Fair enough. I'm just gonna say I disagree and think that Keenum can get better. There are other parallels I can draw, but that doesn't seem to be well met around here. And I can demonstrate with very specific timelines why Keenum didn't get a fair shake in Houston, but that doesn't matter either. At this point we're just trying to make arguments that reinforce how we view Keenum as a quarterback, but I'm no longer interested in defending the guy against people who want to close the book on him. It's all good though, Jrry. "I ain't even mad doe."
On a side note, I've spent a couple of hours today going through all the preseason games because I was gonna make a video of all of Goff's throws. And with the intention of showing how good they were, because I really am looking forward to the day he starts. BUT. I honestly forgot how ugly it was, so I'm not gonna do that now. I can really see (and understand) why the coaching staff is taking the approach they're taking with him. He was SO not ready to step in right away. As average as Keenum is, he really and truly did give us the best chance to not lose. Notice I didn't say win. Goff would have cost us games if he started. And not just the first one either. You can see the arm talent there, but you can also see the lack of FBI. Being on the sideilnes of these games, and then going through film review is going to help him establish a comfort zone when he finally gets out there. He's not getting plays from the sidelines anymore, and there's not a lot of man coverage. He's gonna have to run with the two pass plays and two run plays he brings to the LOS and then make the determination of what to call based on what he sees. An under front cover 3 or an over front cover 2 will have two different plays, and a check, and then he'll have to understand the WR sight-adjustments post-snap. No way he had that stuff down during preseason. Absolutely no conceivable way. But he will. I've been reading a lot about him, and he's no dummy. Shouldn't be long now.
