FrankenRam
Starter
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
- Messages
- 526
I like Jeff Fisher and I believe his teams plays hard for him overall. I also liked his draft picks and strategy and trades. The Rams have been decimated by injuries over the last three years. Unfortunately, the offense is so bad in fisher's fourth year that the organization needs to make a change at the end of the season. Of course I will be hoping that the Rams somehow manage to win out the rest of their schedule, and save Fisher's job, but I don't think that's gonna happen. Just my opinion.
There does seem to be an inevitability in the ways things are going, doesn't there.
IMO, Fisher has a bit too much of a riverboat gambler in him for his own good when it comes to player acquisition. It seems particularly acute when it comes to the draft, but has also been a factor in some FA acquisitions as well.
For example.....at the time they were signed, both Wells and Jake Long were risks given their injury history. Signing them was a gamble. Had either one of them paid off, things would almost certainly be considerably different today. And if they both had paid off, we'd be sitting pretty right now. In both cases, I kinda puckered up at the risk Fisher was taking in signing each. But for an OL in desperate need of a quick infusion of talent, I understood the strategy. Risky....or 'riverboat gamblery', but not crazy either. Unfortunately, the gamble didn't pay off in either case.
When it comes to the draft, it seems like he always values upside over 'solid consistent contributor' types. See Pead, Quick, and probably GRob. Maybe thrown in others like Joyner, and even Tavon to a degree (although it does appear TA is finally paying off this year). And while risks, or 'projects', can and should be taken occasionally, I think there's some balance needed in doing so....especially with early round picks.
Combine this sort of gambling approach to player acquisition and his willingness to be very aggressive with his defensive strategy, his seeming pretty conservative philosophy of offensive strategy is rather puzzling.