- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 41,969
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecb15/ecb15ae6afdff0466a647e2bbcfa59d84d9d211e" alt="Mood: Youngblood"
Inject it straight into my veins
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0D4OV95bQ&ab_channel=PrimeVideo
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0D4OV95bQ&ab_channel=PrimeVideo
What I saw was different for sure and only like 30 second clips.sadly , I don't think thats a real trailer
Inject it straight into my veins
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0D4OV95bQ&ab_channel=PrimeVideo
Most of the "content creators" I've seen with videos about this season talk about some of up to book 5 in this season. And I agree it looks like it's more true to the books than the first 2 seasons.This definitely looks good. Better than what season 2 was. It looks like it is going to cover a lot of Book 4 in one season.
Yup.sadly , I don't think thats a real trailer
Yeah but they didn't have to "Bourne" these books. They could have stayed close to the story and just cut out a lot of the scenes and change the story a little bit to accomplish that.Most of the "content creators" I've seen with videos about this season talk about some of up to book 5 in this season. And I agree it looks like it's more true to the books than the first 2 seasons.
I've come to accept that it won't be a real conversion of the books that would just simply be too many seasons to realistically make a show. I appreciate it now for bringing the books in their way to TV.
I agree I'm just living with those issues since they brought it to TV for me tbhYeah but they didn't have to "Bourne" these books. They could have stayed close to the story and just cut out a lot of the scenes and change the story a little bit to accomplish that.
For example - they didn't have to make the forsaken immortal where they can't die from sword wounds.
Well season 3 does look closer to the books at least from the Edmunds field thingy and the White Tower thingy and Galad and Gawyn thingy and the Cooramor and so on and so on.I agree I'm just living with those issues since they brought it to TV for me tbh
As a die hard trekkie that's not surprising. Yet Paramount keeps saying they can't green light more Star Trek projects because they cost too much money to make. Soooo, what's the issue here? They have tried to experiment with different things with Star Trek and some has been great and some has not. Strange New Worlds and Lower Decks has been good. Discovery was ok'ish but I could take or leave it (Section 31... yawn). I liked Picard but it struggled with inconsistent vision the first two seasons as they moved between writers and producers. Season 3 was a blueprint to how Paramount can make a shit ton of money though. Trekkies like me who cut their teeth on the franchise in the 80s-90s are foaming at the mouth for more from those worlds. TNG had a great send off with season 3 of Picard but DS9 lore particularly could feed a franchise for seasons. Create the "Star Trek: Legacy" that fans have been yelling for since Picard ended with Terry Matalas in charge following Seven in command of the Enterprise G with Picard and LaForges kids while working out of DS9 to explore the Gamma Quadrant. I mean come on, slam dunk success.Holy cow
![]()
The 'Star Trek' Franchise Has Made $2.6 Billion for Streaming Services | Charts
Netflix has realized the most global value from the 'Star Trek' franchise, but Paramount+ is gaining groundwww.thewrap.com
Linda Cardellini to play Jason's mother
in new Crystal Lake TV show on Peacock
I've liked Linda Cardellini for years , so it doesn't really matter if the show is actually and good or not , I'll still be watching .
![]()
well , it was the 70's ,
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRHZr3VlpgE
![]()
My wife and I watched American Primeval this weekend.‘American Primeval’ on Netflix was fantastic.
It’s a limited series, that takes place in Wyoming around the time the Mormons were trying to find their permanent home in the west.
It’s got Indians, wagon trains, Jim Bridger, trappers, and Cavalry.
I couldn't watch Discovery , and the only reason I watched Section 31 was to see just how bad it , and it was badAs a die hard trekkie that's not surprising. Yet Paramount keeps saying they can't green light more Star Trek projects because they cost too much money to make. Soooo, what's the issue here? They have tried to experiment with different things with Star Trek and some has been great and some has not. Strange New Worlds and Lower Decks has been good. Discovery was ok'ish but I could take or leave it (Section 31... yawn). I liked Picard but it struggled with inconsistent vision the first two seasons as they moved between writers and producers. Season 3 was a blueprint to how Paramount can make a shit ton of money though. Trekkies like me who cut their teeth on the franchise in the 80s-90s are foaming at the mouth for more from those worlds. TNG had a great send off with season 3 of Picard but DS9 lore particularly could feed a franchise for seasons. Create the "Star Trek: Legacy" that fans have been yelling for since Picard ended with Terry Matalas in charge following Seven in command of the Enterprise G with Picard and LaForges kids while working out of DS9 to explore the Gamma Quadrant. I mean come on, slam dunk success.
Anyway, my rant. I would give real money for multiple seasons of something that brought DS9 (and other ST) lore, old characters, and locals back to a modernized tv show.
@Elmgrovegnome doesnt miss with his recommendationsMy wife and I watched American Primeval this weekend.
Wow.
Very intense.
I loved it.
He certainly nailed this one.@Elmgrovegnome doesnt miss with his recommendations
Truer words have never been spoken!He certainly nailed this one.
One of the best shows I’ve seen in a while.
I especially appreciate the fact that there was no unnecessary filler.
Too many shows try to stretch out the plot with nonsense.
This show was a home run.