I am with McVay on expanding the game day rosters. The tight limits don’t reward teams for finding late round picks, FA, and UDFAs to back up.
It doesn’t reward these backups by them being required to be inactive. They have no shot at live game action, and cannot show if they’ve improved, thus leading to future starting jobs. Which limits and pigeon holes them into a back up role and also makes it easier for a team to hide developing talent.
I get that the league wants parity but it’s a tough game. Do they want teams to essentially forfeit if a disaster occurs, like losing multiple players at one position? The Rams were down to one RB in Detroit. The Oline was hurting in Chicago. How does it make the game better by limiting the number of active players each week? Seems like backwards thinking.