10 Observations - Rams @ Eagles

[Jacobarch]

If this is truly the case, I apologize. Some people really do write similar to AI. It's just incredibly rare. There's one pattern that AI does constantly that you do as well and it stands out like a sore thumb. "It's not just x, it's y."

Even if it was AI that did the writing, it's obvious that someone intelligent and knowledgeable was guiding it.

But this doesn't happen, it's never 100% confident in AI detection if a human did all the writing.

Lol, tell you what I'll send you a zoom meeting request and let you watch my screen as I type out my 10 observations.

Here's a funny fact about AI flagging content or speech as AI because it's nothing more than a predictable algorithm

1. The Constitution / The Bible / Classic Literature Flagged as AI

• The Incident: Students and teachers frequently run historical texts, the U.S. Constitution, or classic literature (like Shakespeare or the Bible) through popular AI detectors like Turnitin or GPTZero out of curiosity. [1]
• Why it happens: Detectors measure perplexity (how predictable the next word is) and burstiness (how much sentence length varies). Because formal, rule-abiding, or well-structured English follows strict grammar patterns, the algorithm looks at centuries-old human writing and confidently declares, “Ah yes, this was generated by ChatGPT.”

 

[Ramit]

Lol, tell you what I'll send you a zoom meeting request and let you watch my screen as I type out my 10 observations.

Here's a funny fact about AI flagging content or speech as AI because it's nothing more than a predictable algorithm

1. The Constitution / The Bible / Classic Literature Flagged as AI

• The Incident: Students and teachers frequently run historical texts, the U.S. Constitution, or classic literature (like Shakespeare or the Bible) through popular AI detectors like Turnitin or GPTZero out of curiosity. [1]
• Why it happens: Detectors measure perplexity (how predictable the next word is) and burstiness (how much sentence length varies). Because formal, rule-abiding, or well-structured English follows strict grammar patterns, the algorithm looks at centuries-old human writing and confidently declares, “Ah yes, this was generated by ChatGPT.”

I should have never even said anything. It's not worth the effort. I do enjoy reading it either way. It's very obvious to anyone who uses AI regularly man. You're not Shakespeare, friend. I won't say anything else or reply to this thread again. Please keep producing your observations.