- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- Messages
- 10,307
Re: Bam bam Cunningham
That. Not sure how anyone can see Pead as a clear anything. Sure he looked good at cincy. So did Marty Gilyard. So far he has looked sub par at this level. I see the elusiveness at times, but please. A CLEAR #2?? What does that say about our rb stable?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
mojorizen7 said:Right now Pead is a project.(hyperbole,but hear me out) No different than someone like Quick,except that Pead should be much further ahead than guys like Stacy and Cunningham. He isn't. IMO he's not the clear #2,with the exception of his pass protection.
I dont know the numbers but he's had a TON of opportunities to touch the ball in preseason and has literally dropped the ball. Not a fan of Pead. The other backs play like they want it. Pead plays like he wants out at times.
I suppose the 2nd rd tag will continue to give him plenty of chances...
That. Not sure how anyone can see Pead as a clear anything. Sure he looked good at cincy. So did Marty Gilyard. So far he has looked sub par at this level. I see the elusiveness at times, but please. A CLEAR #2?? What does that say about our rb stable?
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2