That's a great point, and I was thinking that same exact thing during the game.
The same. exact. thing.
I thought to myself, "Self, maybe it's time they keyed on fundamentally sound football players in the draft now."
Actually, I think the move toward players like Havenstein was very much to mitigate development issues. Because...they aren't as good at development as they think.
Wentz was Havenstein, Goff...GRob. It's not really arguable that Goff has the higher upside, but is much more raw. So now, the ultimate question isn't where the ceiling is...but...can you develop that player to convert that potential? And we're talking about Fisher...not Mike McCarthy...or Josh McDaniel...or Jim Bob Cooter...or...you get the idea.
When it came to the QB question, Fisher...and I say Fisher not Snisher... was still in GRob mode...under the delusion that he had the skillz to develop a pure passer QB.
Now is this a Goff/Wentz commentary? No. Goff is our QB of the future. Keenum's our QB for now. What this is is a commentary about Fisher and how he's not nearly as self aware as he needs to be to be successful.
If we were going to stick with Fisher indefinitely, they shoulda taken Wentz. Period...cuz...well, does anyone need to see anything more about his development of offensive personnel?
However, if we can get a new coaching regime that CAN develop offensive personnel, then I'm downright excited about Goff and his potential.
However, you'll forgive me if the pairing of Fisher and Goff leave me less than excited... NOT because I don't have faith in Goff. I do...just like I did in Bradford. But, I DO NOT have faith in Fisher, specifically that outside of a few positions, he simply does not develop players, nor establish a coherent team philosophy nor consistent team play. Not from unit to unit or even week to week...