RamBradford85
Rookie
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2024
- Messages
- 197
- Name
- Jamall
From what Kupp stated it seemed like he was open to that which is head scratching but apparently the Rams just wanted to move on.Probably the least surprising news for Rams fans by now. Its disappointing but had to happen. The injury history. Age. Decline. Woulda been nice if he took a pay cut but seriously who would do that in this day and age? Just like when Donald retired. They have to move on. They have a franchise to run. They owe it to the fans to put the best possible product on the field. We'll get over it when they start playing.
The post-June-designation is a surprise (to me). The Rams don't often do that.Probably the least surprising news for Rams fans by now. Its disappointing but had to happen. The injury history. Age. Decline. Woulda been nice if he took a pay cut but seriously who would do that in this day and age? Just like when Donald retired. They have to move on. They have a franchise to run. They owe it to the fans to put the best possible product on the field. We'll get over it when they start playing.
I think the issue is he can no longer separate and Rams didn't want to pay him when he couldn't function fully in their offense.From what Kupp stated it seemed like he was open to that which is head scratching but apparently the Rams just wanted to move on.
The PRO: More cap relief for 2025 spending (less Dead-$ in 2025).This is intriguing as $15 mil is a lot more cap relief than we expected for this year. I guess they can earmark that for rookie contracts and in season spending as needed so whatever they currently have they can use still for free agents. I'd expect a CB to be signed soon at the very least.
I'm sure he can still seperate but his production/availability didn't match his pay. I highly doubt we would have released Kupp if he made a lot less. The Rams have shown to get rid of players before the truly really decline. Its not like Kupp had a terrible year, its that it was terrible in terms of what we were paying him. I know I'm repeating myself but I only said head scratching because keeping him on as say a #3 would make this offense lethal with Adams. However the Rams want to move on and understandably so. Maybe McVay felt it was an insult to ask Kupp to be a 3/4 WR and that he could have better opportunities elsewhere? I know McVay likes to not get in the way of better opportunities for others.I think the issue is he can no longer separate and Rams didn't want to pay him when he couldn't function fully in their offense.
He can do well in a simpler offense with a limited route tree for himself and will probably be more of a contested catch, jump ball guy on seams and fades from the slot from here on out.
Yes! Basically, the Horns want two #1 WRs as their starting top two. Cooper couldn't cut it anymore in that regard.I think the issue is he can no longer separate and Rams didn't want to pay him when he couldn't function fully in their offense.
He can do well in a simpler offense with a limited route tree for himself and will probably be more of a contested catch, jump ball guy on seams and fades from the slot from here on out.
Does the open 2025 cap space carry over to 2026 if not used? If so, I guess in the end it doesn’t matter much - except to give yourself extra 2025 for a major in season move. Otherwise, it’ll carry over and you are at the same spot regardless.The PRO: More cap relief for 2025 spending (less Dead-$ in 2025).
The CON: However, there will now be Dead-$ on the cap in 2026.
The only think I can think of was the decline in his game. If they felt he was declining odds are they felt it wouldn't improve and just continue to decline.From what Kupp stated it seemed like he was open to that which is head scratching but apparently the Rams just wanted to move on.
He has had trouble separating the last 2 years. Usually his catches were made with a defender very close by. He was not the same.I'm sure he can still seperate but his production/availability didn't match his pay. I highly doubt we would have released Kupp if he made a lot less. The Rams have shown to get rid of players before the truly really decline. Its not like Kupp had a terrible year, its that it was terrible in terms of what we were paying him. I know I'm repeating myself but I only said head scratching because keeping him on as say a #3 would make this offense lethal with Adams. However the Rams want to move on and understandably so. Maybe McVay felt it was an insult to ask Kupp to be a 3/4 WR and that he could have better opportunities elsewhere? I know McVay likes to not get in the way of better opportunities for others.