Watch your mouth:NFL wants to clean up sportsmanship,taunting/PD

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Watch your mouth: NFL wants to clean up sportsmanship, taunting
• By Jim Thomas

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/foot...cle_0c8e0536-80af-5c92-b34e-8b63a3e07bd7.html

In a league that covets competitive balance and offense, 2013 was a very good year for the NFL.

Five teams made the playoffs in 2013 that did not qualify in 2012, marking the 24th consecutive year that at least four new teams qualified for postseason play.

Eighteen games took place last season in which teams overcame at least a 14-point deficit to win, tying a single-season record set in 2011.

And 48 percent of the games in 2013 were decided by seven or fewer points, the fourth-highest percentage in league history.

In terms of offense, there were a combined 46.82 points scored per game, and 697 combined yards gained per game. Both are league records.

Even with those numbers, things didn’t get out of whack between offense and defense. To wit, the top five teams in total defense last season made the playoffs and all won at least 11 games. That would be Carolina, Cincinnati, New Orleans, San Francisco and Super Bowl champion Seattle.

So the overall state of the game never has been better on those fronts. But the state of sportsmanship, taunting, verbal abuse? Not so much.

As NFL owners, coaches, and club executives gather this week in Orlando, Fla., for the league’s annual March meetings. sportsmanship and player conduct will be a major topic of discussion. There were reports during the NFL scouting combine in late February that a rule would be proposed banning use of the “N-word” on the field or in the workplace.

Part of the impetus for this comes from the bullying scandal in Miami involving former Ram Richie Incognito and Jonathan Martin. But also, some games (See: Rams at Seattle) degenerated into trash-talking marathons.

But there will be no new rules passed on the subject. As Atlanta president Rich McKay and Rams coach Jeff Fisher pointed out during a competition committee conference call Wednesday, there already are provisions in the rule book to handle such things.

“We have the current rule — unsportsmanlike conduct, Rule 12, Section 3,” Fisher said. “It states that, ‘Using abusive, threatening or insulting language, or gestures to opponents, teammates, officials or representatives of the league is unsportsmanlike conduct.’’’

Fisher said that rule certainly applies to a couple of potential issues in the league at the moment.

“The ‘N-word’ would fall under that category,” he said.

“The officials will be empowered to call a foul if there are racial slurs or statements regarding another player’s sexual orientation, or even baiting and insulting with verbal abuse.”

Comments about sexual orientation could be an issue now that University of Missouri defensive end Michael Sam announced last month that he is homosexual, and as a result would be the league’s first openly-gay player.

Fisher said keeping such language and slurs off the field and out of the workplace in the NFL, “is going to be a very significant point of emphasis.”

Points of emphasis are things that the league’s officiating crews carefully monitor. More than a decade ago it was illegal contact by defensive backs on wide receivers.

The last couple of years, it has been blows to the head of quarterbacks and defenseless receivers.

This coming season, players need to watch their mouths. McKay pointed out that NFL vice president of officiating Dean Blandino and his office will take the time to educate players, coaches, officials and even the media on how the rule will be enforced this year.

“So that it is very clear,” McKay said. “It will be done in the spring when the officiating department goes on the road to see all of the clubs.”

Overall, Fisher said there have been indications of a decline in sportsmanship in the game recently.

“We have seen instances of taunting increase ever so slightly on the field,” Fisher said. “Those that are called and those that are not called. We recognize that we need to clean up a lot of the activity on the field as well.”

According to statistics relayed by McKay, Fisher’s statement that taunting is increasing “ever so slightly” is understatement. McKay said there were 34 penalties for taunting in 2013, almost a four-fold increase from the nine taunting calls in 2012.

All told there are a whopping 21 playing rule, bylaw, or resolution proposals up for discussion and potentially for vote at the owners’ meetings. Among them:

• Moving the kickoff to the 40-yard line (which would all but eliminate the kickoff return as part of the game).

• Making personal foul penalties subject to instant replay.

• Making the recovery of a loose ball in the field of play reviewable under instant replay.

• Allowing referees to consult with the NFL officiating department in New York during instant replay reviews.

• Eliminating overtime games in the preseason.

• Moving the line of scrimmage back to the 25-yard line on extra-point attempts.

• Expanding game-day rosters to 49 players for any game not played on a Sunday or Monday (with the exception of opening week).

• Expanding the practice squad roster to 10 players, from eight.

• Moving up the start of the trading period to two weeks before the start of the league year.

• Permitting more than one player to return from injured reserve to the active roster during the season.

There is no proposal per se to expand the number of teams in the playoffs from 12 to 14, but it will be discussed this week.
 

brokeu91

The super shrink
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
5,546
Name
Michael
To quote Shaft:

He's a bad mother (shut your mouth!)
 

Stranger

How big is infinity?
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
7,182
Name
Hugh
Change the language and u change behavior ..... Flag football here we come.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Well I see this as a step forward for football. For every guy who thinks it's fun to call another black guy a "nigga" there is one who doesn't like the idea at all.
 

Stranger

How big is infinity?
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
7,182
Name
Hugh
Well I see this as a step forward for football. For every guy who thinks it's fun to call another black guy a "nigga" there is one who doesn't like the idea at all.
Whether one refers to this as progress or regress, it's pretty much a done deal where this kind of change in language will take us. Pacifying the language used during the game will pacify the players and ultimately the game. Now, the consultants who have done the analysis regarding this change know this, so one has to ask oneself why the leadership behind the NFL would want to pacify what has been a successful formula for decades. Got any ideas?
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
That's a huge leap in logic, saying pacifying the language will pacify the players considering they have plenty of swear words they can use. You've just jumped a canyon in three leaps, which isn't sensibly possible.

You think not allowing players to use the word black or nigga or Seahawks or homo is going to alter the game and make the players more passive. I couldn't disagree more. All it means is they can't drop the N-word or call another player a Seahawks on the field during a game.

This type of rule has been in play and enforced in other sports and I bet you didn't know that. It's doen nothing to change or alter those sports.

I am certain that you've never been to an NBA game and sat near the basket based on this very brief conversation. You used to hear things that you wouldn't want your children saying in school. Now you don't. But it didn't change the game or how it's played.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
That's a huge leap in logic, saying pacifying the language will pacify the players considering they have plenty of swear words they can use. You've just jumped a canyon in three leaps, which isn't sensibly possible.

You think not allowing players to use the word black or nigga or Seahawks or homo is going to alter the game and make the players more passive. I couldn't disagree more. All it means is they can't drop the N-word or call another player a Seahawks on the field during a game.

This type of rule has been in play and enforced in other sports and I bet you didn't know that. It's doen nothing to change or alter those sports.

I am certain that you've never been to an NBA game and sat near the basket based on this very brief conversation. You used to hear things that you wouldn't want your children saying in school. Now you don't. But it didn't change the game or how it's played.

I for one have ALWAYS thought venom expressed verbally defused a lot of aggression,when I intend harm I usually go completely quiet ,I want to expend NO ENERGY screaming and hollering,I've always seen even the pre game raves NFL teams have as wasting valuable energy.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,905
Name
mojo
The place where they need to start cracking down on this language is in our elementary and Jr high schools. White kids calling white kids nigga,black kids calling black kids nigga,white kids calling black kids nigga and black kids calling white kids nigga. This derogatory word is like a rash that has somehow been morphed into common language. IMO it started as a "my boy", "my dude", my brother" connotation used by young adults...now our children have gotten a hold of it. I think its garbage.

Thats a whole other subject i realize.
 

Stranger

How big is infinity?
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
7,182
Name
Hugh
That's a huge leap in logic, saying pacifying the language will pacify the players considering they have plenty of swear words they can use. You've just jumped a canyon in three leaps, which isn't sensibly possible.

You think not allowing players to use the word black or nigga or Seahawks or homo is going to alter the game and make the players more passive. I couldn't disagree more. All it means is they can't drop the N-word or call another player a Seahawks on the field during a game.

This type of rule has been in play and enforced in other sports and I bet you didn't know that. It's doen nothing to change or alter those sports.

I am certain that you've never been to an NBA game and sat near the basket based on this very brief conversation. You used to hear things that you wouldn't want your children saying in school. Now you don't. But it didn't change the game or how it's played.
there's plenty of science to back me up. it's been well understood for decades.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
there's plenty of science to back me up. it's been well understood for decades.
One of the most violent men in the history of the NFL was a Godly man who I'm sure never uttered any such language,Reggie White. You don't have to be given to emotional jabber to be lethal.
Gutteral language adds nothing to the game and FWIW the focus upon it ONLY delays the action.
BTW as someone who has read TONS of behavioral "science" studies you can ONLY draw inferences,there is no hard "science" behind any of your contentions.
 

Stranger

How big is infinity?
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
7,182
Name
Hugh
One of the most violent men in the history of the NFL was a Godly man who I'm sure never uttered any such language,Reggie White. You don't have to be given to emotional jabber to be lethal.
Gutteral language adds nothing to the game and FWIW the focus upon it ONLY delays the action.
BTW as someone who has read TONS of behavioral "science" studies you can ONLY draw inferences,there is no hard "science" behind any of your contentions.
I guess you skipped over Pask.

By the way, we've got an entire society formulated around "my contentions". I don't see any logical reason why we won't see consistent outcomes on the football field. Yeah, we can have individual exceptions, but I'm talking about group behavior here.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
One of the most violent men in the history of the NFL was a Godly man who I'm sure never uttered any such language,Reggie White. You don't have to be given to emotional jabber to be lethal.
Gutteral language adds nothing to the game and FWIW the focus upon it ONLY delays the action.
BTW as someone who has read TONS of behavioral "science" studies you can ONLY draw inferences,there is no hard "science" behind any of your contentions.

The NFL is well behind the curve here, maybe because fans can't hear what is said on the field like they can in hoops or baseball and other sports. International sports as well as sports here in the USA don't allow this type of language and haven't for a long time. Why this is getting so much press with the NFL is beyond me. Ask any of the guys overseas and they will tell you that soccer matches have banned this ages ago.

This is just carry over from the neanderthal attitude that the game is being "sissified". Which has been the mantra from a vocal minority for over twenty years. If you look at rules changes from the last thirty years there are two things in common.

Safety of the players and helping the O score points.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
I guess you skipped over Pask.

By the way, we've got an entire society formulated around "my contentions". I don't see any logical reason why we won't see consistent outcomes on the football field. Yeah, we can have individual exceptions, but I'm talking about group behavior here.
So which of Pask's studies stated that if NFL players aren't allowed to call each other names society at large was going to lose it's right to free speech?