to get him from Carolina?
That seems to be the consensus Rams fans opinion. Yet in the 4 games Kupp and Puka missed last year, Tutu had more targets in each game than DRob.....by a lot (34 - 19 total). It could be said that's an indication of who was #3 and who was #4. On those targets, Atwell had 23 receptions for 332 yards while DRob had 9 for 156 yards, 1 TD. Now if you go by offensive snaps....DRob 90.9%; Atwell 68.5%.....DRob played more. But "playing more" and being a target more, are two different things. In fact if you look at the targets with respect to the snap percentages, it's crystal clear Tutu was the better option.
As far as Humphrey over Atwell, sure that's an easy one. Pro Bowl center vs #3 WR. And yet the Rams managed to win a SB without both. There is no significant proof the Rams would have finished any better than they did from 2022-2024 with Humphrey instead of Tutu. None what-so-ever. Mahomes was sacked 6 times in SBLIX behind an OL that included Creed Humphrey. Humphrey alone couldn't make a significant difference because the OL is a 5 man job. There is the fact he's the one making the line calls though. Sure, taking nothing else into consideration, Humphrey over Tutu is a no-brainer. As I've pointed out, there are other things to consider. Like 1 WR can make a huge difference in the outcome of the game.
I remember reading that with Shelton in at Center, they were picking up almost a yard more per carry when they ran the ball inside than they did with Limmer.
I was the first one to call out Ellenbogan for talking out of his ass when he said that Shelton was signed to be the starter.
But after reading about that statistic, I'm pretty sure Coleman will be starting with Limmer backing him up.
That's a pretty big stat, and once again, gives us more options on offense.
Add in that you can never be too deep and experienced on the inside of the line.
Actually I was fine with extended Jackson, he was the best option out there, but the blood clots came back. They needed to draft a swing tackle, but they passed on that and now have to hope Humphries can step. concur on corner 100%.As much as I liked a lot of what we did there are things I feel we didn't do we should have like a change at LT and add a top end CB. The team however didn't want those things so I'll back them. I do like what we did though.
There were options other than Santa Claus that has been discussed enough times that it's really not worth going over again and again but that's fine. The blood clots were an issue that a lot of people tried to convince others wouldn't be an issue again. But as members have testified to it's always going to be an issue.Actually I was fine with extended Jackson, he was the best option out there, but the blood clots came back. They needed to draft a swing tackle, but they passed on that and now have to hope Humphries can step. concur on corner 100%.
Reeder is likely insurance IF Landman or Speights gets injured - AND - Dolac or Paul don’t acclimate enough.Because there is no point to having him as a camp body. Might as well bring back Rozeboom while we are at it.