Try the Rams' cap on for size

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Howard Balzer
http://www.101sports.com/category/hbalz ... -for-Size/


[wrapimg=left]http://www.101sports.com/images/authors/medium/hbalzer.jpg[/wrapimg]With Monday the day when NFL teams can begin doling out franchise or transition tags, that is one decision the Rams won’t have to worry about.

The league year begins March 13 at 3 p.m. Central, not at midnight Eastern as it was for many years. By that day, all teams will have to be in compliance with the salary cap for their top 51 players under contract. Although the exact figure is being finalized, it will be very close to the $120.375 million total for 2011.

When the CBA was consummated in the chaotic summer last year, it was agreed that the cap number would basically be the same for two years. There is expected to be a significant jump in 2013, but for now, teams have to deal with the way it is.

However, the reality is that most teams will actually have a cap higher than the base number. Teams are able to roll into this year whatever cap dollars they had remaining at the end of 2011. In addition, there are other credits available.

For the Rams, what does that mean? They have carried over around $3.8 million from last year and have another $1.5 million available. Using the $120.375 million number, that will establish the Rams’ cap at about $125.675 million.

The team’s top 51 players currently account for around $110 million. However, that doesn’t include restricted free agents and exclusive-rights free agents that will receive tenders.

The Rams have 21 unrestricted free agents (UFA), a total that includes cornerback Al Harris, who has said he is retiring. The 20 UFAs are quarterbacks Kellen Clemens and A.J. Feeley, running backs Jerious Norwood and Cadillac Williams, wide receivers Mark Clayton and Brandon Lloyd, tight ends Billy Bajema and Stephen Spach, center Tony Wragge, guard Jacob Bell, tackle/guard Adam Goldberg, tackle Mark LeVoir, defensive tackle Gary Gibson, linebackers Chris Chamberlain, Bryan Kehl and Brady Poppinga, cornerbacks Rodf Hood and Justin King, safety James Butler and punter Donnie Jones.

They also have two restricted free agents (RFA) and six exclusive-rights free agents (ERFA).

Restricted are wide receiver Danny Amendola and defensive end C.J. Ah You. Last year, the lowest tender for RFAs was $1.2 million, which would result in compensation of the round the player was drafted in if he signed with a new team. There is no compensation if the player wasn’t drafted and he receives the minimum tender.

In 2011, the next tender was $1.8 million for compensation of a second-round pick and $2.6 million for a first-round pick. The highest tender, which would result in first- and third-round picks as compensation, no longer exists.

The tenders are expected to be close to the 2011 levels, although they could increase by around $100,000. Although Amendola is coming back from injury, it wouldn’t be surprising if the Rams put a second-round tender on him.

Ah You is another matter. He was a favorite of the previous coaching staff, and the current evaluation could be that his value is not at least $1.2 million. If he doesn’t receive a tender, Ah You would become a free agent. The minimum salary for a player with three credited seasons is $615,000.

Tenders for ERFAs are made at the minimum salary, based on credited seasons. In 2012, the minimum salaries are $390,000 for no credited seasons, $465,000 for one credited season and $540,000 for two credited seasons.

The Rams’ ERFAs are quarterback Tom Brandstater ($465,000), defensive tackle Jermelle Cudjo ($465,000), wide receiver Dominique Curry ($465,000), guard Bryan Mattison ($465,000), fullback Brit Miller ($540,000) and safety Darian Stewart ($540,000).

If each of those players are tendered, the total against the cap would be $2.94 million.

However, the Rams have 50 players under contract. Once they reach 51, any new player signed or tendered would then knock someone out of the top 51, thus reducing the net cap increase from the new contract. The Rams have nine players at $390,000 so an ERFA added at $465,000 for example would count only an extra $75,000 against the cap if one of those players departed the top 51.

Even if the Rams tender all eight RFAs and ERFAs, that should leave them between $12 and $13 million under their adjusted cap.

However, still to be accounted for is the rookie pool, which could be between $6.5 and $7.5 million depending on whether the Rams end up selecting at No. 2 overall in the first round or deal the pick.

What might the Rams do to create more cap space? Here are some potential options:

Center/guard Jason Brown: He has two years remaining on his contract with base salaries of $5 million and $6.2 million. This year, his cap figure is $7.2 million. If Brown were released prior to June 1, the Rams would save $5 million in salary, but $4.4 million in signing bonus proration would accelerate against the cap for a net savings of $2.8 million.

Defensive tackle Fred Robbins: He is entering the final year of his contract with a salary of $3.75 million and $250,000 of likely-to-be-earned incentives. He did not receive a signing bonus, so if released that would be a net savings of $4 million.

Tackle Jason Smith: There have been numerous reports that the Rams are trying to negotiate a pay cut for Smith, who has started just 26 of a possible 48 games since being the second overall pick in the draft in 2009. He missed the final 10 games of last season with the second serious concussion of his career. Smith’s base salary for 2011 is $10 million, $1 million of which is guaranteed. Including a signing bonus proration of $3.268 million, he counts $13.268 million against the cap.

If released on or before June 1, he would count slightly more than $10.8 million against the cap. That would save about $2.4 million, but does it make sense to give up on him? Smith has played well as a run blocker, but hasn’t been able to stay on the field for long stretches of time, except in 2010 when he started 15 games.

Would Smith agree to a pay cut to $4 or $5 million with the ability to make the lost money back based on games started? That would save the Rams between $8 and $9 million against the cap. In three years, he has been paid around $32 million for 26 starts.

Defensive end Chris Long: His contract was renegotiated last September to resolve a grievance, and that accounts for the cap dollars the Rams were able to roll into this year. The Rams saved about $4 million by reducing Long’s cap number.

Prior to the renegotiation, Long’s salary for 2011 was $11.335 million with a cap figure of $13.532 million and his salary for 2012 was $12.060 million with a cap number of $14.265. He received a $12.1 million signing bonus in September, and his 2011 base salary was lowered to $603,750 ($9.483 million cap) and his 2012 salary was lowered to $10.06 million, but his cap figure this year is $18.3 million.

This is the final year of his contract, so he’s likely to hit the bonus jackpot again. It’s possible a contract extension could occur that would lower the base salary for this year and result in some cap savings.

The reality, though, is that all the talk of a cap-room bonanza for the Rams this year simply wasn’t real.

The reality is that Long, Smith and Sam Bradford ($15.595 million) count a combined $47.17 million against the cap, which is 37.5 percent of the projected cap space. Include Steven Jackson ($8.899 million) and the total is $56.069 million/44.6 percent. Finally, the percentage for five players goes over 50 percent when Ron Bartell’s $7.663 million is factored in. Those five players have a total cap figure of $63.732 million, which is 50.7 percent of the expected cap.
 

libertadrocks

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
2,224
Slightly depressing assessment. Doesnt leave much room for high profile FAs, considering the number of needs we have.

Good thing we have a salary cap prodigy in the FO
 

Username

Has a Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,763
Further proof that the Rams had a franchise low at the worst possible time in the history of the NFL.
 

joeybittick

Rookie
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
417
Username said:
Further proof that the Rams had a franchise low at the worst possible time in the history of the NFL.

Yeah, I am happy we got Bradford, but shit, why couldn't the rookie wage scale have come a year earlier... or better yet, 2 or 3 years earlier?
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
joeybittick said:
Username said:
Further proof that the Rams had a franchise low at the worst possible time in the history of the NFL.

Yeah, I am happy we got Bradford, but shit, why couldn't the rookie wage scale have come a year earlier... or better yet, 2 or 3 years earlier?
Yeah, that really bugs me sometimes. Not so much that we overpaid, but that these unproven commodities were commanding a kajillion dollars before they had so much as sniffed an NFL field. Nothing against the guys we picked, because I certainly can't blame them for taking advantage of a broken system. Just, like everyone says, worst possible time to be a bad team.
 

joeybittick

Rookie
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
417
X said:
joeybittick said:
Username said:
Further proof that the Rams had a franchise low at the worst possible time in the history of the NFL.

Yeah, I am happy we got Bradford, but shit, why couldn't the rookie wage scale have come a year earlier... or better yet, 2 or 3 years earlier?
Yeah, that really bugs me sometimes. Not so much that we overpaid, but that these unproven commodities were commanding a kajillion dollars before they had so much as sniffed an NFL field. Nothing against the guys we picked, because I certainly can't blame them for taking advantage of a broken system. Just, like everyone says, worst possible time to be a bad team.

I still will never understand why the NFL veterans allowed that to go on for so long. Not everyone of them was a first round pick, so 90% never made real money (for an NFL player) until they were veterans. Basically that huge signing bonus being paid to a rookie took money out of their pockets.

I think the system is perfect now. Guys like Cam Newton are compensated quite well for being good enough in college to warrant the high pick, and if they prove it on the field, they will get that Bradford/Suh contract after a couple of seasons.
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,614
Yep, we picked a terrible time to stink it up. Funny that I just finished watching the 10 most snakebit NFL franchises in history, haha. Sam, Chris, Jason etc. have not earned their paychecks, that is for sure, but again, they can't be blamed for taking what was given. Would love to see them all restructure...especially Sam.
 

joeybittick

Rookie
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
417
Faceplant said:
Yep, we picked a terrible time to stink it up. Funny that I just finished watching the 10 most snakebit NFL franchises in history, haha. Sam, Chris, Jason etc. have not earned their paychecks, that is for sure, but again, they can't be blamed for taking what was given. Would love to see them all restructure...especially Sam.

I have seen that discussed elsewhere, and I am just curious where that idea has come from? Because, as far as I can tell, it is just wishful thinking on anyone but Smith, right?

I mean, Long could want an extension and that could save the Rams money in the short term, but why would Bradford restructure? I am not trying to attack anyone, btw, I could have missed something on this, that is why I am asking.

But Sam just signed that contract 2 seasons ago, and while he has not been all that great yet, he is in no ways a "bust". I would not even say he is underachieving, considering how long it takes for young QBs to develop coupled with the lack of supporting cast he has been given, the absolute disaster of a OC McDaniels was, injuries, short offseasons, and all of that shit.

So, given all of that, why are people suggesting Bradford will be asked to restructure? Do you guys mean that he will take a paycut close to what, say, a #1 overall pick gets in today's NFL? I cannot see even the remotest possibility he would do that, and why should he?

Or do you guys think he might just allow them to move some money around in the contract to lessen the hit this year? I am not sure how that works.

I am just curious where this idea comes from and if it has been written about or is even possible. Is it just message board discussion or could it really happen?
 

Anonymous

Guest
Okay let's spell it out.

They have about 15 M.

They have to spend let's say 20 on their rookie pool and extending guys (combined).

They gain 2.4 by cutting J.Smith (to me, it's simple: injuries)

They gain 4 by cutting Robbins (I like him but he was slowing down and hurt)

They could maybe gain up to 10 M for re-structuring and extending Long.

That leaves them around 11 M.

They can sign one High Market FA with that. Or 2 mid-market, Mikell-type deals.
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,614
joeybittick said:
Faceplant said:
Yep, we picked a terrible time to stink it up. Funny that I just finished watching the 10 most snakebit NFL franchises in history, haha. Sam, Chris, Jason etc. have not earned their paychecks, that is for sure, but again, they can't be blamed for taking what was given. Would love to see them all restructure...especially Sam.

I have seen that discussed elsewhere, and I am just curious where that idea has come from? Because, as far as I can tell, it is just wishful thinking on anyone but Smith, right?

I mean, Long could want an extension and that could save the Rams money in the short term, but why would Bradford restructure? I am not trying to attack anyone, btw, I could have missed something on this, that is why I am asking.

But Sam just signed that contract 2 seasons ago, and while he has not been all that great yet, he is in no ways a "bust". I would not even say he is underachieving, considering how long it takes for young QBs to develop coupled with the lack of supporting cast he has been given, the absolute disaster of a OC McDaniels was, injuries, short offseasons, and all of that shyte.

So, given all of that, why are people suggesting Bradford will be asked to restructure? Do you guys mean that he will take a paycut close to what, say, a #1 overall pick gets in today's NFL? I cannot see even the remotest possibility he would do that, and why should he?

Or do you guys think he might just allow them to move some money around in the contract to lessen the hit this year? I am not sure how that works.

I am just curious where this idea comes from and if it has been written about or is even possible. Is it just message board discussion or could it really happen?

This is just wishful thinking on my part. No way any of these guys are going to give back $ for the better of the team. Long is the only one that could help by agreeing to an extension, but does he even want to stay in St. Lou? If I had to guess, I would think he would want to test FA....
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #12
Faceplant said:
This is just wishful thinking on my part. No way any of these guys are going to give back $ for the better of the team. Long is the only one that could help by agreeing to an extension, but does he even want to stay in St. Lou? If I had to guess, I would think he would want to test FA....
I don't know about Long and free agency. Sure he'd probably like to test the waters to see what the asking price is, but I think ultimately he has a lot of ties to this team. With the advent of social media, you tend to see a lot of players establish really meaningful friendships with other players now. Long and Laurinaitis are like brothers now, and you have to think that all things being equal (or almost equal), Long would stay here if the compensation was close. If only to stay with the team that has his best bud.

Or that's all horseshit and he's like every other free agent. $$$$$$$$