- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 30,660
Joyner has been marginal if he's not dropping deep, he has the heart of a lion but he hasn't exactly been a sure tackler and doesn't anticipate well even in the box IMO. I want to see him sitting on the pine tbh, think that is a move that should have happened by now but it's hard for the staff to hold him accountable when they also have a starting ILB and CB failing miserably in their jobs too.
Thing that concerns me with Swearinger is he's commented before about coaches being control freaks (like his comments with Obrien). He's a complainer who I'm not sure will play with discipline, which is an area our secondary has struggled in. So I'd have to be confident he'd play the call to bring him in, as we don't need another guy doing his own thing when we're already in a situation where we have to endure Peters' BS.
On the positive side a guy like him will go balls out to show the Skins were wrong to cut him, so expect he'll play very well for whoever adds him. Hope we find a way to bring him in.
I disagree on both. Joyner has had his issues in deep-zone coverage this year, but he's played well in the box. Marqui Christian has been a bigger issue for us than Joyner there. Joyner is simply a better player. He's better in man coverage, he's a more reliable tackler (Christian is allergic to wrapping up), and he's better in the zone coverage near the LOS. Both him and Johnson have had their issues in deep coverage. I don't feel our guys have been communicating well or sticking to their responsibilities back there. They make mistakes when they try to force big plays.
As for Swearinger, he fits well with Wade Phillips. Wade isn't a control freak type and encourages players to be themselves. I don't see us having an issue with him freelancing. I don't recall the Redskins having issues with that nor the Cardinals. The issues he had with the Redskins were related to him running his mouth to the media.