fearsomefour
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 18,004
Nope. Seahawks cheating asses can suck it. Bailey is innocent of PEDs he said so, the team said so, and I believe them.Disappointing and sucks.
Going forward can we agree when it comes to this kind of stuff we are no different than the Seahawks or anyone else.
Worst as in least talented? Far from it.So does the loss of Bailey now tip us over the edge as the worst group of receivers in the NFL?
Only ones I think come close:
Cleveland - Have a better TE than anything we have
Jaguars - Added two receivers in the second round of the draft
Chiefs
Vikings
Panthers
And it's really just splitting hairs between the 5/6 of us.
Worst as in least talented? Far from it.
So does the loss of Bailey now tip us over the edge as the worst group of receivers in the NFL?
Only ones I think come close:
Cleveland - Have a better TE than anything we have
Jaguars - Added two receivers in the second round of the draft
Chiefs
Vikings
Panthers
And it's really just splitting hairs between the 5/6 of us.
Well theNope. Seahawks cheating asses can suck it. Bailey is innocent of PEDs he said so, the team said so, and I believe them.
WV guys arnt all heros, just humanFor the crap we give Seattle about PEDs, we seem to have our own little problem.
3 guys in 3 years to start the year suspended.
I haven't went through the entire 10 page (and counting thread) but does anyone know if Snisher were aware of this before the draft? They indicated previously with respect to other players who violated that they knew. Now maybe they think what they have is sufficient to get them through games 1-4. Maybe they make a trade/pick up during TC. Or maybe they run even more 2-3 TE sets. Still, if they knew about this before hand and didn't take ANY WR of consequence it does make me wonder a bit about putting so much emphasis on such an unproven and inconsistent young group. However, maybe they thought drafting another one just adds to that unproven/inconsistent stuff. IDK
i used to grow it, permanently suspended? happy you aint the DudeI see you guys are admitting to smoking pot, I'm afraid I'm going to have to suspend you guys from the board indefinitely without pay..
For a few months they were aware of it, IIRC.They have said that they were aware of the situation.
OK................... stay pissy my friend............... but the point stands it's a temporary issue and your solution is knee jerk and serves a point you'd concluded before ,fits your assumptive world etc.,can we get a time frame on how long you are going to grind this ax?
The question still remains...My "fix" wasn't temporary, nor was it brought on by the Bailey situation...just exasperated by it. The wr's are a mess, especially the outside-the-numbers guys. People can pretend all they want that "the young guys are getting better, blah, blah, blah.." but the facts are there is SERIOUS doubt Quick ever gets it, Pettis is a JAG and Givens is a one trick pony who is not comfortable catching the ball in traffic.
The issue should have been addressed with Watkins, if they chose to ignore the obvious, which they did, then (against my beliefs) they should have drafted the next highest wr when the opportunity presented itself like it did through the first 4 rounds.
Trust me I'll be right here to say I was wrong if Quick, Givens and Pettis ARE much better...if they are not then more and more people will be saying what I have.
Thordaddy said:can we get a time frame on how long you are going to grind this ax?