Yeah, I see Young as a possibility but not Verse. Why would we sink our team build?Damn, Bryon Young yes, but Verse? I guess they play the same position, but Verse will be 26 this year and Garrett will be 31. Maybe the Rams just love trading guys with the name of Jared.
If Verse is in it, I'd only add one first rounder. He's still got two years on a rookie deal and is an excellent player.Have to admit, if the Rams include Verse, it makes their offer superior to all comers IMHO.
So if he does agree to get traded, he'll want more $$According to google...
Yes, Myles Garrett does have a no-trade clause in his contract.
As part of his record-breaking $160 million contract extension with the Cleveland Browns, the clause gives him complete veto power over any potential trade, allowing him to choose his destination or decline any deal he does not agree with
Nah, I bet he gives the Rams back 10 million for getting him out of Cleveland.So if he does agree to get traded, he'll want more $$
I see your point. I hated the Rudolph thing too. Still, gotta say, the thought of acquiring the best in the League at his position, and an IMPORTANT position, is positively intoxicating. Including either JV or BY mitigates the salary thing somewhat since we planned on paying one, if not both of them.Im not a huge Myles Garrett fan. The stuff with the Steelers QB soured me. Plus, I'm not a fan of acquiring anyone north of age 30
Im not a huge Myles Garrett fan. The stuff with the Steelers QB soured me. Plus, I'm not a fan of acquiring anyone north of age 30
I'm going to let myself to the door and let it hit me on the way out...Is... is... is your friend also looking to sell you swampland in Florida
Welp... nailed it. lolIf Verse is in it, I'd only add one first rounder. He's still got two years on a rookie deal and is an excellent player.
Boom..it’s official…just like I called it.Is... is... is your friend also looking to sell you swampland in Florida