We're a mere hours away from not having to speculate anymore !
We're a mere hours away from not having to speculate anymore !
That's less nerve wracking for me lolBut we're at least a day away from having to speculate what the second/third round picks are.
![]()
Don't think they have the draft capital to do that.This roster has very few holes. How about we take a WR at 13, then package a bunch of picks to move up an take Simpson at the bottom of the first? We have seven picks. We can eff a few away for our future QB.
I was paying attention but even after explaining why I said what I said, you still misinterpret it. Can't help you understand it further at this point. It isn't silly to talk about how Puka came in as a rookie and no one could have predicted how great he'd be. I'm simply talking about how no one can ever predict an impact any rookie can have on any team and simply used Puka as an example when he was a rookie. Aw wellI guess paying attention to what others actually said is tough to ask at this time of year.
Puka is irrelevant to what was said that started this little conversation. @DzRams had posted, "Snead said that it will be hard for any rookie to immediately contribute on this team..." So unless you are saying Puka is a rookie, it is silly to bring him in
You're talking about the consensus top player vs the most polarized player because of injury questions. Its ok, you just don't get it. I'm simply telling you I'm not going to waste time explaining why you're way off in my opinion, but hey do you. I'll just do this, who would everyone on this board rather draft if we had a choice, Love or Tyson?I think there's an argument for this.
One for which you haven't made.
You think you'd be able to do that if you thought that a guy falling or a player like Tyson taken before him was "retarded."
People on this board seem to have this problem with "not getting" you. The Puka discussion right now comes to mind.You're talking about the consensus top player vs the most polarized player because of injury questions. Its ok, you just don't get it. I'm simply telling you I'm not going to waste time explaining why you're way off in my opinion, but hey do you. I'll just do this, who would everyone on this board rather draft if we had a choice, Love or Tyson?
Wow, is that really your angle that "people" on this board don't get me? Tell me its not getting to you without saying its getting to you lol ....Sorry, but yes, in my eyes, it's retarded to draft a player with questions vs a clean prospect that is considered the best player. Like I said, stay doing you. Seeing eye to eye with every single post/poster is never going to happen and that's ok with me. Maybe you need to get comfortable with that reality?People on this board seem to have this problem with "not getting" you. The Puka discussion right now comes to mind.
I agree, I don't get calling Tyson going above Love "retarded."
You absolutely don't have to put the time in to explain. It's just a message board.
I misinterpreted your misinterpretationI was paying attention but even after explaining why I said what I said, you still misinterpret it. Can't help you understand it further at this point. It isn't silly to talk about how Puka came in as a rookie and no one could have predicted how great he'd be. I'm simply talking about how no one can ever predict an impact any rookie can have on any team and simply used Puka as an example when he was a rookie. Aw well
Forget it, it's El Chapo town, Jake.I misinterpreted your misinterpretation
Got it
We don't understand each other but whatever, I still like you ......now don't get any ideasI misinterpreted your misinterpretation
Got it
So, like listen to the audio and come to your own conclusions about the "buzz"