OFFICIAL 2020 cuts, trades, and more

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
31,163
QtU9oN3.gif


View: https://i.imgur.com/eJbBUYC.png
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,203
I have to think the Browns are going to regret paying a RT that much money, but fortunately it's only a few years. :ROFLMAO:
 

Ram_Rally

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
6,196
Rams are doing the right thing right now. Let the bad teams overspend. Also, notice how it's been quiet for all of our free agents so far....
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,377
I have to think the Browns are going to regret paying a RT that much money, but fortunately it's only a few years. :ROFLMAO:

I wouldn't. They have a young franchise QB and need to get their OL right. Conklin has LT/RT versatility.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,377
Chris Jones says hi

He's one of a couple players in the running. But regardless of whether he's #2 or #3 or #4. He's in that conversation. The Colts gave up significantly less than what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,203
I wouldn't. They have a young franchise QB and need to get their OL right. Conklin has LT/RT versatility.
Yes he could be beaten on the left side you're correct. :D
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,203
He's one of a couple players in the running. But regardless of whether he's #2 or #3 or #4. He's in that conversation. The Colts gave up significantly less than what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack.
He's closer to top 10 than he is top 2. But yes it was a good deal for the Colts too, and they had a huge need on their DL.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,377
Yes he could be beaten on the left side you're correct. :D

Nah, dude. Way off on that assessment. He's a top 5 RT and a league average LT.

He's closer to top 10 than he is top 2. But yes it was a good deal for the Colts too, and they had a huge need on their DL.

Disagree. He's in the conversation for #2. Extremely disruptive.