JoeBo21
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2013
- Messages
- 2,557
Strange because Mo Alexander wasn't really on my radar as a guy I thought they would ditch.Players are being held accountable for a change, Mo Alexander anyone.
I have done a 180 on Snead since the season began.I'd take Kevin Colbert and the Steelers brass over anyone, followed by McCarthy and Ted Thompson in Green Bay.
View attachment 22174
It is possible that the teams they went to had bad coaches as well... but 0-2 makes me thiink it's more about the player than the coaches.What if Greg, Brian Q., Kenny B., and others (Zack S., that other RB....hell the 2...forgot their names...one had a car accident) ...those wrs....all of them...what if they were brought in here with McVay and his crew...and spent their developmental years under them???? Careers changed?! Maybe...oh yea, that's Daryl Richardson and Isiah Pead...but careers could possibly be changed...because, those dudes could play....Cook...Kendricks...
So DET has terrible coaches too?I have very little doubt that Greg Robinson, in the hands of competent coaches, could have become a dominant run blocking offensive lineman.
Again, so DET's coaches couldn't "undo" the damage that Coach Boo did? I find that a tad hard to swallow. More logical to me is... he's just not that good. If I remember correctly, I was behind the drafting of him but, after years of ineptitude and bone-headed penalties, I had to face facts.That's all coach Boo messing him up.
I have no doubt about this... I don't believe anything would have changed.If Fish was still here, I'd bet that G-Rob would still be starting!!! Probably along with Britt and Quick
and the biggest addition by subtraction was Fisher.
Not sure if Newsome or Harbaugh is losing a step but the Ravens roster has been quietly pedestrian these past few years
I'd take Kevin Colbert and the Steelers brass over anyone, followed by McCarthy and Ted Thompson in Green Bay.
I don't know if he would have been any good but I still don't understand why they didn't at least try him at guard.
Football IQ. In this scheme, the OG needs to have intelligence and instincts. I expect that Kromer didn't believe he could execute his assignments.
I'd take Kevin Colbert and the Steelers brass over anyone, followed by McCarthy and Ted Thompson in Green Bay.
View attachment 22174
You know that Aaron Donald didnt go top 10 because there were concerns about his size, ability to transcend to the NFL level. Pretty sure that worked outexactly this....
Picking players on potential alone is what gets teams in trouble. I couldn't have said this better myself. I don't know how these GM's or coaches get caught up in this. For example i don't know how a players stock rises after the combine. They have all the game film in the world on most players, this alone should be enough to answer most questions. Are there exceptions? Sure, but you don't pick a player like Quick in the 2nd round. You pick him in the 5th round or later.
It still is mind blowing what happened with Grob, I never saw a pure LT when watching his film. I saw a mediocre Guard at best. I remember yelling at my TV when we picked him over Mathews. That pick alone should have gotten Snead fired IMO.
Yeah... I was one of those that had concerns over his size... made sense. Glad I was wrong.You know that Aaron Donald didnt go top 10 because there were concerns about his size, ability to transcend to the NFL level. Pretty sure that worked out
You know that Aaron Donald didnt go top 10 because there were concerns about his size, ability to transcend to the NFL level. Pretty sure that worked out
True, but I also think that "majority" is a subjective thing. Its hard to put a number on what is reasonable. 50%? 80%?Yeah... I was one of those that had concerns over his size... made sense. Glad I was wrong.
There will always be exceptions... just have to hit on a majority.
Which is what? Most of the best players don't play in the senior bowl...and shouldn't due to the injury risks involved.This year draft shows what Senior Bowl players mean to the draft process.
You too ehhh Les?He was not smart enough to do well.
Ummmm, not sure about Detroit....I'll say this, several players, once exposed to the wrong way to do things, cannot simply change overnight, and do the "right" thing. Or definitely not right away. Lets give it some time. I'll always remember, after working with LeCharles Bentley, G-Rob seemed to improve...then progressively got worse over the season....So DET has terrible coaches too?
Not right away....I watched some highlights of the Lions last game when he was benched...pressure was coming from EVERYWHERE....even that highly touted RT was giving up sacks. Yet, for some reason, Greg was singled out and benched. Did he deserve it? Probably...but so did about 3 others. I still expect Detroit to win that division...with Greg as a starter.Again, so DET's coaches couldn't "undo" the damage that Coach Boo did?
I dunno... seems like the remaining (I'll say "picked") Olinesmen for the Rams seem to be improving... saw it from game one and they seem to continue to improve.Ummmm, not sure about Detroit....I'll say this, several players, once exposed to the wrong way to do things, cannot simply change overnight, and do the "right" thing. Or definitely not right away. Lets give it some time. I'll always remember, after working with LeCharles Bentley, G-Rob seemed to improve...then progressively got worse over the season....
Well, first things first... he'll have to get reinserted back as starter. I see that as a huge challenge for him at this point.Not right away....I watched some highlights of the Lions last game when he was benched...pressure was coming from EVERYWHERE....even that highly touted RT was giving up sacks. Yet, for some reason, Greg was singled out and benched. Did he deserve it? Probably...but so did about 3 others. I still expect Detroit to win that division...with Greg as a starter.
please, not on Rams DI've always felt Greg Robinson would have made a great DT/NT... not much intelligence is needed on DL.
The better athletes play Defense as it's more reaction that anything. Saw it once on NFL Top 100 too, was hilarious.
Well, just me.. but I'd say you ought to be hitting on at least 50% (talent of various rounds get taken into consideration... ought to be hitting much higher on early rounds, not as much in later rounds... so 50% all in).True, but I also think that "majority" is a subjective thing. Its hard to put a number on what is reasonable. 50%? 80%?
"Well enough" seems fair... defense? Very good. Offense? More hit-and-miss.I'd say the Fisher/Snead era drafted well enough,
You mean had they been drafted elsewhere initially, right? Yeah... who knows. What I am confident about are the players McVay let go and how they are doing elsewhere. And Robinson and Quick are not doing much of anything, so I'm gonna say it wouldn't have mattered with those two.... I think history is gonna prove they just aren't NFL caliber.the consistent failure of the offense its hard to figure if the players who busted may have been successful elsewhere.
Well, he's going backward in DET, no? Are you of the same theory as LACHAMP46 that he was ruined by the Rams coaches? Do you think he'll recover from that and be successful the rest of his career? I feel strongly he'll fizzle out and disappear from the NFL landscape.I still contend that GRob's failure was on the Rams staff.
Of course we would... we have that right!! We're silly fans!And had the Rams taken Matthews, he'd be the bust and Grob would be the guy "we should taken"
He was dominant as a rookie when he played guard. Due to need and his salary, I feel he was forced to play OLT.Well, he's going backward in DET, no? Are you of the same theory as LACHAMP46 that he was ruined by the Rams coaches? Do you think he'll recover from that and be successful the rest of his career? I feel strongly he'll fizzle out and disappear from the NFL landscape.