I was looking at this roster and on paper, the Rams look damn good. With that said, there are some areas of concern.
RB: Richardson/Pead/Stacy/Ganaway. I don't like the committee approach. I like having a #1 back and maybe a change of pace back. Having so many backs can ruin the 'sync' of the offense.
While I respect your preferring to have a #1 RB, in this case, it doesn't make it an "area of concern". There isn't any one RB on this roster who is just that much better than the rest, and IMO, they have to perfect mix of speed, quickness, elusiveness, size, the ability to be a threat in the passing game, average to better than average pass blocking, etc. It's just NOT to be found IN ONE GUY. This group will be much better than most think. And while agree trying to force the issue and share carries can be disruptive at times, what I envision, is being able to "ride the hot hand" in a particular game. But that might be someone different from game to game.
FB: Do we have one? I know Kendricks will line up there but what about when you have two TE sets and need a FB? The combo of Cook and Kendricks can be as good as Gronk and Hernandez were. Don't sacrifice having those two ready to catch passes. Get a FB.
Kendricks AND Harkey (who is getting most of the reps while Kendricks remains on the PUP list) are both more than capable of handing these duties. They have actually worked on "22" personnel packages, meaning they have 2 TE's along with 2 RB (including a FB) so they can be very flexible and diverse in how they want to attack certain situations. IMO, this is the LEAST of all of your concerns. I can see them being very dangerous with a formation that includes Harkey and Cook at the LOS, and Kendricks lined up at FB. Harkey actually catches the ball very well, and could be a threat in the passing game in these situations.
WR: I am not worried about Givens or Austin. I'm worried about Pettis being ahead of Quick. Pettis is a great 4th WR. Maybe perfect in the Prohl role. He was studly on short yardage and redzone. Keep it at that. We need Quick to step up. He is sounding like he is catching on but there is only a month to go. Fix the drops.
First of all, if there was ever a year where the "starters" won't make one bit of difference in terms of overall snaps, thinking Quick needs to unseat Pettis is meaningless to me. As much as they continue to talk about the "RB by committee" approach, I think the WR positions will be every bit "by committee" this year. While you may dwell on "the drops" by Quick, to me, the thing to focus on, is he is getting targeted as much if not more than any other WR on the field right now. Which tells me 2 things. He is getting open, and more importantly, is getting where he needs to be when he needs to be there. Those two things will go a whole lot further in getting him on the field on Sundays, than an occasional drop.
Safety: McDonald is sounding like a good pick. Can Stewart move past missing tackles?
Keep a watchful eye on Cody Davis. He seems to have made his way up the Depth Chart to taking all of his reps with the 2nd unit. And while he might not be the "knockout artist" that Stewart likes to be, the one thing about Davis' game, is his ability to TACKLE. He gets guys to the ground.
While Stewart hasn't done anything to "lose" his job thus far, he hasn't flashed any signs of being all that much better than he was before. Lets see how things play out in the Preseason GAMES, when they actually have to tackle.
Well, that was a short list.
IMO we really need one of the running backs to 'run' away with the starting job.
We need Quick to 'catch' on. (okay, enough being punny)
We need a damn fullback.
And we need a legit deep safety who doesn't HAVE to make the big hit over the pass breakup.
In the end, I made this list to help myself put together a 'prospects to watch list' for the college football season to help my skillful mock drafts but as it sits today, I get to just sit and enjoy some college ball.
What do you think? Are there any positions that worry you?