X said:
DR RAM said:
I think Richardson is a top 5 talent, but best value in regards to depth???? I really like some of the other RB's, Wilson and Martin in particular for 3 downers, and there are a lot of 3rd down/change of pace guys that I like, and a couple of sleepers.
Not a ton of corner depth, which I wouldn't be huge on if we KEEP Bartell, or sign a FA.
If we do the inevitable and trade down, then we have to draft for value. If we do that, we could end up with 3 blue chippers in THIS draft.
[hil]Sorry Libertad and I are tag-teaming you here[/hil], but do you really think Richardson would be drafted and then used solely as depth? I would like to think the Rams would suddenly become a two-headed rushing attack MONSTER. Both Jackson and Richardson fresh all game would be a nightmare for opposing defenses. Punish a D-line long enough with that kind of stuff, and Bradford will ultimately benefit. No?
Just said in another thread here...Richardson is special, but not the best value IMO. For instance, if the Rams drafted D. Wilson, L. James, or I. Pead, etc..they could run the ball or shift to slot and be very dangerous, plus help in the return game which the Rams sorely need. Rams would never use Richardson in that capacity, and that is why I wouldn't pick him. Even if he is an upgrade over SJ (sorry SJ), he doesn't make the team significantly better. We need starters on the field.
And, I don't mind, done a lot of homework on this draft. I'm answering these questions with my GM hat on