Mackeyser
Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2013
- Messages
- 14,536
- Name
- Mack
If they called them straight up, they'd all stop doing it so much.
My sales reps turn in about 100 2-Page applications per week. My office staff was sick of having to waste their time and complete about 20 per week, which was the sales reps responsibility. After months of the staff begging the reps to please turn in completed apps, they gave up.
I implemented a processing fee of $25 per app to the sales rep, and Bam, none of the apps had errors. This was 6 months ago, and still wirking well. Only getting about 5 errors/incomplete apps per month vs. a 100.
So do the same for holding!!!! Call the Penalty!!!
That's how I feel about it...
It'd take awhile to adjust, but the NFL would adjust... and then it wouldn't matter who the refs were and what their predilections were.
In baseball, it all sorts of averages out considering the 162 games, but you can see how big a deal it is come the NLCS/ALCS and WS.
The NFL only has 16 games to determine the playoffs. That's a really small sample size where even one game that's called different can change the entire course of the season.
Imagine an OL that's playing well and has had 3 straight crews who "let them play" and only called holding if an OL took a Defender to the ground. Then in the 4th week, you get a crew that calls the game tighter. We've seen it in games where all of a sudden, the team has 4 holding penalties and they've literally done NOTHING different.
That's what's frustrating. I want my Rams to win because they are the best team in the NFL, not because they did or didn't get the benefit of calls. Otherwise, the outcome is based far too much on randomness outside of either team's control or the outcome is based on something else.
I think we'd all prefer it be based purely on the play of the teams with uniform rule enforcement throughout.