Can you win with an Alex Smith type QB?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

SAK11

Rookie
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
101
That's what's so crazy...Aaron Rodgers doesn't care. Really wanna see what Matty Ice (melt) does tomorrow.

He's been unstoppable all year so I doubt an average Green Bay defense on the road will change that. He's a better QB than Smith, especially this year when he was up there with Brady and Rodgers. You can win with Smith, though, just need a great defense and strong run game [Broncos last year played that way, so did Seattle when they won- look up Wilson's playoffs numbers that year]. Smith does a great job limiting turnovers. I think inevitably, your QB will have to make a few big plays for you, but Smith has enough ability to do so.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
He's been unstoppable all year so I doubt an average Green Bay defense on the road will change that.
Curious, who's offense is better, Atlanta's or Dallas? If they can slow down Dallas, I think the Falcons will be much easier to slow down as well. Remember, they almost beat the Falcons at home earlier in the year. Rodgers left a lil too much time on the clock. He's playing much better now.
The QB will always need to make a crucial throw, here or there, during a SB run. Maybe just a couple of 3rd down conversions converted with the legs. In this day and age, I just think an average QB just makes it harder to compete in the playoffs. Especially on the road.
Last thing, these are all pretty below average defensive teams....Except Pittsburgh. I think the teams that offensive lines play the best will win.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
I think the concrete answer is yes. Alex Smith is a better QB than 2015 Peyton Manning and anything the 2000 Ravens had.

But it's very difficult to win a Super Bowl with a guy like that.

IMO you need three things for that guy to hoist the trophy. An elite, as in top 5 or so in the era defense, an OL that can smash the opponents Dline, and a top flight RB.

KC needs a franchise back, and a true #1 WR, then they would be a top SB threat.

Dude they are a SB threat without those things.

Are you the same PhillyRam that used to post on the Herd and the Huddle?

That is right about the time (shortly there after) the dependence seemed to increase on the QB.

Yup, that's when the rule changes had started because of the hit to Collins that broke his jaw a couple of years prior, all the holding that NE did, and Philly's DB's were almost the same by the way, and the NFL making the refs enforce rules already on the books that were essentially being ignored for the most part.

Green Bay has some injuries, too. I'm thinking shootout here, going to be a fun one to watch.

This game is going to be the type I like I think.

Curious, who's offense is better, Atlanta's or Dallas?

ATL gained about 600 more yards than DAL this year.

ATL averages just over a TD per game more than DAL and about 70 yards more in the passing game.

Against essentially the same quality of opponents.

ATL is head and shoulders better than DAL on offense.
 

SAK11

Rookie
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
101
Curious, who's offense is better, Atlanta's or Dallas? If they can slow down Dallas, I think the Falcons will be much easier to slow down as well. Remember, they almost beat the Falcons at home earlier in the year. Rodgers left a lil too much time on the clock. He's playing much better now.
The QB will always need to make a crucial throw, here or there, during a SB run. Maybe just a couple of 3rd down conversions converted with the legs. In this day and age, I just think an average QB just makes it harder to compete in the playoffs. Especially on the road.
Last thing, these are all pretty below average defensive teams....Except Pittsburgh. I think the teams that offensive lines play the best will win.

Well first off, in terms of slowing the Dallas offense, Dallas was still able to score 31 on GB. Plus when these teams played earlier this year, Ryan destroyed them. And in terms of who's offense is better between Dallas' and Atlanta's, I'll take Atlanta's- more yardage, more points, less turnovers. They scored the 7th most points in NFL history, 71 points more than the next best team this year [New Orleans]. They scored 119 more points than Dallas and 108 more points than GB. Last week they torched Seattle. Shanahan's doing quite the job there, and they have a ton of weapons, it goes well beyond just Jones and Freeman. Great situation for Ryan and he's taking advantage of it in a huge way as the likely MVP of this season.

I'm not saying GB won't win, just that it won't be on the back of their defense; we're probably looking at a very high scoring game.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,011
Name
Scott
IMO you need three things for that guy to hoist the trophy. An elite, as in top 5 or so in the era defense, an OL that can smash the opponents Dline, and a top flight RB.



Dude they are a SB threat without those things.

Are you the same PhillyRam that used to post on the Herd and the Huddle?



Yup, that's when the rule changes had started because of the hit to Collins that broke his jaw a couple of years prior, all the holding that NE did, and Philly's DB's were almost the same by the way, and the NFL making the refs enforce rules already on the books that were essentially being ignored for the most part.



This game is going to be the type I like I think.



ATL gained about 600 more yards than DAL this year.

ATL averages just over a TD per game more than DAL and about 70 yards more in the passing game.

Against essentially the same quality of opponents.

ATL is head and shoulders better than DAL on offense.


Well, they can't seem to win a playoff game as currently constituted. So I thought that was the why the question asked..... and yes same PhillyRam. I post here occasionally.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,232
Name
Burger man
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #68
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...ry-2016-nfl-playoffs-conference-championships

Is this the best QB final four in NFL history?

Brady. Rodgers. Roethlisberger. Ryan. As fun as it is to make jokes about Connor Cook's and Brock Osweiler's names flashing across the marquee for a playoff game, there's something cool about having four of the absolute best quarterbacks in football suiting up for the conference championships this Sunday. It's tough to make it to the conference championships without one interloper in the mix. Last year, the odd man out was the ghost of Peyton Manning, and he ended up winning the whole thing.

This year, barring injury, we know a great quarterback at the height of his powers will be hoisting the Lombardi trophy in Houston on Feb. 5. We have to look back only 12 months to know that's not guaranteed on an annual basis, but how rare is it for the "final four" quarterbacks in an NFL season to be this good? Is it possible that we're looking at the best closing foursome in recent playoff history?

There are a few ways to measure quarterback quality, and those various methods give us different answers to that question. Let's run through them.

Obviously, these four passers are among the league leaders in just about every category. One of Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers and Matt Ryan is likely to win the AP's MVP award this season, while Ben Roethlisberger isn't far off from their 2016 standard. Roethlisberger comes in as the 10th-best passer in the league by opponent-adjusted Total QBR, while Ryan, Brady and Rodgers each rank in the top four. The only top-four passer missing is Dak Prescott, who was knocked out by Rodgers last Sunday.

We only have QBR going back through 2006, though, so it won't be very useful in comparing today's passers to those of old. Let's instead work with another helpful single-number metric that serves as a better version of passer rating: adjusted net yards per attempt (ANY/A), which weights interceptions and passing touchdowns appropriately based on their estimated empirical value while also incorporating sacks and sack yardage.

The league as a whole averaged 6.2 adjusted net yards per attempt this season. As you might suspect, our four passers were way ahead of the curve. Roethlisberger averaged 7.0 ANY/A. Rodgers was just ahead of him at 7.2, with his numbers spiking during the second half. Brady and Ryan were in another world, though: Brady averaged 8.8 ANY/A, while Ryan was just over 9.0. Among QBs with 20 passes per game or more, the 9.0 ANY/A mark is third in league history behind Peyton Manning's 2004 season (9.8) and Rodgers' 2011 campaign (9.4). Pretty good company.

Combining their statistics into one super-passer, our 2016 crop averaged 8.3 ANY/A, which is the best mark since the AFL-NFL merger of 1970. That's impressive, but it's not necessarily surprising, given that quarterbacks are more productive today than ever before. Teams averaged 5.0 ANY/A or less without fail between 1970 and 1988, then between 5.0 and 5.9 ANY/A every year short one between 1989 and 2013, but they've risen over 6.0 ANY/A as a league in each of the past three seasons.

The next way to measure quality, then, would be to adjust our measure of quarterback play for the quality of the opposition. Simple enough: Our final four averages 8.3 ANY/A, and the league average is 6.2, leaving our stars (after rounding) 33.3 percent above league average. That's better than a lot of recent seasons and the best season-adjusted performance since 2005, but it's only 24th in the Super Bowl era. The vast majority of pre-1990 seasons topped this, in part because bad quarterbacks in that era were horrific in a way that the worst quarterbacks of today simply aren't allowed to be. The worst ANY/A in 1980 among players with 100 passes or more, to pick a year, belonged to Mike Phipps, who threw two touchdowns against nine picks in six starts for the Bears.

Let's try it another way. Among passers who have started a minimum of seven games, Ryan ranks first in ANY/A this year. Brady ranks second. Rodgers ranks sixth, and Roethlisberger rounds out the group at ninth. Those spots add up to 18. Is that the lowest number we can come up with for a conference championship foursome?

The answer is no, but it's pretty close. I'm comfortable using this to get a sense of who might serve as competition for the best season-ending quarterback combos of all time. The 2016 season is tied for the fifth-best stretch of all time by this admittedly tortured metric. Here's who else is in the running:

1992 (18): Jim Kelly, Bills; Dan Marino, Dolphins; Troy Aikman, Cowboys; Steve Young, 49ers

Not bad, right? Four no-doubt Hall of Famers, all of whom were between 26 and 32 and in the prime of their respective careers. Somewhat surprisingly, they weren't especially great in the conference championships that year. Kelly and Marino each threw one touchdown against two picks in Miami, while Young threw two picks of his own during San Francisco's 30-20 loss to Dallas. Only Aikman -- who went 24-of-32 for 322 yards with two touchdowns and no picks -- lived up to the hype.

1970 (18): Daryle Lamonica, Raiders; Johnny Unitas, Colts; Craig Morton, Cowboys; John Brodie, 49ers

Lamonica actually left the conference championship game after four pass attempts with a pulled thigh muscle and was replaced by Hall of Famer George Blanda, who was 43 and serving primarily as Oakland's punter. He threw three picks, with Unitas outdoing him on an 11-for-30 day, albeit one that saw him average 22.3 yards per completion. The 37-year-old Unitas finished the year 11th in ANY/A, while the other three passers were among the top four. Brodie and Morton were one and two, respectively, but it was a career year for Brodie, who won league MVP. Morton was effective but lost his job the following year to Roger Staubach, with whom he would trade off for the next several years. The 2016 class is better.

1993 (17): Joe Montana, Chiefs; Jim Kelly, Bills; Steve Young, 49ers; Troy Aikman, Cowboys

This is the same group as 1992, of course, just replacing Marino (who tore his Achilles in October) with Montana. Montana was on the downside of his career and threw only 298 passes, but he was efficient enough to finish fourth in ANY/A. He threw one pick and went just 9-of-23 against the Bills before giving way to Dave Krieg, while Kelly avoided takeaways on a day where Thurman Thomas ran for 186 yards. Aikman suffered a concussion in the NFC Championship Game and was replaced by Bernie Kosar, but he left them up 28-7 after an excellent first half.

1981 (14): Ken Anderson, Bengals; Dan Fouts, Chargers; Danny White, Cowboys; Joe Montana, 49ers

Montana was probably the weakest link in this group, given that this was his third year in the league and his first as a full-time starter. He actually threw three picks in the NFC Championship Game, but made up for it with a moderately famous touchdown pass in the fourth quarter. Anderson was the MVP in this, a career season, and Fouts is in the Hall of Fame, but our 2016 class is clearly better now than this group was at the time, even if nobody finished any lower than sixth in ANY/A.

1995 (13): Brett Favre, Packers; Troy Aikman, Cowboys; Jim Harbaugh, Colts; Neil O'Donnell, Steelers

Not quite as exciting, huh? The NFC matchup pitted the top two passers in the league in what ended up as a thrilling 38-27 Cowboys victory, which saw the Packers up 27-24 entering the fourth quarter before the Cowboys scored two touchdowns, with Favre mixing in a key interception at midfield to set up the game winner. Emmitt Smith ran the ball 35 times for 150 yards for the Cowboys, a carry total that has been topped only twice in a playoff game since. O'Donnell was the game manager expected to avoid mistakes and hold leads for Pittsburgh, while Harbaugh had an incredible career year he never really came close to matching before or after. They don't match up with 2016's group.

1998 (11): John Elway, Broncos; Vinny Testaverde, Jets; Chris Chandler, Falcons; Randall Cunningham, Vikings

I'm as surprised as you are, but the quarterbacks of 1998 were incredible. They held the raw ANY/A record for 18 years until the 2016 foursome just beat it, and they each finished among the top five in ANY/A during this bizarre season. Elway was 38 and blessed with a dominant running game, requiring him to throw a mere 356 passes. Chandler averaged 9.6 yards per attempt, chucking it downfield in between Jamal Anderson carries and never again topped even 8 yards per pass. Testaverde set his passer rating record by nearly 13 points at 101.6; he would tear his Achilles in Week 1 the following year, lead the league in interceptions the following campaign, and then do the same thing four years later in Dallas at age 41. Cunningham led the league in ANY/A and was an absolute monster throwing to Cris Carter and the debuting Randy Moss, but it was his first season as a starter since the end of the 1994 campaign. It's fair to say, even given the ANY/A gap, that the 2016 group carried more weight.

Other measures also suggest that the class of 2016 would rate among the best of all time. These seven quarterbacks have combined for four MVP awards, with Brady and Rodgers having garnered two each. Assuming one of Brady, Rodgers or Ryan win the award this year, these four passers will have a combined five MVP trophies before they hit the field on Super Bowl Sunday. That's topped by only four other seasons: 1997 (six awards), 2009 and 2013 (seven awards), and last year, which sent eight MVP awards to the final four with Peyton Manning, Brady, Cam Newton and Carson Palmer. The presence of Brady, Roethlisberger and Rodgers adds seven Super Bowl wins to the mix, more than any final foursome in league history.

As always, with things like this, it's a matter of preference. Because it's still unclear whether Ryan will be a Hall of Famer in the long run, and the 1993 season featured a limited Montana, I would go with the four surefire Hall of Famers from the 1992 playoffs. Once in 24 years might not be the best ever, but it sure seems pretty remarkable to me.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
ATL gained about 600 more yards than DAL this year.

ATL averages just over a TD per game more than DAL and about 70 yards more in the passing game.

Against essentially the same quality of opponents.

ATL is head and shoulders better than DAL on offense.

And in terms of who's offense is better between Dallas' and Atlanta's, I'll take Atlanta's- more yardage, more points, less turnovers. They scored the 7th most points in NFL history, 71 points more than the next best team this year [New Orleans]. They scored 119 more points than Dallas and 108 more points than GB.
I'll agree that Kyle Shanahan has done a remarkable job. Dude just knows how to move the ball. Ryan is playing better than ever. I'll still take the balance of Dallas. In any other year, this team would be playing today. Aaron Rodgers has been on fire. The way he can control the game from the offensive end.
The major difference in the Cowboys and Atlanta happens to be the offensive line which allows balance to the Dallas team. TOP. Ball control.
I expect a couple of key turnovers from Ryan today. Probably a few from New England too.