Any remaining doubters that QB is our biggest draft need?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

blackbart

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
6,291
Name
Tim
Foles is a pro bowl Qb.

We need oline and Wr's.

End of story.

No Qb could have success with this cast. How many dropped passes today? It's ridiculous.

Cook Britt and quick are bush league.

Don't get me started on the oline.
Foles WAS a Pro Bowl QB he is no longer and there were a lot more shitty passes than drops today
 

nighttrain

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
9,216
Man, I hate to say it, but it's looking like our 1st rounder will have to be a QB.

I was hoping that it could be a stud WR, DE, or MLB.

But we aren't even functional without a decent QB. We see the evidence every single week, don't we? Our O seems so helpless and it's getting worse each week.

It's starting to look like we may have a top 5 pick.

I know. I can barely type those words, much less accept them. But it doesn't make them less true.

Heck, we may have to think about an OT in the 2nd, as well.

Then again, can Fisher or his crack O coaching staff properly develop a talented QB? I dunno...

Man, I am so depressed. This is starting to feel like those Frontiere years before the GSOT...
I'd like to see Mannion start the rest of this season, then make a qb decision
train
 

bluecollarram

Starter
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
780
Name
Dave
Foles is a pro bowl Qb.
giphy.gif
 

Stel

Starter
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
744
Man, I hate to say it, but it's looking like our 1st rounder will have to be a QB.

I was hoping that i..
Man, I hate to say it, but it's looking like our 1st rounder will have to be a QB.

Approaching the draft with that goal is a recipe for a bad draft.

Do I think we need a QB? Yes.
Does our first round pick have to be a QB? No.
 

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
12,086
Name
Charlie
If Foles is a pro bowl quarterback, then Rosie O'Donnell is a supermodel porn star. :eek::shocked: :puke:
 

rfa77

UDFA
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
18
QB is obviously a huge we'd for us. You can't do anything without a competent one. I think it is our biggest need. I wouldn't however necessarily draft one with our first round pick if the guy I thought was gong to be the guy wasn't available. If there's a franchise QB on the board and you don't have one-absolutely you've gotta draft him. I'd he's not that good don't reach. Wishful thinking isn't going to turn him into one. We still have huge holes at WR and offensive line also, so take bpa in the first unless the franchise QB of the future is a sure fire prospect who you've really done your one work n and really like.

Spot on. I'm absolutely amazed at those who include defense as draft needs at this point. Can there always be improvement? Of course? But, the defense is good enough where it stands, especially if Quinn, Ogletree, and Gaines are healthy next year. Rams need offense - and somebody who knows how to evaluate offensive talent. Obviously, they don't.
 

rfa77

UDFA
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
18
If we get Hue Jackson, Connor Cook will be a nice addition. Hopefully Fisher will be fired by the end of the season because I trust him developing a quarterback as much as I trust a baby holding a knife.

EDIT: Pretty sad how this is my 1000th post

No kidding. Drafting offense with high picks doesn't guarantee squat. You have to know how to evaluate the talent. And, subsequently, coach them.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,770
Approaching the draft with that goal is a recipe for a bad draft.

Do I think we need a QB? Yes.
Does our first round pick have to be a QB? No.

I disagree. If they feel a top QB is attainable they should go all in on attaining him. QB is the only position I think teams have to have that attitude about.
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
14,462
Name
Bo Bowen
I don't know what makes you guys think we won't be drafting very high next year. 6-10 is starting to look like our ceiling and 5-11 might be closer to the truth. Im thinking that might be top 5. We are looking at about 7 right now.
 

Ballhawk

Please don't confuse my experience for pessimism!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
2,283
Name
NPW
Spot on. I'm absolutely amazed at those who include defense as draft needs at this point. Can there always be improvement? Of course? But, the defense is good enough where it stands, especially if Quinn, Ogletree, and Gaines are healthy next year. Rams need offense - and somebody who knows how to evaluate offensive talent. Obviously, they don't.
We always can use a couple more DTs! And we better be looking for a back up punter early in the draft as well!
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
@Rams43
eheheheheh, LOL...I mean, was their any doubt? Seriously, if you want to be a playoff team, it matters how you play in big games...esp at the QB position...I felt something at Green Bay...
QB is definitely a huge need. Whether or not it is worth investing a top 5 pick.... I do not know. It will depend on the prospect(s) available. Do any of the top ranked QBs available e.g. Jared Goff look like they could be future stars? If yes, definitely draft them. Nothing is a sure thing. But if they seem to have a real chance at becoming great you have to roll the dice.
Roll the dice...if this was 1983, you can do that waiting game with QB's, but if you like one, you better go get him....And yea, Goff looks like he's possible... and that's all you can hope for. No sure things

Drafting offense with high picks doesn't guarantee squat.
Nope, but at QB, it sure helps...O-line, certain positions sure help...but as I just said, no sure thing in drafting...but drafting earlier helps. Don't over-think it so much...safe picks (Havenstein types) really help balance the wow picks (Tavon, G-Rob)...
The best QB on our board, we should target...It shouldn't be hard this year....we may over pick if we have a great pick, but so what...And if we have a chance, we should trade up...At least you can have "your guy"...
 

Yamahopper

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
3,838
Yeah all in on QB this year unless Mannion lights it up. But Mannion won't get a chance unless Foles and Keenum both go down.
I don't see the Rams win another game so they should be in position with their 1st or with a trade up.
Don't care the cost.
 

Stel

Starter
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
744
I disagree. If they feel a top QB is attainable they should go all in on attaining him. QB is the only position I think teams have to have that attitude about.

I don't disagree, but the "if" is important. It is the difference between going into the draft wanting to draft a QB and thinking you have to draft a QB in the first round.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
7,352
Approaching the draft with that goal is a recipe for a bad draft.

Do I think we need a QB? Yes.
Does our first round pick have to be a QB? No.

Agreed. The QB position probably has the most busts in the first round due to teams just selecting one of fill a need. If there isn't one the team deems worthy of the selection, they are better off selecting a higher graded player and seeing what they can do in the next few rounds.

I'd be sick if the Rams passed on the next J.J. Watt, Tyron Smith, or Robert Quinn just to select the next Jake Locker or Blaine Gabbert because of a need at QB.
 

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
11,337
Name
Scott
Agreed. The QB position probably has the most busts in the first round due to teams just selecting one of fill a need. If there isn't one the team deems worthy of the selection, they are better off selecting a higher graded player and seeing what they can do in the next few rounds.

I'd be sick if the Rams passed on the next J.J. Watt, Tyron Smith, or Robert Quinn just to select the next Jake Locker or Blaine Gabbert because of a need at QB.
I'll also be pissed if we move up to draft a guy like Joyner and pass on a guy like D. Carr.
.....again
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,669
This team has zero chance to win out. That means they have every reason to play Mannion now and see what they have in the kid. A five game run to close out the season is a nice look to see whether he's gonna compete with the QB they draft.

The Rams ARE drafting a QB. No way around it. Question is level of desperation, which right now can go from "Nuclear Holocaust" to "Desperate" if the kid can do some good things over the next 5.

Oh and Stan might need to twist Fish's arm here... No coach wants to lose but in this case every game the team loses with the kid in there at QB reduces cost of moving up. It's Mannion time, Fisher just hasn't realized it yet. Hopefully he won't need urging, because Keenum's no better than Foles.
 

Tron

Fights for the User
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,836
Name
Tron
For the love that is all holy and sacred, please draft Goff this year. At the pace we are going, we wont even have to trade up for him!!

Would love to see some Mannion out there to see if he could actually be a future starter for us, but knowing Fisher, would take both Foles and Keenum to be injured before playing him regardless of how badly they play.
 

Dr C. Hill

Rookie
Joined
Jun 17, 2014
Messages
355
Name
Doc
I would hate to give up all of the blood and treasure it would cost to move up for a QB. What if the answer is already on the roster? Mannion is a player IMO. The only thing he doesn't have is a cannon for an arm. Next to Foles though, he looks like Elway! He is a smart kid, a coach's kid, who understands the offense and would do anything to get better.