The Eagles are due for one helluva ass whoopin from us Oct. 4.![]()
Yes, hope the boys dont take the foot off the gas pedal like they did Week 3 last season (wont happen with our D, THIS year). That cost us the 1-seed/Super Bowl.
The Eagles are due for one helluva ass whoopin from us Oct. 4.![]()
My main point is that there is no longer any rule preventing non-veterans from being put on IR prior to the season. If they thought it wasn't serious, they could have put him on IR on cut down day and used the designation to return. You already posted that in 2024 the league made a change where teams could designate up to 2 people to return on cut down day. If they really wanted him they didn't have to subject him to waivers.1) Yes, the second-round pick Bisontis has a serious injury and cannot come back this year per the IR rule. Lampkin's injury was not considered significant. The Rams were likely hoping he could come back later in the season had he passed waivers. It's not the same situation as far as valuing/protecting the second-round pick compared to an undrafted free agent out of college. They would not expose him to the waiver wire.
- Under NFL rules, because he went straight to IR during training camp, he was officially ruled out for the entire season. Even if his MCL heals perfectly in November, he is legally barred from playing a single snap for Arizona until next year. [1, 2, 3]
![]()
Chase Bisontis Placed On Injured Reserve After Knee Injury
Rookie guard done for season; Keys, Geers also to IRwww.azcardinals.com
2) Gemini and I dropped the ball on Roberts. The Lampkin date was a typo.
That makes it only four times since 2012 that the Unwritten Rule was ignored.
teams can now place two players on injured reserve during the cutdown date who can later be designated for return during the season.
This new tweak should allow teams to carry two players whom they don’t want to expose to waivers but would have had to in the past because of the old rule.
Roseman lover.I think they took Lampkin partially because I don't think they were happy when we picked up McMahon a yr earlier. The local beat writers thought McMahon would make their roster. They tried to get him to their PS with your basic waiver then re-sign, but the Rans signed him to their active roster. All legit, no "rules" broken, but I think that didn't sit well with Roseman.
I thought you said you were stepping away from this tired take. Do us a favor and help put out any remaining embers.Should be a ban on any and all gentlemen/unwritten rules. If you love a player so much, roster him, then IR him. No shenanigans.
Example: lets say Dean Connors shows out in preseason Week 2. Rams love him. Then tears his ACL Week 3 and is out for the year. If you LOVE him enough and think he cam still be a strong contributor to the 2027 team and beyond, DONT WAIVE HIM then. If you waive him, you risk. And also, didn't know that, as Philly pointed out, it was the Rams that may started have this quagmire. But again, Rams did NOTHING wrong in claiming a player another team wants on PS that they then put on an ACTIVE roster. All these teams need to stop crying and just follow procedural rules.
I thought you said you were stepping away from this tired take. Do us a favor and help put out any remaining embers.
Thanks for pointing that out. The Rams chose Murch and Hunter Long to go to IR that year. It's only two players.My main point is that there is no longer any rule preventing non-veterans from being put on IR prior to the season. If they thought it wasn't serious, they could have put him on IR on cut down day and used the designation to return. You already posted that in 2024 the league made a change where teams could designate up to 2 people to return on cut down day. If they really wanted him they didn't have to subject him to waivers.
Should be a ban on any and all gentlemen/unwritten rules. If you love a player so much, roster him, then IR him. No shenanigans.
Example: lets say Dean Connors shows out in preseason Week 2. Rams love him. Then tears his ACL Week 3 and is out for the year. If you LOVE him enough and think he cam still be a strong contributor to the 2027 team and beyond, DONT WAIVE HIM then. If you waive him, you risk. And also, didn't know that, as Philly pointed out, it was the Rams that may started have this quagmire. But again, Rams did NOTHING wrong in claiming a player another team wants on PS that they then put on an ACTIVE roster. All these teams need to stop crying and just follow procedural rules.
Hopefully he'll calm down once that Eagles jersey shows up in the mail.I thought you said you were stepping away from this tired take. Do us a favor and help put out any remaining embers.
Long wasn't on the team last season. He signed with the Jags in free agency. They didn't put any player on IR on cut down day. They had options, 3, to keep Lampkin.Thanks for pointing that out. The Rams chose Murch and Hunter Long to go to IR that year. It's only two players.
Waived, No Recall OL A.J. Arcuri, OL Wyatt Bowles, WR Britain Covey, WR Tru Edwards, DT Jack Heflin, S Tanner Ingle, OLB Brennan Jackson, CB Derion Kendrick, CB Cam Lampkin, OL Dylan McMahon, OLB Jamil Muhammad, ILB Elias Neal, DL Bill Norton, ILB Chris "Pooh" Paul Jr., WR Brennan Presley, TE Mark Redman, RB Ronnie Rivers, RB Cody Schrader, WR Drake Stoops, S Nate Valcarcel, RB Jordan Waters, CB Charles Woods.
Terminated, Vested Veteran, all contracts CB A.J. Green.
Waived/Injured OL Willie Lampkin IV, CB Shaun Jolly
Hopefully he'll calm down once that Eagles jersey shows up in the mail.
You're right. I was running a long thread with Gemini, which is a bad idea.Long wasn't on the team last season. He signed with the Jags in free agency. They didn't put any player on IR on cut down day. They had options, 3, to keep Lampkin.
Cut down day 08/26
I know that was sarcasm.... and yeah, I get tired of the "Howie is cooking" crap. The guy just uses the credit card approach to the cap, hoping it keeps increasing enough to avert disaster down the road.Roseman lover.
Good keep him out of the NFC West.![]()
BREAKING: Bucs Reach Agreement With DT Vita Vea On One-Year, $30 Million Extension
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers and DT Vita Vea have reached and agreement on a one-year, $30 million extension that will keep him in Tampa Bay for the next two seasons, according to Adam Schefter. Veanfltraderumors.co
Well this thread does have, ".... and more" in the title so technically this is thatHoly cow
Can this thread please go back to what its for thank you very much. Start a Lamkin thread or a thread about being wrong using Ai if you want
I think they took Lampkin partially because I don't think they were happy when we picked up McMahon a yr earlier. The local beat writers thought McMahon would make their roster. They tried to get him to their PS with your basic waiver then re-sign, but the Rans signed him to their active roster. All legit, no "rules" broken, but I think that didn't sit well with Roseman.
If I was FORCED to get one, i would get:
Current- DeJean 32
Former- Jackson 29
Gimme yours, all.....