- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 5,364
- Name
- Dave
OOooooHHH!!!He plugs it into his fat face.
Sorry I'm not sorry.
I AOTN and then LOL'd.
OOooooHHH!!!He plugs it into his fat face.
Sorry I'm not sorry.
KSDK has an economist on last night explaining why he thought the team would be moving.Is that the entirety of the quote or does Bernie actually expound on why he believes that to be the case?
He won't pay much to relocate or build the stadium. The NFL will waive or drastically reduce the relocation fee (he's one of the most powerful owners in the NFL) and the NFL will foot a large chunk of the bill for a new stadium and the taxpayers will pay another large chunk leaving a relatively small chunk left for him to cover. Add in the tax breaks I'm sure LA will probably give him just so the team comes(just like STL did to entice them) and the costs that everyone keeps saying Kroenke will have don't look so high, especially when you consider his investment would double in value overnight.Do the Rams really have a chance to move to LA? I mean, Stan won't even pay for a stadium in St.Louis, and people think he's gunna build a stadium and pay to relocate the team? Who cares what they're worth if your the owner of the team? Do you plan on selling them?
I've always embraced the philosophy that all pizza is good, just some is better than others. With the exception of Papa Johns who makes the worst pizza on this planet. As to the Rams moving to tinsel town....Well, it would be nice if they could actually win and that in itself would create a better fan base that erodes each in every year with a team that is not even competitive.
KSDK has an economist on last night explaining why he thought the team would be moving.
TBH, I'm hearing so many people now say that the team is leaving that it's hard to ignore. When so many people are saying it, you see the NFL hire people to get a team in LA and build a stadium, Kroenke already has the land purchased, the value increase by moving, no leadership here doing that much, etc. it becomes pretty compelling. Add in all the questions about how good this team really is and its future of getting better with no QB, it becomes harder for local leadership to justify huge tax increases to pay for a new stadium.
Why ruin today worrying about something that may not happen? So because a pregnant hamster says the rams are moving I am supposed to rip up the rest of my tickets and go into mourning? I chose a long time ago not to pay any attention to any of this LA stuff. If they move I will still be a Rams fan and will start going to Columbia on Saturdays. Oh and did Bernie say when Coach Painter was showing up to resurrect mizzous basketball program?
Nothing to do with your comments about the sport in which we all claim to love and the team in which we all love to follow despite many reasons why more sane people gave up on them years ago...
Do any of these people have actual insight into the situation? Or are they arbitrary experts that are just giving their opinion?
Do any of these people have actual insight into the situation? Or are they arbitrary experts that are just giving their opinion?
...pregnant hamster...
Well, he was an economist and he had actually looked into the numbers so, while he may not be the best source, he's better than just some random reporters. And then add in all the other smoke that I mentioned like the NFL saying they'd fund a large chunk of money for the stadium, Kroenke already owning land, an NFL run committee formed to get a team in LA, etc., I have officially changed my thoughts on what's going to happen. IMO, the Rams are moving unless STL acts FAST! And the offer has to be VERY compelling. I just wonder if taxpayers will go for it considering how bad the team has been and is still looking.Do any of these people have actual insight into the situation? Or are they arbitrary experts that are just giving their opinion?
"Expert" opinions. Just like news shows that bring in someone with experience in the field to spout whatever narrative they want to push. Half the time the people don't know much, some just assume nobody will know, others are so far removed from the field they have no idea how it works anymore.
From a pure numbers standpoint, there could easily be a reason why moving is better. However it's not just numbers that gets factored into these decisions though. So having an economist coming on the show is no different from having a dentist come on there.
Well, he was an economist and he had actually looked into the numbers so, while he may not be the best source, he's better than just some random reporters. And then add in all the other smoke that I mentioned like the NFL saying they'd fund a large chunk of money for the stadium, Kroenke already owning land, an NFL run committee formed to get a team in LA, etc., I have officially changed my thoughts on what's going to happen. IMO, the Rams are moving unless STL acts FAST! And the offer has to be VERY compelling. I just wonder if taxpayers will go for it considering how bad the team has been and is still looking.