SteezyEndo
The Immaculate Exception
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 7,528
What's funny is that now you have to include that caveat "go above 500 by season's end". That never had to included, because I don't know the last time we were 2 games over 500. I agree, that if Fisher doesn't make this team into a winner (9 wins or more), he should be fired.Until the Rams go above .500 by season's end, can't blame the journalists for the crappy headline. I personally still stand by Fisher getting fired by the end of season unless he has a winning record this year and next. He best prove that he's a consistent HC if he wants to convince me that he can take it another level
So three in a row isn't new?....Winning two road games within that 3 game win streak, isn't new? No let down after such a huge win over the Hawks, by going on the road and winning vs a non-NFC West opponent, isn't new?This team has done nothing new. They won two out of three in he division and beat the Bucs. They do that every year. Beating Buffalo and making it 4 in a row? That would be something new. Winning the next two against out of conference teams, would be new.
What's funny is that now you have to include that caveat "go above 500 by season's end". That never had to included, because I don't know the last time we were 2 games over 500. I agree, that if Fisher doesn't make this team into a winner (9 wins or more), he should be fired.
I was just pointing out that like clockwork, at whatever point in the season (previous to this one), we almost always slipped back below 500 the next week after. No, the Bills will be tough, and that's why we need to KILL them early, and never let up.The reality is that there is still plenty of games ahead of us, the Bills are 1 of many more to come after. Its all about endurance after this game we need to peak as high as we can now while its still early. Our O is struggling but I am confident they will work in unison as we move forward. I dont know the true difficulty of the Bills but they may be tougher than the Cardinals so I wouldn't take them lightly. We will soon find out.
I don't understand why you guys are getting bent out of shape. He is only saying what we all already know. History has shown us that the Rams are really really good at slipping back into mediocrity. As fans we all hope that this is the year we breakout, but less biased and more cynical minds would point to past seasons and ask whats different?
And the only answer we can give is our 3-1 record and hope it continues. I personally disagree with the fellow, but I don't hate him for having a perfectly rational opinion on our team. I actually kind of prefer to be looked at as underdogs.
The Rams gave the Titans two first-, two second-, and two third-round picks for the opportunity to take Jared Goff no. 1 in April’s draft. Yet, while no. 2 pick Carson Wentz has led the Eagles to an undefeated start, Goff hasn’t left the bench. Until he cracks the starting lineup, L.A.’s offense will go as far as Case Keenum will take it — and that isn’t going to be very far if he continues with a 55 percent completion rate, a 4–3 touchdown-to-interception ratio, 6.8 yards per attempt, and a 77.3 passer rating.
Through four weeks, just 22.9 percent of the Rams’ offensive drives have ended in a score (30th in the league). They’re 30th in points per game (15.8), last in yards per play (4.6), 31st in first downs (57), tied for 21st in passing touchdowns (4), and 23rd in yards per attempt (6.8).
After the team signed Tavon Austin to a four-year, $42 million contract extension in August, Fisher clearly wanted to get him to 100-plus catches this year, but the fourth-year wideout hasn’t done his part. The speedy slot receiver has seen 36 targets — almost 30 percent of the team’s total — but has just 16 catches for 159 yards (9.9 yards per catch) and one touchdown.
In comparison, Brian Quick has turned his 14 targets into eight catches, 153 yards (19.1 yards per catch), and three touchdowns, while Kenny Britt has turned 26 targets into 18 catches for 281 yards (15.6 yards per catch). If it isn’t the league’s worst, the Rams’ passing game is certainly among them. So, if they’re going to contend for the playoffs this year, it’s going to be because of their defense.
The Rams are the perfect example of why you shouldn’t trust what happens in Week 1. But they’re a pretty good example for why you shouldn’t trust what happens in weeks 2 through 4 either.
That's the one. Not saying it is going to happen again....just that this reminds me of it a lil bit.Started off 5-1, ended 7-9?
I don't understand why you guys are getting bent out of shape. He is only saying what we all already know. History has shown us that the Rams are really really good at slipping back into mediocrity. As fans we all hope that this is the year we breakout, but less biased and more cynical minds would point to past seasons and ask whats different?
And the only answer we can give is our 3-1 record and hope it continues. I personally disagree with the fellow, but I don't hate him for having a perfectly rational opinion on our team. I actually kind of prefer to be looked at as underdogs.
I hear ya. I mentioned that same season in one of the other threads; I don't remember which one. Maybe that "What Bills Fans are Saying" one. Anyway, I think that's what makes me jaded right now. lol.Started off 5-1, ended 7-9?
It's almost like we're playing a 15 game season. Throw out the tape from the first game and start from scratch. And you're right.PA Ram,
Thanks for those stats. When you remove the 1st game, we're actually pretty decent. 21ppg over the last 3; Keenum's stats over the last 3 are pretty good----a 94.8 qbr would definitely get it done. Thanks again.
We always seem to let up a lot of yards but that's kind of our philosophy.