shaunpinney
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2012
- Messages
- 4,805
I'd (try) and sign him to a 3 year contract, $16m with $7m guaranteed - this should give us enough $$ left to secure a C and OG
I would rather put a rookie next to him then Robinson on Left side. If he can't handle it with a good rookie he don't need to be thereIf we do resign big Joe, it is imperative that we move Saffold to RG. I don't want a rookie guard in there that may require the RT to provide cover for the inevitable protection breakdowns that come with 1st year players. Of course if we sign Blalock, Saffold will in all likelihood move anyway.
And she is also the reason No Contract has been signed yet!.. Had to have a Honeymoon.. who ever heard of such a thing!.... BAH! HUM-BUG!..She needs to learn to set his priorities..!!His wife sure did pick a good time to marry him..
And she is also the reason No Contract has been signed yet!.. Had to have a Honeymoon.. who ever heard of such a thing!.... BAH! HUM-BUG!..She needs to learn to set his priorities..!!
I would rather put a rookie next to him then Robinson on Left side. If he can't handle it with a good rookie he don't need to be there
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the line start off as Long / Saffold / Wells / Joseph / Barksdale, then remain that way until Robinson got his first start in the San Francisco MNF game, at which point Saffold moved to RG, then in the third game with Saffold at RG (Kansas City) Long got injured, so Joseph came back in as RG. So all in all he played next to Saffold for 2.5 games.
A good rookie would be fine as the left or Right Guard IMO. It would have to be a top Guard though, like Scherf. But that is why Blalock would be a great signing. He knows Boudreau and what he wants his linemen to do. He is a LG and could help GRob until the rookie is up to speed. So if the Rams only sign Blalock they could have a vet at both Guard spots to coach rookies. If they get Blalock and either Barksdale or Wiz then it is all the better. Blalock should be the cheapest signing and to me the highest priority. Then one of the others would be gravy on top.
Remember Saffold can play RT if Barks doesnt resign with the Rams. I would prefer he play OG, but he is capable of playing any of the 4 non center positions and he had his shoulder worked on this off season so he should be at the best health wise we have seen since he became a Ram. Saffold gives the Rams some flexability as far as FA and draft.
Saffold couldn't stay healthy at OG, either. He just played through it. I no longer trust Saffold's health at any position.Saffold can't stay healthy more than a game or two playing tackle for some reason and while he is a OK tackle the short time he can play there he is an ELITE guard when hes playing that position. I would really rather not go into the season expecting saffold to start at RT all year.
We saw a 2014 active Bou game plan take place last season when they selected the very young & inexperienced Greg Robinson. Bou worked GR inside & outside on the left side. Now many pointed this out at the conclusion of the season as why GR was rated so poorly as a rookie. I do not agree with their ratings nor their documented reasoning. I feel that that plan was good for the Rams team! I also feel it worked well for GR too.
Reason I bring this up Elmgrovegnome on your post is whomever Snead/Fisher select as their top OL'ers may run the same plan as we saw with GR. If for example if Blalock is the only UFA signing he would be a certain plug in @ LEFT OG. Depending on what OL'er is selected OT or OG they have Saffold who could slide outside @ ORT & let the new rookie play inside @ ORG (AJ Cann or a La'el Collins or a Laken Tomlinson or even TJ Clemmings).
Yes to me the UFA Blalock signing would provide Bou many options in TC & pre season. The Stefon Wisniewski signing would not be a bad one either as I have said I would look to plug Wisniewski in @ OLG myself so I could get the same effect as we could get with the Blalock signing. I think just happen to think that Wisniewski is a better OLG than OC but that's just me. The thing with Wisniewski is if the Rams have total failure with Barrett Jones or Rhaney or Tim Barnes then he can move inside to OC post to help stabilize it.
Yep. The sad thing here is Saffold is our best & most trusted Ram OL'er. Just shows a true BRIGHT light on just how bad the current Ram OL situation is.Saffold couldn't stay healthy at OG, either. He just played through it. I no longer trust Saffold's health at any position.
I not where you are at Robocop yet & since I have a big dislike @ paying for used up aged, declining UFA's.... I am not in panic mode yet. But if Fisher runs out another poor awful starting OL like he did in 2012-2013 & 2014.... I am not sure I can run with him any longer.if Snisher fucks this up I swear. we have THREE starting roles to fill. stop dicking around and start hitting them hard. we don't have the luxury of seeing how this all plays out and 'make due'. they completely half-assed it last year assuming that paper thin line was good enough. you can't put two rookies on the line this year straight out of the draft. I'm fed up with this situation every year. yea FA isn't over but when it is and the draft is and if our line still looks pathetic then I'll lose faith in Snisher.
Looks to me & if I were in his shoes & I have a serious defensive resume myself I would turn my attention to the area that really needs it & let those experienced defensive coaches use their talent to develop some less talented players & get some offensive OL'ers with talent in that damn OL for once.
A good rookie would be fine as the left or Right Guard IMO. It would have to be a top Guard though, like Scherf. But that is why Blalock would be a great signing. He knows Boudreau and what he wants his linemen to do. He is a LG and could help GRob until the rookie is up to speed.
So if the Rams only sign Blalock they could have a vet at both Guard spots to coach rookies. If they get Blalock and either Barksdale or Wiz then it is all the better.
Blalock should be the cheapest signing and to me the highest priority. Then one of the others would be gravy on top.
Merlin I'm one of your biggest fans as I've been reading your posts for decades and even look down a long thread and just read your reply over others but I just can't agree on the infamous coach Boudreau who is almost a legend , and I'm wondering after his full stint with us WHY? Who has he improved? Maybe Barksdale a little from picking him from the Raiders but he is still lacking and went backwards last year. Everyone wants to give him a pass because of playing next to Joseph and Wells who both Melted down to the wick. It was pitifull.I'm of the opinion that Coach Boudreau knows what he's doing. That what is needed is TALENT for him to work with. Not another overpaid vet on his last legs with the hope he can pass some knowledge down.
If they're gonna get a FA OL I prefer it's a young player. If not, just draft the bejeezus out of it and let our excellent OL coach do what he does.
I'm of the opinion that Coach Boudreau knows what he's doing. That what is needed is TALENT for him to work with. Not another overpaid vet on his last legs with the hope he can pass some knowledge down.
If they're gonna get a FA OL I prefer it's a young player. If not, just draft the bejeezus out of it and let our excellent OL coach do what he does.
if Snisher fucks this up I swear. we have THREE starting roles to fill. stop dicking around and start hitting them hard. we don't have the luxury of seeing how this all plays out and 'make due'. they completely half-assed it last year assuming that paper thin line was good enough. you can't put two rookies on the line this year straight out of the draft. I'm fed up with this situation every year. yea FA isn't over but when it is and the draft is and if our line still looks pathetic then I'll lose faith in Snisher.