zn said:
But the argument wasn't that having a great receiver makes you a winner. In fact it says nothing at all about the impact of top receivers.
It just went out and said "okay who are the best 5 receivers."
I hope he does a best 5 for every position.
I didn't see where Angry said there was an argument - period. Seemed to me he was just bringing up an observation. It would be like you responding to me with, "The point of the article wasn't that the Rams have one of the top 5 receivers in the NFL." I was just making a statement and I assume you took it as just that.
And you can look at things all sorts of ways but one aspect is that these receivers had to put up big numbers to be on this list. That means that they had someone throwing to them, a line capable of blocking for the QB, etc... In other words, there WERE some other pieces there. As you observed, most of these receivers went high in the draft. So a bad team took the elite receiver instead of building a team. How'd that work out for them?
Yet, there was a whole hell of a lot of griping (not by you that I can recall) over the Rams not going after the "elite" WR in this draft. Instead, the Rams went after more pieces to the puzzle most likely BECAUSE it takes more than that elite "weapon" in order to WIN.