OFFICIAL 2024 NFL News: Trades, cuts, free agency, and more

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Memento

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
18,324
Name
Jemma
Would prefer Joey Bosa (I really worry about Mack's effort level and age.), but if they go after Mack, I wouldn't complain too much.
 
OldSchool

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
40,533
Memento said:
Would prefer Joey Bosa (I really worry about Mack's effort level), but if they go after Mack, I wouldn't complain too much.
Click to expand...
With Bosa's injuries? Plus I think Mack will be cheaper to sign by a little bit.
 
Merlin

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,655
fanotodd said:
Easy there, Merlin. I was saying the same things about KW going into last season because he couldn’t get on the field when HIS rookie season—and the Rams stunk! There was no excuse other than he just must not get it.

All I’m saying is I learned my lesson last year. I’m gonna have to give ZE a second season to show out.
…but I still like the kid from Kentucky in this draft.
Click to expand...
Not counting him out. Just saying it would be foolish to build a plan around him. He's one of those guys on the roster right now who, if he steps up, you look even better off. But you don't want to set yourself up to rely on that.
 
Stl2La

Stl2La

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 23, 2014
Messages
3,940
Memento said:
Would prefer Joey Bosa (I really worry about Mack's effort level and age.), but if they go after Mack, I wouldn't complain too much.
Click to expand...
But you don’t worry about Bosa’s injury history? At least Mack can stay on the field lol
 
Memento

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
18,324
Name
Jemma
OldSchool said:
With Bosa's injuries? Plus I think Mack will be cheaper to sign by a little bit.
Click to expand...

Think Bosa's injury history would make him cheaper than Mack. But I prefer injuries over actual effort levels; it's why I've soured on Chase Young, and it's why I'm not sure about Mack. Mack looked not only bad, but completely disinterested last year.

Stl2La said:
But you don’t worry about Bosa’s injury history? At least Mack can stay on the field lol
Click to expand...

Even if the guy on the field isn't giving anything close to 100%?
 
Flatlyner

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Survivor Champion
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
4,669
Memento said:
Think Bosa's injury history would make him cheaper than Mack. But I prefer injuries over actual effort levels; it's why I've soured on Chase Young, and it's why I'm not sure about Mack. Mack looked not only bad, but completely disinterested last year.



Even if the guy on the field isn't giving anything close to 100%?
Click to expand...
For me, the dude can be reading a book on the field if he's as productive as Mack was last season.

18 sacks. 88 pressures. 59 Hurries. That is an edge that would look damn fine next to AD.
 
OldSchool

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
40,533
Memento said:
Think Bosa's injury history would make him cheaper than Mack. But I prefer injuries over actual effort levels; it's why I've soured on Chase Young, and it's why I'm not sure about Mack. Mack looked not only bad, but completely disinterested last year.



Even if the guy on the field isn't giving anything close to 100%?
Click to expand...
Bosa's name will offset the injury history reduction in cost. I want nothing to do with a guy that can't stay on the field. And you over valued Young anyways as we have talked about :)
 
WestCoastRam

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
6,241
blackbart said:
How are the Rams already up against a problem with the cap? I thought they sucked it up last year so they’d have a massive amount of cap space this year?? Even with the added cap $$$ they get 2 guards and a 2nd TE, WTF?????
Click to expand...
That's a lot!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom