I guess we'll have to wait and see on the Cambell comparison, not likely to be that bad. The Browns need to get a plan and stick to it. Rebuilding for 15 years just isn't getting it done. Maybe this is the year. I say that about the Rams every year.
maybe they should.
And yet Cleveland's passing game with no RB and missing Gordon for two games with a combination of Weeden, Campbell, and Hoyer ranked 11th compared to the Rams who ranked 26th.
they wanted him, it was a give us your best offer right now no negotiations deal, whoever offered the most in that bid was getting the deal. no ok they offered you this so we will counter with this, that's common knowledge (at least in these parts), so no there was no bidding war, it was a throw your best hand on the table thing and Holmgren underestimated Snyders stupidity.
did you guys play 10 games against top 10 Defenses? no, we did. think that might make a difference? were your WRs and RBs all first and second year players? no, ours were, think that might make a difference? and even with our "shitty QBs" pretty much splitting the season, we are drafting at #13, while you and your " no need for a QB team" are drafting #4, what happened?
I already showed you how Bradford faired against two teams ranked 26th in defense and the 32 ranked defense compared to how he faired against the other teams. Not to mention Houston who gave up 420 something odd points this year.
Flash ,one super hero to another GFYS
It's not worth it, Thor. I've seen that rationale before, and there's no reasoning with people who go that route. The last person who took the same template of criticisms and tried to make them stick was on here three times under different names, and his analysis was all mathematical. The majority of Rams fans who've seen Sam play, and are objectively and intimately familiar with the flux this team has been in for the past few years ... know better than to use math to qualify something.
how he fared huh? pretty sure he was either rated top 10 or close to it when he got hurt. and I guess you will just ignore the 10 games against top 10 defenses, and how with our shitty QBs we are still drafting 13 and you 4, and if you had any clue of how the Rams games went last year you would know that Sam would have won at least 2 more games if we had him in there last season as the back up, Clemons is not a very good QB (kind of reminds me of a Browns QB) cant throw anything deep, you also chose to ignore the fact that our WRs were all first or second year players some who were playing their first ever NFL games with Sam in there, They grew up a little after he went down, watch what he does with them next year, I have the feeling you will wish Sam was a Brown, just like Holmgren did 3 years ago, lol.
Yeah I agree I was just modeling for the rest of the board how a true died in the wool troll should be received.
What does this even mean?
That teams reach for QBs. Not directed at the Browns per se - just comments that teams don't go after QBs and move them up on your board. Does anyone really think Minn had Ponder that high on their board? Or was it because he was a QB and they needed a QB. Teams do it all the time and the Browns are not immune to it because they NEED a QB.
