Broncos at Rams Preseason Game 3

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
OldSchool said:
It's possible but that costs a spot at another position. We already think it'll be 9 OLine. We have insane depth in the secondary. Injuries at both linebacker spots. Not sure they can keep 7 there.
Click to expand...

This is why I believe Reynolds makes for some good trade fodder. We need a returner, so who goes home ... Hodge ? I can't cut him.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: Loyal, BonifayRam and Ram65
OldSchool said:
Interesting. I was gonna say CB and best OL regardless of Guard or Tackle. Just don't see ILB unless none of the guys step up with Kiser hurt and we don't resign Littleton. Even then I'd put it third.
Click to expand...

Need some juice to on the DL.... Another playmaker to help Donald and replace Brockers. That is a top need because if Donald ever missed time, they would have nobody to scare an opposing offense. And as it is, another disruptive DL would take the D to another level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ram65
Riverumbbq said:
This is why I believe Reynolds makes for some good trade fodder. We need a returner, so who goes home ... Hodge ? I can't cut him.
Click to expand...
Again this started with me saying how great the depth was at WR I get it. But that's not the only position we have depth at and we have a couple other positions we need depth. This cut down day is going to be brutal. I just don't see much coming in a trade for anybody tbh.
 
PhillyRam said:
Need some juice to on the DL.... Another playmaker to help Donald and replace Brockers. That is a top need because if Donald ever missed time, they would have nobody to scare an opposing offense. And as it is, another disruptive DL would take the D to another level.
Click to expand...
Possible as well. All of this speculating we're doing will depend on how recent draft picks develop.
 
fearsomefour said:
Local TV. May not have been 11, I’m sure you’re right. Local is local to me. Haha.
Click to expand...
Yeah same broadcast team I'm pretty sure the first two were on channel 7 here. But like you say it's on local TV and that's all that matters. Don't have to watch a stream on my computer :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: fearsomefour
Akrasian said:
I strongly suspect that Bortles in the regular season is better than Allen or Wolford.

But if the Colts are willing to give up enough . . .

Frankly, without Goff, the Rams are not a realistic SB contender anyway.
Click to expand...
Well, of course Bortles value is his experience.
The idea with Allen would be to keep him as a three and decide if he can replace Bortles as the two for the long term going forward.
Bortles would give the team a competitive chance of Goff was down for a few weeks. A full season? Yikes.
But he has proven he can play in the league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal and Akrasian
Wofford reminds me of Case Keenum. Could be a nice back up as he gains experience.

Worth keeping on the practice squad for a year and then let him compete for the #2 next yr.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: RamBall, OldSchool and fearsomefour
We don't need 7 wide receivers, because the other top 6 will be one heck of a talented group. (No consideration for returner in that comment).
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: BonifayRam, OldSchool and fearsomefour
PhillyRam said:
Wofford reminds me of Case Keenum. Could be a nice back up as he gains experience.

Worth keeping on the practice squad for a year and then let him compete for the #2 next yr.
Click to expand...
Yeah.
Ideally Allen can transition to the two next year and Wolford to the three.....next year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back