2026 Financials: Los Angeles Rams

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I dont see Stafford playing for another team, he may retire, but I just dont see anywhere that would give him a better shot at another ring. Would love to see him commit to at least 1 more season, but totally understand if he decides to retire and spend time with his family.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TXRams86
Not really, with 2 first round picks a 2nd and 3rd rounder, they would all slot higher than the 40 listed
Last year #13 pick 1st year cap hit was 4 mill, #29 pick 3.5 mill, figure another 3 mill for the 2nd and 3rd round pick, that 10.5 mill for 44 players and the last 7 even with rookies and low cost vets its another 5-6 mill
Spotrac says if they aren't replacing a player the rookie class at current picks is just under $17 million. And without players signed the rookie class takes us to the top 51.
 
Well if money was an issue last off-season, Stafford coming off of an MVP level season probably all but guarantees they'll need to renegotiate. Maybe the Rams are more comfortable this time around based on what they saw this year.
I agree the Rams want him to return. But given the way last offseason went there is undoubtedly a point where his expectations on compensation might not be compatible with what the Rams want to do. Hope we don't hit that point, but we'll see.
 
Stafford may want more money - but at this point in his career winning a super bowl would seem more of a motivating factor.

The two teams that tried to get him last year went 6-28.

He likely could still be deciding how he wants to approach this offs
Very true. I don't expect last year's drama. But I'm guessing a pay raise is coming. Next I'm wondering (they'll cross this bridge when they do) if Stafford is thinking year by year, or if he's looking for more of a 3 year extension.
 
I agree the Rams want him to return. But given the way last offseason went there is undoubtedly a point where his expectations on compensation might not be compatible with what the Rams want to do. Hope we don't hit that point, but we'll see.
I think this might come down to a years on the contract issue. You can tell Stafford loves playing football. I won't be surprised if he wants a multi year commitment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Merlin
As I think more and more about how McVay and Stafford approached the post game presser, I'm wondering if there was a sense that this might be his last rodeo. Stafford was rightfully pissed off, completely dismissed the question about whether he'd be coming back or not and McVay was ticked off to answer the question about him being back next season too. I really hope I'm wrong but the emotions, the things that were said wouldn't surprise me if they really needed this one for him before retiring. We were right there, a few plays away and we blew it. Each season is long and grueling (Stafford made it a point to hit on this in his interview) to get to that point and you have to wonder if Stafford wants to go through all that - especially after he played his heart out and the rest of the team let him down several times this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RamBall
Lot's of money to spend? What's the limit for signing Shaheed? Pay him whatever it takes to get him in here. He will do what the Rams thought Tutu would do when they drafted him. Plus he'd return punts and kickoffs.
 
Lot's of money to spend? What's the limit for signing Shaheed? Pay him whatever it takes to get him in here. He will do what the Rams thought Tutu would do when they drafted him. Plus he'd return punts and kickoffs.
He's a luxury as a special teams guy, but wow, maybe McVay could get even more out of him as WR? ChatGPT = "Analysts estimate his market value around 3 years, $46 million ($15.5 million per season) due to his elite performance as a returner and receiver."
 
If it was me, I'd make Avila play on that cheap 4th year of his contract and show me what he can do. If he plays well in 2026 then I'd sign him.
Puka, Young, Turner and Avila are all eligible for extensions. Not sure they're gonna extend all 4. Puka's a no brainer. Avila could be the odd man out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Merlin
Puka, Young, Turner and Avila are all eligible for extensions. Not sure they're gonna extend all 4. Puka's a no brainer. Avila could be the odd man out.

I don't extend Young. He will be thirty by the time his extension kicks in. Too much risk when it comes to that.

One of Avila or Dotson have to be extended. We cannot go into 2027 with two new guards and potentially a new center (as Shelton's contract is running out, too).
 
  • Like
Reactions: TXRams86
I don't extend Young. He will be thirty by the time his extension kicks in. Too much risk when it comes to that.

One of Avila or Dotson have to be extended. We cannot go into 2027 with two new guards and potentially a new center (as Shelton's contract is running out, too).
I agree, Young would be the odd man out. Our offensive line is too important to the success of our team. We've had success drafting defensive ends and while Young is good, I don't think he's irreplaceable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Memento
I agree Young should be the old man out... I think we also need to add size at DL also. Build from the inside out