Rams coach Jeff Fisher says running back split will continue/Wagoner

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Rams coach Jeff Fisher says running back split will continue
By Nick Wagoner

http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/12085/fisher-says-running-back-split-will-continue

EARTH CITY, Mo. -- The St. Louis Rams' running game had a solid outing last week against the Dallas Cowboys.

The Rams posted 121 yards on 30 carries, an average of 4.03 yards per carry. By no means is that up to the level the Rams want or need moving forward, but it at least represents major progress from what they did in Week 1 and a similar showing to what they did in Week 2.

What was more interesting about those rushing yards is how the Rams were divvying up the workload. Though Zac Stacy remained the leader amongst the team's backs in touches, he actually had an even split with Benny Cunningham when it comes to snaps. Stacy and Cunningham each played 34 snaps against the Cowboys, and undrafted rookie Trey Watts made his debut in the offense, appearing on seven plays.

Stacy looked more like his old self against the Cowboys, moving the pile consistently and spinning ahead for extra yards on his way to a 12-carry, 67-yard performance. He also had five catches for 54 yards.

Cunningham was less effective, adding nine carries for 29 yards and a catch for 5 more yards. Watts had five carries for 24 yards, getting a touch on nearly all of his snaps.

Clearly, Stacy is still getting the ball the most of the running backs, but given his success against the Cowboys, it's fair to wonder why he wasn't getting more work.

Asked about the playing time split amongst his backs Wednesday, Rams coach Jeff Fisher indicated it will continue.

"We’ll continue with that," Fisher said. "It’s even, but Zac gets going, gets on a roll he gets five or six straight carries or something like that, then you are going to flip them. We’ve always done that."

One would think that a back who gets on a roll would get a few more opportunities, especially in a game that remains close. That goes back to the idea of riding with the hot hand.

Moving forward, it would be good for the Rams to establish more of a rhythm, and if a back like Stacy or Cunningham or whoever seems to be rolling as Stacy was against the Cowboys, the workload should increase accordingly.
 

Sum1

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
3,604
I'd like to see more of Watts and get Mason on the active roster to get a few carries here and there. IMO Cunningham is backup and not a real change-of-pace type of back.
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
The Rams posted 121 yards on 30 carries, an average of 4.03 yards per carry. By no means is that up to the level the Rams want or need moving forward, but it at least represents major progress from what they did in Week 1 and a similar showing to what they did in Week 2.
Call me 'Nit-Picky' But if Wagoner is going to quote Stats , he should get it wright. It was 121 yards on 29 Carries, not 30 carries! But he's wright it's not were the Rams need to be moving forward!
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,657
I'd like to see more of Watts and get Mason on the active roster to get a few carries here and there. IMO Cunningham is backup and not a real change-of-pace type of back.
I don't see the point of activating Mason until he either learns to pass block or has some type of role on STs..
 

Sum1

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
3,604
I don't see the point of activating Mason until he either learns to pass block or has some type of role on STs..
For one, he very well could be a ST performer being the kick returner. And 2, I'd like to see him get a chance to run behind the starting line in a game that actually matters.

Mason was dominant in college on a major level. It'd be nice to see him get a shot. Our season seemed to turn around once we let Stacy play instead of Richardson (who flashed in a similar way his rookie year as what Cunningham did last year).

If the Rams were 3-0 and Cunningham was playing a big role I'd see no reason to mess with the depth chart...but the Rams are leaving a lot to be desired, and it isn't like Cunningham is coming in and stonewalling every would be tackler like he's Orlando Pace back there.

Sometimes it seems like we'd rather see a UDFA just be a solid player rather than see our draft picks excel.