OFFICIAL 2026 NFL News: Trades, cuts, free agency, and more

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

View: https://x.com/adamschefter/status/2028919055491514633?s=61&t=lgp1gRmUcyNSF5v7CIHwMg


Trey Hendrickson — Sacks per game started vs NFL history (copy/paste) per ChatGPT.

TREY HENDRICKSON (career)
  • Career sacks: 81
  • Career games started: 88
  • Sacks per start: 81 ÷ 88 = 0.92
HOW THAT STACKS UP HISTORICALLY (sacks per game started; minimum 70 starts — benchmark list)
  1. T.J. Watt — 0.91
  2. Reggie White — 0.85
  3. Chandler Jones — 0.79
  4. DeMarcus Ware — 0.78
  5. Von Miller — 0.76
  6. Aaron Donald — 0.76
  7. J.J. Watt — 0.76
WHERE HENDRICKSON FITS
  • Hendrickson’s 0.92 per start would rank ABOVE the #1 on that list (T.J. Watt at 0.91), i.e., “best all-time” by this specific metric using the same minimum-starts threshold.
REFERENCE POINT (another all-time great)
  • Aaron Donald: 111 sacks / 150 starts = 0.74
 
  • Like
  • Shock
Reactions: Merlin and JonRam99
CGI_Ram said:

View: https://x.com/adamschefter/status/2028919055491514633?s=61&t=lgp1gRmUcyNSF5v7CIHwMg


Trey Hendrickson — Sacks per game started vs NFL history (copy/paste) per ChatGPT.

TREY HENDRICKSON (career)
  • Career sacks: 81
  • Career games started: 88
  • Sacks per start: 81 ÷ 88 = 0.92
HOW THAT STACKS UP HISTORICALLY (sacks per game started; minimum 70 starts — benchmark list)
  1. T.J. Watt — 0.91
  2. Reggie White — 0.85
  3. Chandler Jones — 0.79
  4. DeMarcus Ware — 0.78
  5. Von Miller — 0.76
  6. Aaron Donald — 0.76
  7. J.J. Watt — 0.76
WHERE HENDRICKSON FITS
  • Hendrickson’s 0.92 per start would rank ABOVE the #1 on that list (T.J. Watt at 0.91), i.e., “best all-time” by this specific metric using the same minimum-starts threshold.
REFERENCE POINT (another all-time great)
  • Aaron Donald: 111 sacks / 150 starts = 0.74
Click to expand...

Bengals joke organization. Burrow just needs to suffer a little longer until Stafford retires.

View: https://x.com/wingoz/status/2028924830331084948?s=20
 
  • Like
  • HaHa
Reactions: JonRam99, kurtfaulk, CGI_Ram and 1 other person
Flatlyner said:
I could see the Rams making an offer, not sure I'd be totally for it however. He's better then Young, but how much better? If we are swinging a trade, give me a stud CB IMO. Stewart was looking quite effective last season which gives us 3 quality edge's. Do we have any quality CB's?
Click to expand...
NO
 
Psycho_X said:
This is a Jets signing if I've ever seen one.
Click to expand...
For league minimum while the Cardinals pay the rest? The seems way too smart to be a Jets move
Man, I wouldnt mind the Rams signing him for that just to troll the Cards
 
JonRam99 said:
can he cover a TE?
we need a coverage ILB, with sideline speed, in the worst way.
Click to expand...
  • 2025/26 Status: Despite a 2024 dip, Okereke's overall performance remained high, with a 74.9 overall PFF grade, though his 2025 run defense dropped significantly.
  • 2023 Performance: He was highly rated, with a 82.5 PFF coverage grade, 6 forced incompletions, and 2 interceptions.
  • Elite Man Coverage: In 2023, he earned an 85.3 man coverage grade, ranking 5th in the NFL among linebackers with at least 100 snaps.
  • Efficiency: He allowed only 14.5 coverage snaps per reception in 2023, placing him 2nd among linebackers.
    X
    X +4
 
  • 3Like
  • High Five
Reactions: FaulkSF, RamFan503, JonRam99 and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back