Didn't realize we were short on Tight Ends..... Who knew?!?!?!!
View: https://x.com/TheRamsWire/status/1988297173709054113
"04 sets let's go wooooo!"
Didn't realize we were short on Tight Ends..... Who knew?!?!?!!
View: https://x.com/TheRamsWire/status/1988297173709054113
On a blow to a QB's head, intention is not required.I only saw what was shown on the Sunday Ticket telecast. Allen’s penalty was clearly intentional and obvious. To me Young’s penalty did not appear to be intentional or obvious…but I’m a biased Rams homer.
No. But you’d think it would need to be for a fine to be levied.On a blow to a QB's head, intention is not required.
Not sure I agree with that.No. But you’d think it would need to be for a fine to be levied.
That’s ok. But my personal view is that it should be egregious before it goes past being a penalty. That didn’t look intentional or egregious, so I don’t think it warranted a fine. It’s not like he speared him. It looked unintentional.Not sure I agree with that.
They would never activate both on game day, but it would be effective if they would let Karty kick his dirty kickoffs and let Mevis kick FGs. I am getting tired of kickoffs going to the 35 now. It might be worth the roster spot if you can pin teams inside the 20 on a regular basis. I know it really affected Philly in that game.As stupid as it sounds, I hope we keep both kickers throughout the year; and then let them fight in TC next year to see who wins the job for 2026. I don’t want another Dicker situation. Karty has talent. This new may too but it’s still TBD.
They would never activate both on game day, but it would be effective if they would let Karty kick his dirty kickoffs and let Mevis kick FGs. I am getting tired of kickoffs going to the 35 now. It might be worth the roster spot if you can pin teams inside the 20 on a regular basis. I know it really affected Philly in that game.
What the league wants is for there to be a real effort made to not have helmet to helmet contact. Unintentional to the league means the defender didn't even give it a thought. That is not acceptable. After having his pocket dipped into it will cross his mind at some point in future action.That’s ok. But my personal view is that it should be egregious before it goes past being a penalty. That didn’t look intentional or egregious, so I don’t think it warranted a fine. It’s not like he speared him. It looked unintentional.
Yup, all that is left is stripping them of helmets, strapping on flags and trying to pass it off as “football”.What the league wants is for there to be a real effort made to not have helmet to helmet contact. Unintentional to the league means the defender didn't even give it a thought. That is not acceptable. After having his pocket dipped into it will cross his mind at some point in future action.