A mea culpa.
Just wanted to state for the record my OWN mistake said here Months ago in the early offseason. I said we needed a WR2 because Davante Adams was more of a WR3.
That was/is an incorrect statement made by myself, @Coliseum Ram and needed to acknowledge.
I'm seeing it differently now.
Now I see a guy who is dedicated GREATLY to his craft. I see a guy who's on his way to the Hall Of Fame. Was a prolific Receiver with prime Aaron Rodgers in Green Bay. Then after the Rodgers era ended went and floundered around with dysfunctional Las Vegas and NYJ.
Now having a Renaissance, with the great Rams of McVay and Stafford (and everyone else)
Have a look at this guy's "guns" (arms) when he goes sleeveless.
Thought he was entering WR3 territory but now I see him heading to Jerry Rice/Larry Fitzgerald territory, playing productively til late 30's/early 40's.
My apologies to the GREAT Davante Adams, and of course as everyone else here also feels when they predict a negative on a Ram player or the team, am ECSTATIC to be wrong.
Just wanted to state for the record my OWN mistake said here Months ago in the early offseason. I said we needed a WR2 because Davante Adams was more of a WR3.
That was/is an incorrect statement made by myself, @Coliseum Ram and needed to acknowledge.
I'm seeing it differently now.
Now I see a guy who is dedicated GREATLY to his craft. I see a guy who's on his way to the Hall Of Fame. Was a prolific Receiver with prime Aaron Rodgers in Green Bay. Then after the Rodgers era ended went and floundered around with dysfunctional Las Vegas and NYJ.
Now having a Renaissance, with the great Rams of McVay and Stafford (and everyone else)
Have a look at this guy's "guns" (arms) when he goes sleeveless.
Thought he was entering WR3 territory but now I see him heading to Jerry Rice/Larry Fitzgerald territory, playing productively til late 30's/early 40's.
My apologies to the GREAT Davante Adams, and of course as everyone else here also feels when they predict a negative on a Ram player or the team, am ECSTATIC to be wrong.