Just saying, that's the type of thing that not too many people on this site want to see. Just a warning that it might not help your point get across as well as you'd like.
That and lets be real here, the guy has played 100% of his career here and hasn't even been gone for a full year. That's still a very significant tie, lets not act like he's been gone for 7 years and we're still talking about whether or not he was the guy. He's been gone for a few months tops, that's still very fresh. You can say it's time for everyone to move on, but when not even one down of football has been played for either as a member of their new teams you can't say that it's not a significant tie. That's like saying that Pace, Faulk, Warner or Holt or any of the GSOT don't have significant ties to the Rams because they're not here anymore.
I just don't get the vitriol. This isn't much different from the Jackson situation, when a guy who's got significant ties to your team leaves, it's something you're going to be talking about for a while.