Revisiting The Greatest Show On Turf

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Blue and Gold

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,741
Name
B and G
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/revisiting-the-greatest-show-on-turf/

upload_2014-9-23_17-10-46.png


ap9911140730-crop.jpg

St. Louis Rams quarterback Kurt Warner passes during the first quarter Sunday, Nov. 14, 1999, in St. Louis, Missouri.
ST. LOUIS RAMS 7:44 AM SEP 23, 2014

Revisiting The Greatest Show On Turf
By NEIL PAINE

Fifteen years ago, Mike Martz had a radical notion: “Why does the run have to set up the pass?”

That, according to Sports Illustrated’s Peter King, was the question the new St. Louis Rams offensive coordinator posed to his head coach, Dick Vermeil, as they prepared for the coming NFL season in June 1999. It was to be Vermeil’s third in St. Louis, and judging from the press clippings, probably his last if things didn’t change in a hurry.1 Over the previous two seasons, Vermeil had coached the Rams to 23 losses and only nine wins, with an offense that ranked 23rd out of 30 NFL teams in passing efficiency and 26th in scoring.

Then came Martz. “I don’t know of any assistant coach that came in, at any one time, in any one program, and made as big a contribution as Mike did at that time,” Vermeil said in a recent interview. In his estimation, Martz’s contribution to the Rams2 was equivalent to that of a first-round pick — and that’s not a hard case to make. Upon Martz’s arrival, the Rams went from laughingstocks to Super Bowl champs with an explosive attack that came to be known as the “Greatest Show on Turf.”

It was, at the time, the third-most potent scoring offense and the second-most efficient passing attack3 the league had seen in its modern incarnation.4And of even more historical significance, the Rams did it before the league became fixated on throwing the ball.

While the longtime mantra of football coaches everywhere had been to “establish the run” before passing, Martz’s plan was to aggressively pass the ball until the Rams had a lead worth protecting with the run. Stocked with speed everywhere and willing to throw in any situation, the Greatest Show on Turf proved that pass-first teams could win championships, and it heralded the passing fireworks we see in the NFL today.

“If you go back and look at the other teams of that era, the ‘conventional’ teams that you were competing with, [the Rams were] the aberration of the day,” said former Baltimore Ravens coach and current NFL Network analystBrian Billick, whose head-coaching debut came against the Rams in their 1999 regular-season opener. “St. Louis was so far ahead. It’s hard to say [they were] ‘pass-happy’ because they actually ran the ball pretty well,” he said. “But there’s no question they wanted to throw the ball.”

As Billick noted, St. Louis still could run effectively — running back Marshall Faulk racked up the NFL’s fifth-most rushing yards in 1999 — but that wasn’t the team’s focus. The Rams anticipated what statistical analysts would eventually come to learn about football: Teams run when they win; they don’t win when they run. After using all that passing to build early leads, St. Louis rushed on the league’s sixth-largest proportion of its second-half plays — and no team devoted more of its fourth-quarter plays to running the ball. Martz had successfully flipped conventional football wisdom on its head, using the pass to set up the run just as he had set out to do.

And ever since the Greatest Show on Turf hit the NFL scene, the league hastrended toward ever more (and more effective) passing, further enabled byrule changes designed to incentivize every team to spread the field and throw the ball aggressively.

paine-datalab-gsot-2.png


The genesis of the Rams’ aggressive strategy came when Martz was coaching quarterbacks for the Washington Redskins a year earlier. As ESPN analyst Ron Jaworski tells the story in his book “The Games That Changed The Game,” Martz realized that his pass-heavy third-down play packages were too effective to be confined to such a narrow situation.5 “Since we both love these plays so much,” Martz asked head coach Norv Turner, “why can’t we run them whenever we want? Why wait till third down?”

“So what happened was that we decided to run these third-and-long plays regardless of down and distance or field position,” Martz told Jaworski. “To us it simply didn’t matter anymore. This kept defenses guessing — they couldn’t zero in on our tendencies, personnel packages, or formations, because they’d always have to be ready for the big pass.”

Armed with such convention-breaking ideas, Martz represented the most revolutionary branch of the coaching tree originally planted by retired San Diego Chargers coach Don Coryell. Martz’s preferred offensive system, nicknamed “Air Coryell” for its emphasis on defense-stretching pass plays, wasn’t new; as the name implied, the system was first developed by Coryell in the 1960s at San Diego State, and later used to great effect at the NFL level by the Chargers of the early ’80s.6 But it had never been taken to the extremes Martz envisioned upon joining the Rams staff.

During the 1998 season, just three teams passed on more than 50 percent of their first-down plays.7 Running the West Coast Offense under coach Mike Holmgren, the Green Bay Packers threw in a league-high 57 percent of those situations — but gained an average of only 5.8 yards per attempt.8 This was an artifact of the West Coast’s philosophy, which had overtaken the league in the two decades since its creation by legendary coach Bill Walsh. Similar to Coryell’s scheme, Walsh’s offense emphasized passing over rushing, but it focused on stretching the field horizontally with short passes as a means of ball control. By contrast, Martz wanted to throw early and often, but also sought to stretch the field with deep passing.

“If you’ve got a Mercedes,” Martz said at the time, “you don’t keep it in the garage.”

After an offseason overhaul, the Rams possessed the football equivalent of German engineering under the hood. First, they signed accurate passer Trent Green9 to conduct Martz’s mad experiment from behind center. Then, capitalizing on a brewing contract dispute with the Indianapolis Colts, St. Louis heisted Faulk in a trade, giving up just a pair of draft picks for theleague’s best all-around running back. Days later, they used the sixth overall pick in the draft on Torry Holt, anticipating a productive pairing at wide receiver with former Pro Bowler Isaac Bruce returning from injury. Even the role players, such as second-year receiver Az-Zahir Hakim, had otherworldly speed.

Vermeil was already a longtime Air Coryell believer,10 and had been trying to install the offense in St. Louis for two years, but lacked the proper personnel. “We had the foundation of it, installed by [former offensive coordinator] Jerry Rhome, the first two years I was there,” Vermeil told me. “I had actually limited [the playbook’s] growth my second year there because we couldn’t complete in the high 60 percent of our throws. So I instructed people to cut back in the volume, hoping that we could improve the execution and the completion percentage.”

With Martz, Faulk, Bruce, Green and Holt in place, such cutbacks were no longer necessary. In the preseason of 1999, Green completed 28 of 32 passes (88 percent) before suffering a season-ending knee injury in the team’s third game. When unheralded backup Kurt Warner stepped in, Vermeil said, Martz and the coaching staff “made no adjustments” to the offensive scheme.

True to Vermeil’s expectations, Warner ended up completing 65.1 percent of his passes, which at the time was the third-best single-season completion percentage by any quarterback ever.11 In addition, the Rams came within striking distance of the 1989 San Francisco 49ers’ mark for the NFL’s second-most efficient passing offense since the merger12

More importantly, the Rams proved that a team could win without establishing the ground game before unleashing holy terror through the air. On first downs,13 St. Louis passed a league-high 59 percent of the time, and gained 7.6 yards per attempt on those throws (11 percent more than the NFL average on all attempts that year) and scored a touchdown on 7.4 percent of them (almost twice the league average across all attempts). On the whole, the Rams passed 5.4 percent more than would be expected from their +9.1average in-game scoring margin — still the biggest disparity by any Super Bowl winner since the merger.

paine-datalab-gsot-tables.png


“The spread-out type of system, it really did begin with them, because they were so explosive,” Billick told me. “It was a little bit different [from their contemporaries], but they were very successful with it. Kurt Warner made it work, and they spread you out in a way that very few teams could spread you out — that looks, today, very familiar.”

Although no one knew it at the time, the Rams were at the leading edge of something that was about to take over pro football. The NFL’s average passer rating in 1999 was 75.1 — essentially the same as it had been for a decade — and Warner’s 109.2 rate led the league by a mile. It was, at the time, thesecond-highest single-season mark ever. Within five years, though, the league-average rating had eclipsed 80.0 for the first time ever, with two players14 surpassing Warner’s rating from 1999. By last season, the average NFL passer rating was 84.1, with Warner’s 1999 mark dropping to 10th all time. Because of their sheer effectiveness, pass-first offensive philosophies have gone from the vanguard (see Coryell’s Chargers, or the various Run-and-Shoot teams of the ’90s) to commonplace over the last 15 years.

The conventional narrative is that Bill Belichick’s New England Patriotsfinally solved Martz’s offense in Super Bowl XXXVI, limiting the Rams to 17 points by making Faulk a non-factor. But St. Louis still moved the ball well in the loss, amassing 427 total yards while Faulk notched 130 yards from scrimmage.15 And after a disastrous 7-9 season in 2002, a reloaded version of the Greatest Show on Turf emerged behind another obscure QB (Marc Bulger) to tie for second in the NFL in scoring during the 2003 season.16 The true end came later, as the Rams’ talent scattered. Faulk retired in 2006, while Bruce, Holt and All-Decade left tackle Orlando Pace donned unfamiliaruniforms in their twilight years. Martz took his system to Detroit, San Francisco and Chicago, garnering mixed reviews when lesser talents were plugged in.

To the coaches, then, the Greatest Show on Turf was really about the perfect marriage of a high-powered strategy and a gifted roster.

“This game has been, is now, and always will be about talent,” Billick said. “Taking nothing away from the system, you’re talking about Hall of Famers like Marshall Faulk, Kurt Warner — who I believe will be in the Hall of Fame — the talents of an Isaac Bruce and Torry Holt … These were unique talents that the system adapted to very, very well.”

Vermeil concurred. “Very few teams ever have that kind of skill, at one time, on their side of the line of scrimmage,” he said.

It was those players who allowed Martz’s progressive game-planning to thrive, and it was his system that showcased their skills. His fingerprints can still be seen on the league 15 years later.

Thanks to Grantland’s Chris Brown for help with this article.

FOOTNOTES
article" in-tablet-append=".col-b" in-standard-append=".col-b > article" style="box-sizing: border-box; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; margin-bottom: 20px; border: 0px; font-family: inherit; font-size: 10px; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(147, 149, 152); text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 1px;">FILED UNDER DICK VERMEIL, FOOTBALL, GREATEST SHOW ON TURF, KURT WARNER, MIKE MARTZ, NFL, ST. LOUIS RAMS


NEIL PAINE @neil_paine
Neil Paine is a se
 

Blue and Gold

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,741
Name
B and G
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
Stats a little shaky. League-wide NFL passer rating in 1999 was 77.1. The average from 1990-99 was 77.3 There was a bump in 1994 and 1999 where for those two years combine it was about 79. That's when they disallowed so many of the big hits coming across the middle and allowed the big WRs to push of, like Irvin and Moore from Detroit.

From 1990 to 2013 here is league-wide NFL passer rating--really the jump was 2007 when he went to nearly 83.
77.3
76.2
75.3
76.7
78.4
79.2
76.9
77.2
78.3
77.1--1999
78.1
78.5
80.4
78.3
82.8
80.1
80.4
82.6
83.2
83.0
84.1
82.5
83.8
84.1---2013

So the increase was smaller than Paine led on
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,797
He might have looked at the median team or QB?
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,797
That's a lot of work . . . .means are easier to work with.

Nope, I see what he used now. Pro Football Reference has a league average that matches up to his. Not sure how you and it differ on the calculations.

Did you average all of the team's together or did you use a QB Rating calculator after taking all the league wide stats down?

That might be why it's different.
 

Blue and Gold

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,741
Name
B and G
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
Nope, I see what he used now. Pro Football Reference has a league average that matches up to his. Not sure how you and it differ on the calculations.

Did you average all of the team's together or did you use a QB Rating calculator after taking all the league wide stats down?

That might be why it's different.

No, I took the stats league-wide and applied the formula. However, I added back in sack yardage so it would be apples to apples with the individual ratings. So, if Warner were sacked 300 yards in a year, it does not come off his individual yardage total and is average yards per gain. Pro Football reference uses net yardage in their passer rating, the NFL Fact and Record Book does not and I do it the way the fact and record book does it. It's a small difference anyway, but Dr Z, many years ago suggested using net yardage for a defensive passer rating, but it's never been done. So, in 1999, using net passing yards the league passer rating was 75.1, using gross yardage it was 77.1
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,797
No, I took the stats league-wide and applied the formula. However, I added back in sack yardage so it would be apples to apples with the individual ratings. So, if Warner were sacked 300 yards in a year, it does not come off his individual yardage total and is average yards per gain. Pro Football reference uses net yardage in their passer rating, the NFL Fact and Record Book does not and I do it the way the fact and record book does it. It's a small difference anyway, but Dr Z, many years ago suggested using net yardage for a defensive passer rating, but it's never been done. So, in 1999, using net passing yards the league passer rating was 75.1, using gross yardage it was 77.1

Makes sense. Both of you are right then. Just different criteria. Yours is probably a bit more logical since a QB only has so much control over sacks.
 

Blue and Gold

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,741
Name
B and G
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
Well, I just go by how the NFL does it. There are people who have suggested changes, such as adding in sacks, and Qb fumbles, etc. But, as good a site as Pro Football Reference is, and it's great, they do have a few oddities. One example is the have Merlin Olsen moving to right defensive tackle in 1973-76, which of course, didn't happen. And there are countless examples, but then again, Rams media guide has errors--one example is Lucious Smith as a starting cornerback in 1982 . . . so, when dealing with stats, there will be mistakes. In this case, as you point out, they are right using PFR criteria.


BTW, if you want the Excel formular for doing passer rating here it is just make sure the attempts and completions and yards and TDs and INTs are in proper columns: =(IF((((F55/G55)*100)-30)/20<0,0,IF((((F55/G55)*100)-30)/20>2.375,2.375,(((F55/G55)*100)-30)/20))+IF(((K55/G55)*100)/5<0,0,IF(((K55/G55)*100)/5>2.375,2.375,((K55/G55)*100)/5))+IF((9.5-((L55/G55)*100))/4<0,0,IF((9.5-((L55/G55)*100))/4>2.375,2.375,(9.5-((L55/G55)*100))/4))+IF(((I55/G55)-3)/4<0,0,IF(((I55/G55)-3)/4>2.375,2.375,((I55/G55)-3)/4)))/0.06
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
Is anyone else completely in the dark about hotlinking and why it's theft?