BadCompany
Rookie
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2013
- Messages
- 332
While I would like to see them reap another RGIII like bounty I don't think its going to happen. For one thing I think Snead has pushed the envelope enough, and at some point you gotta know when to hold them, as Kenny Rogers would say. You don't want to get too cute and undo all you have done.
Plus, I think the Texans are going to control this draft, and I think they will be the ones trading down. My guess will be to six, with Atlanta, who will leap up to take Clowney. That move, I think anyways, will undermine just about everything else we might want to do. I don't think anybody wants to fall too far down the draft, with six being just about the lowest we would want to go, give or take, but if Houston drops to six they aren't going to give up a lot to move back up to two. So really any trade down would have to be to at least seven in my opinion. But I don't know if Tampa has any need to move up, which means the first team, again, in my humble opinion, that might panic into "needing" a QB at #2 would be Minnesota. But do we want to fall all the way back to #8? We might get lucky and still have our guy there, but it might also be the "too cute" option mentioned in the poll.
As for the others, Jacksonville, Cleveland and Oakland may all want a quarterback, but they also know we aren't going to take them at two and with no clear difference between the top guys at the moment (at least not on the surface) they can all sit where they are and walk away with a QB and claim "he's the guy we wanted all along" (assuming Clowney goes first). So unless they fall in love with a particular guy I don't see them being all that hot and bothered to move up either. Of course that could all change if a QB goes #1, but if not I think there is a pretty good chance we end up staying where we are.
Might be the first time a team's fanbase is disappointed to have a #2 and a #13 pick in a draft!
Plus, I think the Texans are going to control this draft, and I think they will be the ones trading down. My guess will be to six, with Atlanta, who will leap up to take Clowney. That move, I think anyways, will undermine just about everything else we might want to do. I don't think anybody wants to fall too far down the draft, with six being just about the lowest we would want to go, give or take, but if Houston drops to six they aren't going to give up a lot to move back up to two. So really any trade down would have to be to at least seven in my opinion. But I don't know if Tampa has any need to move up, which means the first team, again, in my humble opinion, that might panic into "needing" a QB at #2 would be Minnesota. But do we want to fall all the way back to #8? We might get lucky and still have our guy there, but it might also be the "too cute" option mentioned in the poll.
As for the others, Jacksonville, Cleveland and Oakland may all want a quarterback, but they also know we aren't going to take them at two and with no clear difference between the top guys at the moment (at least not on the surface) they can all sit where they are and walk away with a QB and claim "he's the guy we wanted all along" (assuming Clowney goes first). So unless they fall in love with a particular guy I don't see them being all that hot and bothered to move up either. Of course that could all change if a QB goes #1, but if not I think there is a pretty good chance we end up staying where we are.
Might be the first time a team's fanbase is disappointed to have a #2 and a #13 pick in a draft!