Positives from Bengals Game

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Schmitzer

UDFA
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
87
A friendly reminder - the vent thread is open and available for ranting.

It wasn't as bad as the vent thread makes it out to be, of course. A number of positives in this game:
  • The Rams had his best 3rd down game in a while, converting 6/15, a very reasonable 40%.
  • He had 73 yards passing on 3rd down. Evenly spread among 4 quarters - no garbage yards to speak of.
  • Average distance to go on 3rd down was 7.7 yards. Shorter distance than Chi, Min, and Cle games. Longer than SF and Baltimore, though.
  • Foles had 3rd down completions of 16, 15, 14, and 12 yards. Easy to forget these.
  • I got what I asked for - Foles scrambled and tried to make a play on 3rd down rather than dumping it off for minimal gain. Of course, it turned into a pick 6. My bad. But overall, I'll take our 3rd down production compared to the previous 5 games.
  • Foles was 30/46 overall, his best of late.
  • Completions were made to 11 different receivers.
  • Austin was targeted 6 times, had 6 receptions. Tre Mason 7/7. We haven't seen a lot of this.
  • Got to see Manion and he looked fine. Don't care how good his numbers were, the defense was in prevent mode, but he looked the part.
  • Only 1 sack in the game. Remember we are playing 5th stringers in their 3rd positions of the year due to injuries.
  • Overall, we had equal number of 1st downs (19), only 31 fewer yards (346) and only 14 seconds less in time of possession than the Bengals. And this was with 3 turnovers.
All I'm saying is this game was better than the past 5 in many ways. I saw improvement in the passing game.
 

OntarioRam

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
3,175
Mason finally showed some flashes. Hopefully he builds on this and continues to be a valuable piece moving forward.

More third down completions.

If it was not obvious already, Tavon Ausin is the real deal.

Bradley Marquez had a few nice catches and continues to show lots of heart in his limited targets. In some respects, it's eerily similar to Bailey. Given Stedman's uncertain future right now, Marquez's emergence is welcome.

Britt continues to make some catches. He can definitely be improved upon, but continuity and knowing system has some value. Assuming we totally re-vamp things on offense this off season, I'm not convinced going with a WR corps full of rookies is a good thing. Having a vet or two is beneficial. I wouldn't mind Britt continuing to be that guy. Dating back to last year, he seems to get open deep a number of times only to be ignored by his QB. And his team mates seem to like him.
 

junkman

Farewell to all!
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
822
Name
junkman
Jared Cook played better. Only one dropped pass (from memory). Nice block on Austin's TD.

Hard to cull positives from this game. My ranting self wants to just say that the only positive is that the dumpser fire of a game is over. Except that I'm no longer looking forward to the next Rams game for fear of the next dumpster fire.
 

Schmitzer

UDFA
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
87
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
Jared Cook played better. Only one dropped pass (from memory). Nice block on Austin's TD.

Hard to cull positives from this game. My ranting self wants to just say that the only positive is that the dumpser fire of a game is over. Except that I'm no longer looking forward to the next Rams game for fear of the next dumpster fire.

Good point about Cook's block. I thought his 1st quarter drop lacked effort. The pass was behind him and he reached back with one hand instead of turning his body to the ball.
 

Ramlock

Here we f’n go, baby!
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
5,047
Name
Ramlock
All I'm saying is this game was better than the past 5 in many ways. I saw improvement in the passing game.


I saw that too....the details not noted by Thomas, Wagoner

An effort made to get the ball out quickly and help Foles complete some passes and OL didn't have to hold blocks

Throws across the middle, slants, crossers

Screen game was better

Wildcat was a twist not seen previously

Kinda offsets the narrative that all is crap
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
Lots of good....hmmm... I liked that Mannion played...I liked that Wichman played...Quick got some time...JJ got a pick....Nobody got hurt.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,473
Name
Dennis
The only positive I came away with was that it was 0-0 when the game started and the Patriots lost on Sunday Night.
 

RhodyRams

well hung member
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Moderator
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
11,794
my one postive:

spent the early part of the day Christmas shopping with and for the wife and went out for a nice lunch with some friends. Got home just in time to see the slaughter begin after halftime

 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,185
Name
Burger man
It's a tough season and difficult game to find positives, but I'll point out; despite an offensive line way down the depth chart, on the road, they've kept the false starts to a minimal.

I have been surprised by that, honestly.
 

Zombie Slayer

You are entitled to nothing.
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
935
Name
Dave
A huge reason the offensive stats were a little better is because the Bengals let off the gas in the second half. If they kept up the intensity the whole game I don't think we see those same numbers. One positive of the game is that there weren't any serious injuries. Well as far as I know.
 

FRO

Legend
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
5,308
This thread reminds me of things I tell myself when I look in the mirror trying to justify my poor appearance.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,185
Name
Burger man
This thread reminds me of things I tell myself when I look in the mirror trying to justify my poor appearance.

:LOL:

You have small ears and a great nose. You have small ears and a great nose. You have small ears and a great nose.
 

Robocop

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
1,933
Name
J.
putting sprinkles on a turd still makes it a turd. the fact this team has regressed this much from previous years with a BACKUP QB and no Todd Gurely is appalling. I'm sorry but none of that reflected the scoreboard or any progression on offense. wasn't Tavons big run off a pass? cus that's 60 plus yards right there that doesn't count for Foles
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,185
Name
Burger man
putting sprinkles on a turd still makes it a turd. the fact this team has regressed this much from previous years with a BACKUP QB and no Todd Gurely is appalling. I'm sorry but none of that reflected the scoreboard or any progression on offense. wasn't Tavons big run off a pass? cus that's 60 plus yards right there that doesn't count for Foles

"You can put sugar on a turd, and it will still taste like a turd".

I once said that in front of a very large group of senior people in my company.

I didn't get fired :sneaky: