Chernobyl: Best Mini-series I have ever seen

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Karate61

There can be no excellence without effort.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
6,924
Name
Jeff
So entertaining...o_O
So, the episode following the young kid being trained how to shoot and kill the irradiated pets...that did nothing for you? No emotions...nothing?
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
30,543
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #23
So, the episode following the young kid being trained how to shoot and kill the irradiated pets...that did nothing for you? No emotions...nothing?
Especially when you use the fact that the irradiated animals come faithfully to your whistle? (OUCH!)
 

Dieter the Brock

Fourth responder
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
8,196
So, the episode following the young kid being trained how to shoot and kill the irradiated pets...that did nothing for you? No emotions...nothing?

My review was based on what I watched.

Again they got the era right.
Good for the art directors.
Good makeup
Decent acting
But this is not drama.
It’s pure visual voyeurism at it’s finest.

Granted it’s got lots of cackling geiger counters lots of repetition of stuff already covered, then more repetition on top of that.

But There is a lot not to like about HBO’s Chernobyl

First off history buffs and nuclear reactor meltdown enthusiasts will be let down cause it doesn’t play the events factual enough.

And anyone who loves story is gonna be disappointed since the character development is atrocious. Every character is a stereotype from some other bad movie. Take the totally implausible character Emily Watson plays for example — she’s the fiery know-it-all scientist who goes up against those darn pesky Russian bureaucrats, who is also a sleuth who manages to somehow rise from her remote local and within a days is sitting next to Gorbachov. I don’t buy it. Bad writing.

I mean let’s take the killing of animals sequence - that was blatant pandering. I mean of course it’s horrible to euthanize pets. Who isn’t going to have emotions over seeing pets get euthanized??? But Those aren’t the same tears you shed in The Yearling or Sounder. It’s just a cheap stunt. But moreover - Who wants to see that shit? Who in the fuck wants to see animals get euthanized. And it does Zero for the story. It’s just cheap shock from the filmmaker.

But yeah.
The art direction is great. Nice and fucked up commie Russia look.
Congrats.

But Yeah
the makeup artists are top shelf artists - they got all that radioactivity ooze spot on.
Congrats

But Yeah,
the guy did a great job mumbling into a dictaphone and hanging himself. Skaarsgard was as in peak form as a laconic cartoon bolshevik ignoramus.
Congrats

But Yeah,
it’s a disaster movie.... like a Twister but with more grey clouds and Russian depravity.
Congrats
 

Karate61

There can be no excellence without effort.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
6,924
Name
Jeff
My review was based on what I watched.

Again they got the era right.
Good for the art directors.
Good makeup
Decent acting
But this is not drama.
It’s pure visual voyeurism at it’s finest.

Granted it’s got lots of cackling geiger counters lots of repetition of stuff already covered, then more repetition on top of that.

But There is a lot not to like about HBO’s Chernobyl

First off history buffs and nuclear reactor meltdown enthusiasts will be let down cause it doesn’t play the events factual enough.

And anyone who loves story is gonna be disappointed since the character development is atrocious. Every character is a stereotype from some other bad movie. Take the totally implausible character Emily Watson plays for example — she’s the fiery know-it-all scientist who goes up against those darn pesky Russian bureaucrats, who is also a sleuth who manages to somehow rise from her remote local and within a days is sitting next to Gorbachov. I don’t buy it. Bad writing.

I mean let’s take the killing of animals sequence - that was blatant pandering. I mean of course it’s horrible to euthanize pets. Who isn’t going to have emotions over seeing pets get euthanized??? But Those aren’t the same tears you shed in The Yearling or Sounder. It’s just a cheap stunt. But moreover - Who wants to see that crap? Who in the freak wants to see animals get euthanized. And it does Zero for the story. It’s just cheap shock from the filmmaker.

But yeah.
The art direction is great. Nice and freaked up commie Russia look.
Congrats.

But Yeah
the makeup artists are top shelf artists - they got all that radioactivity ooze spot on.
Congrats

But Yeah,
the guy did a great job mumbling into a dictaphone and hanging himself. Skaarsgard was as in peak form as a laconic cartoon bolshevik ignoramus.
Congrats

But Yeah,
it’s a disaster movie.... like a Twister but with more grey clouds and Russian depravity.
Congrats
Lol...maybe the sequel will be better!
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,204
Name
Burger man
My review was based on what I watched.

Again they got the era right.
Good for the art directors.
Good makeup
Decent acting
But this is not drama.
It’s pure visual voyeurism at it’s finest.

Granted it’s got lots of cackling geiger counters lots of repetition of stuff already covered, then more repetition on top of that.

But There is a lot not to like about HBO’s Chernobyl

First off history buffs and nuclear reactor meltdown enthusiasts will be let down cause it doesn’t play the events factual enough.

And anyone who loves story is gonna be disappointed since the character development is atrocious. Every character is a stereotype from some other bad movie. Take the totally implausible character Emily Watson plays for example — she’s the fiery know-it-all scientist who goes up against those darn pesky Russian bureaucrats, who is also a sleuth who manages to somehow rise from her remote local and within a days is sitting next to Gorbachov. I don’t buy it. Bad writing.

I mean let’s take the killing of animals sequence - that was blatant pandering. I mean of course it’s horrible to euthanize pets. Who isn’t going to have emotions over seeing pets get euthanized??? But Those aren’t the same tears you shed in The Yearling or Sounder. It’s just a cheap stunt. But moreover - Who wants to see that crap? Who in the freak wants to see animals get euthanized. And it does Zero for the story. It’s just cheap shock from the filmmaker.

But yeah.
The art direction is great. Nice and freaked up commie Russia look.
Congrats.

But Yeah
the makeup artists are top shelf artists - they got all that radioactivity ooze spot on.
Congrats

But Yeah,
the guy did a great job mumbling into a dictaphone and hanging himself. Skaarsgard was as in peak form as a laconic cartoon bolshevik ignoramus.
Congrats

But Yeah,
it’s a disaster movie.... like a Twister but with more grey clouds and Russian depravity.
Congrats

Frigg. I need to cancel my HBO order.

:sneak:
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
30,543
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #27
My review was based on what I watched.

Again they got the era right.
Good for the art directors.
Good makeup
Decent acting
But this is not drama.
It’s pure visual voyeurism at it’s finest.

Granted it’s got lots of cackling geiger counters lots of repetition of stuff already covered, then more repetition on top of that.

But There is a lot not to like about HBO’s Chernobyl

First off history buffs and nuclear reactor meltdown enthusiasts will be let down cause it doesn’t play the events factual enough.

And anyone who loves story is gonna be disappointed since the character development is atrocious. Every character is a stereotype from some other bad movie. Take the totally implausible character Emily Watson plays for example — she’s the fiery know-it-all scientist who goes up against those darn pesky Russian bureaucrats, who is also a sleuth who manages to somehow rise from her remote local and within a days is sitting next to Gorbachov. I don’t buy it. Bad writing.

I mean let’s take the killing of animals sequence - that was blatant pandering. I mean of course it’s horrible to euthanize pets. Who isn’t going to have emotions over seeing pets get euthanized??? But Those aren’t the same tears you shed in The Yearling or Sounder. It’s just a cheap stunt. But moreover - Who wants to see that crap? Who in the freak wants to see animals get euthanized. And it does Zero for the story. It’s just cheap shock from the filmmaker.

But yeah.
The art direction is great. Nice and freaked up commie Russia look.
Congrats.

But Yeah
the makeup artists are top shelf artists - they got all that radioactivity ooze spot on.
Congrats

But Yeah,
the guy did a great job mumbling into a dictaphone and hanging himself. Skaarsgard was as in peak form as a laconic cartoon bolshevik ignoramus.
Congrats

But Yeah,
it’s a disaster movie.... like a Twister but with more grey clouds and Russian depravity.
Congrats

Emily Watson's Ulana Khomyuk is a composite character of many scientists who helped the main scientist Valery Legasov to make the decision to sacrifice himself so that the other 17 sister nuclear power plants might be fixed, which according to the story, the Soviet state had no real inclination to do.

Ulana Khomyuk represented the thoughts of many scientists who were voices against the attempted cover-up. She was a crusader-character and was Valery's conscience. To tell the story of all the scientists would have made the mini-series much longer than 5 episodes, and this character allowed for story telling simplicity.

Valery Legasov was a flawed human being who performed like an absolute hero in the Chernobyl tragedy and afterwards. He was a sympathetic character who did despicable things like depressing the careers of Jewish scientists when he was their boss. He was not a character out of central Soviet casting

His partner in dealing with the Chernobyl disaster was Boris Shcherbyna, vice chairman of the Council of Ministers. His character began as a cynical Soviet who politically powerful and essential in dealing with the disaster. His character threatened to throw Valery Legasov from a plane while in flight if he didn't immediately explain the exact nature of the disaster to him. Boris transformed from Soviet scumbag into another hero, who supplied every need of Legasov and the other scientists. Again, not another character out of central casting.

I was trying to remember the miner's foreman's name, but he wasn't a character from central casting. Dude was brave as fuck (or his character was) by looking down the barrel of Soviet guns, when demanding what was required of him and his men. They mined naked because of safety, because it was more than a hundred degrees in the tunnel they were digging under the reactor core. I never knew about the independence of Russian miners until this mini series and i liked them. These were hero's who I had no idea existed until this show. Again, not out of Soviet central casting.

Yes, most of the characters were human fodder to stop the disaster. The killing of domestic pets was shocking, but was it true? Was it necessary to show the dirty work of the clean up? It is likely that tens of thousands died in the disaster, and yet the current official figure is only in the 30's. Dealing with that many individuals dying, there will be a majority of red shirts (Star Trek guys who had no character development and who you knew would get killed off in the episode)
I disagree with your review, Dieter. It was an incredible mini series.

You can go ahead and keep that HBO subscription @CGI_Ram
 
Last edited:

Dieter the Brock

Fourth responder
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
8,196
Emily Watson's Ulana Khomyuk is a composite character of many scientists who helped the main scientist Valery Legasov to make the decision to sacrifice himself so that the other 17 sister nuclear power plants might be fixed, which according to the story, the Soviet state had no real inclination to do.

Ulana Khomyuk represented the thoughts of many scientists who were voices against the attempted cover-up. She was a crusader-character and was Valery's conscience. To tell the story of all the scientists would have made the mini-series much longer than 5 episodes, and this character allowed for story telling simplicity.

Valery Legasov was a flawed human being who performed like an absolute hero in the Chernobyl tragedy and afterwards. He was a sympathetic character who did despicable things like depressing the careers of Jewish scientists when he was their boss. He was not a character out of central Soviet casting

His partner in dealing with the Chernobyl disaster was Boris Shcherbyna, vice chairman of the Council of Ministers. His character began as a cynical Soviet who politically powerful and essential in dealing with the disaster. His character threatened to throw Valery Legasov from a plane while in flight if he didn't immediately explain the exact nature of the disaster to him. Boris transformed from Soviet scumbag into another hero, who supplied every need of Legasov and the other scientists. Again, not another character out of central casting.

I was trying to remember the miner's foreman's name, but he wasn't a character from central casting. Dude was brave as freak (or his character was) by looking down the barrel of Soviet guns, when demanding what was required of him and his men. They mined naked because of safety, because it was more than a hundred degrees in the tunnel they were digging under the reactor core. I never knew about the independence of Russian miners until this mini series and i liked them. These were hero's who I had no idea existed until this show. Again, not out of Soviet central casting.

Yes, most of the characters were human fodder to stop the disaster. The killing of domestic pets was shocking, but was it true? Was it necessary to show the dirty work of the clean up? It is likely that tens of thousands died in the disaster, and yet the current official figure is only in the 30's. Dealing with that many individuals dying, there will be a majority of red shirts (Star Trek guys who had no character development and who you knew would get killed off in the episode)
I disagree with your review, Dieter. It was an incredible mini series.

You can go ahead and keep that HBO subscription @CGI_Ram

Keep HBO for Narcos Mexico which was a good show - yes

Again I am not trying to stop anyone from watching. Watch it - I did.

Chernobyl is essentially the director from Hangover 2 & 3 lighting Stanley Kubrick’s style guide on fire.

Nice score ripped off from Full Metal Jacket.

* p.s. nobody in the USSR was pointing guns at people and threatening them with getting shot at that time. It wasn’t 1880. That is just historically inaccurate. Like how everyone lived in squalor - thats just not the case. Again historically inaccurate.

Composite characters suck - period.

The miner thing was gay. Literally. Bunch of naked miners in a dark black tunnel.... I guess some people like to see man donger - not me. I like great tits. Not some fat dudes dick. But hey, to each his own.

Not my cup of tea
But enjoy!!!

Here is the Full Metal jacket score - tell me i’m wrong:


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qVv1XsGMv-I
 

ScotsRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
3,221
Name
Niall
I disagree, but, that was a great review.
By all accounts 1980s Soviet Union was grey, grim and filled with smoking and drinking.
I have noticed the drinking and smoking thing is used a lot, in movies too, as a crutch for character development.
I can't remember the last Liam Neison movie I saw where his character didn't drink scotch.
Anyway, I'm digging it but I enjoyed your take on it.
And you're right....spoiler? It's a historic event.

What's wrong with drinking Scotch?! I fucking bathe in it.
 

ScotsRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
3,221
Name
Niall
Btw - the show is just ridiculously good. It's a definitive TV moment for me akin to Band of Brothers or Das Boot (original Wolfgang Peterson one obviously). It's tv that just makes you stop in your tracks and go "damn".

Dieter obviously didn't like it and to each their own but I vehemently disagree with his take on it. It's extremely historically accurate too, the composite character being the only dramatic license taken.

There's a reason it's currently the highest rated show of all time on IMDB. Watch it.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
30,543
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #33
@Dieter the Brock : I immediately responded to your post above with anger, and I deleted it. I thought about it and watched a few videos of USSR life, and I see your point. To you, the show shows a dreary USSR society with no color. But I put two reasons why it seemed to be that way on this show: The first being that the show began in the evening during the disaster. Lighting is/was fluorescent, which always has a yellow unhealthy glow. Then after the explosion of the core, radioactive dust settled on everything. We didn't see that many pre-disaster video of Chernobyl city before the event, only the in the aftermath when looking back. If you watch the last episode, you will see the control room and the room above the core as being very clean with green tile. In the later shots of the wife that was relocated (along with the whole town) to a dreary set of government built apartments. I imagine these were dwellings of last resort and were very bad. After all, you don't dump a whole town of people on another town and expect grade A lodgings being available. Plus, it was a cold winter with dirty snow. Dirty snow is common everywhere until the next snowfall in every snowbound city around the World.

You said: "The miner thing was gay. Literally. Bunch of naked miners in a dark black tunnel.... I guess some people like to see man donger - not me. I like great tits. Not some fat dudes dick. But hey, to each his own."

I guess if liking to see a group of independent men defying authoritarianism is gay, then count me in. I never knew these guys existed, and even Secretary General Gorbechev feared their independence. I thought their willing sacrifice as free men, expressing their contempt for authority by mining naked, but using the ineffective face masks as a "middle finger" to the system was spirit affirming. For more on their sacrifice:
https://decider.com/2019/05/23/chernobyl-miners-epsiode-3/
 
Last edited:

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,441
Btw - the show is just ridiculously good. It's a definitive TV moment for me akin to Band of Brothers or Das Boot (original Wolfgang Peterson one obviously). It's tv that just makes you stop in your tracks and go "damn".

Dieter obviously didn't like it and to each their own but I vehemently disagree with his take on it. It's extremely historically accurate too, the composite character being the only dramatic license taken.

There's a reason it's currently the highest rated show of all time on IMDB. Watch it.
Ohhhh Das Boot.
Haven't seen that in years and years.
Time to revisit that one I think.
 

Dieter the Brock

Fourth responder
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
8,196
@Dieter the Brock : I immediately responded to your post above with anger, and I deleted it. I thought about it and watched a few videos of USSR life, and I see your point. To you, the show shows a dreary USSR society with no color. But I put two reasons why it seemed to be that way on this show: The first being that the show began in the evening during the disaster. Lighting is/was fluorescent, which always has a yellow unhealthy glow. Then after the explosion of the core, radioactive dust settled on everything. We didn't see that many pre-disaster video of Chernobyl city before the event, only the in the aftermath when looking back. If you watch the last episode, you will see the control room and the room above the core as being very clean with green tile. In the later shots of the wife that was relocated (along with the whole town) to a dreary set of government built apartments. I imagine these were dwellings of last resort and were very bad. After all, you don't dump a whole town of people on another town and expect grade A lodgings being available. Plus, it was a cold winter with dirty snow. Dirty snow is common everywhere until the next snowfall in every snowbound city around the World.

You said: "The miner thing was gay. Literally. Bunch of naked miners in a dark black tunnel.... I guess some people like to see man donger - not me. I like great tits. Not some fat dudes dick. But hey, to each his own."

I guess if liking to see a group of independent men defying authoritarianism is gay, then count me in. I never knew these guys existed, and even Secretary General Gorbechev feared their independence. I thought their willing sacrifice as free men, expressing their contempt for authority by mining naked, but using the ineffective face masks as a "middle finger" to the system was spirit affirming. For more on their sacrifice:
https://decider.com/2019/05/23/chernobyl-miners-epsiode-3/

I’d rather watch Zapped on and endless loop until I die than watch Chernobyl dick scene again :LOL:


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6gPJQWFGJO0