Yeah, I am just not sure if the trouble with TEs is related to trouble with the Star (Lake vs. Durant) position or with an athletic mismatch of the OLB position. Or whether it is a scheme issue where our D is having to choose between the extra run support offered by an OLB vs a 3 Safety (inclusive of Star position) look that we have seen our DC run.
Also, when it comes to OLB vs. TE, how many can actually cover a TE? Perhaps more than I think.
That said, of course the position could use an upgrade. My only point is that if the scheme is sound and an OLB is asked to bracket a TE vs. being solely responsible for a TE, does the OLB make a big difference. We have seen before that scheme can make up for a lot (i.e. Reader).