Passing league? Top NFL teams utilize power-running schemes

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Bucky Brooks | NFL.com
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap20...ue-top-nfl-teams-utilize-powerrunning-schemes


The NFL has taken to the air recent years, with offensive coordinators exploiting favorable rules restricting contact on receivers downfield. Although the risk of turnovers/negative plays increases as quarterbacks drop back more and more, the presence of a potent passing game has helped several teams become competitive in a shootout-heavy league. Additionally, this pass-first approach coincided with the explosion of fantasy football to make observers view the quarterback and passing game as the most important elements of a championship offense.

Now, I certainly believe a big-time quarterback makes it easier to win games in the NFL, but a championship offense must be able to run the football, and run it with force to win in the postseason. This has been the winning formula throughout the years, and it remains the blueprint elite teams will use to chase the Lombardi Trophy in 2014.

Poring over statistics from the 2013 campaign, I found it interesting that nine of the top 12 teams in rushing attempts made the postseason. That's telling, as proponents of old-school football have always preached attempts over yardage when viewing the running game. Teams committed to the run will persistently pound the ball between the tackles to control the tempo of the game, wearing down a defense with punishing attempts. Additionally, the effective utilization of the running game will keep an offense out of long-yardage situations, reducing the risk of turnovers and negative plays in the passing game.

As I delved deeper into the All-22 Coaches Film from numerous games throughout the season, I discovered that championship-caliber teams not only pounded the rock with great regularity, but they ran out of power-based sets to increase their chances of consistently winning games. Here's why:

1) Running from power sets establishes a physical offensive identity.


For all of the conversation about the NFL transitioning into a passing league, the game boils down to physicality and toughness. The team that outhits the opponent routinely wins, particularly when imposing their will on the opposition at the line of scrimmage. Looking at the increased utilization of "22" personnel packages (2 RB, 2 TE, 1 WR) and jumbo sets, I believe more coaches are scheming to make the game a street fight at the line of scrimmage. By putting big bodies in tight formations with minimal splits, the offense neutralizes the effectiveness of gap-control defenses, giving blockers better angles at the point of attack. Additionally, offensive coordinators can implement wedge-like blocking schemes to create a push at the line of scrimmage. With a physical back to carry the ball, these power-based running schemes wear out opponents over the course of a game.

That's why the playoffs provided a hint at a trend that's emerging in the NFL. Teams like the Patriots,Seahawks, Saints and 49ers used a variety of power-based formations to effectively move the ball. Most importantly, this approach allowed the respective coaches to use complementary football strategies to control tempo, while keeping the defense rested and away from adverse situations. Given how these tactics significantly impacted postseason games, a return to power football makes sense for teams with strong defenses.

Studying tactics and schemes from last season's top contenders, I couldn't help but notice the prevalence of power packages with "22" or jumbo personnel. While most teams jump into those groupings/formations in short-yardage and goal-line situations, a handful of teams now use power packages to change the tempo of the game. Offensive coordinators are looking to make the game a matter of toughness and physicality. The schemes certainly aren't revolutionary, but they put the onus on defenders to step up, take on blocks and make solid tackles against hard-nosed running backs.

Let's take a look at the X's and O's of power football:

INSIDE ZONE

The zone-based blocking scheme is the preferred approach of most teams in the league, with offensive linemen assigned to block the first defender that appears on their designated tracks. The unit moves in unison to the direction of the play call, leaving the running back a choice of seams to attack when defenders jump out of their assigned gaps.

In the following screengrab, taken from the 49ers' Week 14 win over the rival Seahawks, San Francisco has 22 personnel on the field in a tight I-formation. The Seahawks have nine defenders in the box, but the zone-blocking scheme can handle this defensive tactic:

0ap2000000325129.jpg


At the snap, Gore takes the ball heading to the left B-gap. The 49ers' offensive linemen do an excellent job of "getting a hat on a hat," leaving Gore with plenty of room to blow through the second level:

0ap2000000325130.jpg


He weaves his way down the field for a 51-yard gain.

Click here for full video of the play.

In the next set of screengrabs, taken from the Patriots' Week 17 win over the Bills, New England is running an inside-zone play to the left out of 22 personnel. Anticipating a run, Buffalo has 10 defenders near the line of scrimmage:

0ap2000000325131.jpg


The extra defenders don't matter, as LeGarrette Blount takes the handoff heading to the left behind his lead blocker. The Patriots build a wall at the point of attack, creating a huge seam in the B-gap for Blount to exploit:

0ap2000000325132.jpg


Blount scoots down the boundary for a 35-yard score.

Click here for full video of the play.

WHAM BLOCK

The wham play features a unique blocking scheme typically utilized in run-heavy sets. The tactic requires a tight end or wingback to essentially trap an interior defender to create a seam in the middle. When executed correctly, this trap block leads to big gains from downhill runners.

In the screengrab below, taken from the 49ers' Week 4 rout of the Rams, San Francisco again is utilizing its 22 personnel, this time in a tight wing I-formation. The wingback is assigned to block the first defender past the center, with the fullback leading Gore through the hole. Notice how St. Louis is overshifted to the wingback, anticipating a run to the strong side:

0ap2000000325133.jpg


The wingback pulls around and through the A-gap, with the fullback clearing a path for Gore:

0ap2000000325134.jpg


The veteran back makes a nifty cut out of the back door and rumbles for 27 yards.

Click here for full video of the play.

POWER

Every offense in the NFL has the power in the playbook because it is the one play that embodies the toughness and physicality that this league is all about. The play assigns the backside guard to pull around and kick out the defender on the end of the line or lead through the hole to pick up the fast-flowing defender from the backside. The running back takes a jab step in the opposite direction to buy time for the pulling guard and fullback to hit the gap. With two blockers providing a convoy for the ball carrier, the defense is not only outnumbered at the point of attack, but linebackers are challenged to step up aggressively in the alley to fill the hole. Given the paucity of college teams running power-based offenses, most linebackers' lack of experience in taking on blockers is exposed with the power.

In the set of screengrabs below, taken from the Patriots' divisional-round massacre of the Colts, New England is running the power. The Colts have 10 defenders near the line of scrimmage to stop the run. The backside guard is assigned to pull around and kick out the first defender who shows up at the end of the line. Blount will take a jab step right before heading to the left:

0ap2000000325135.jpg


Despite the crowd of defenders at the line, the Patriots effectively put hats on defenders at the point of attack, leaving a crease for Blount on the interior:

0ap2000000325136.jpg


The hard-nosed running back slips to the outside and dashes for a 30-yard gain.

Click here for full video of the play.

COUNTER (JAB-O)

The counter and power are similar plays, but the footwork of the running back is a little more deliberate, to buy additional time for the pulling guard and fullback to create creases on the interior. The initial fake slows down the pursuit of linebackers, giving the guard and fullback better angles to kick out or seal (based on reactions) their assigned defenders. When executed properly, the combination of down blocks and pulls (or traps) creates huge seams in the middle of the defense. A patient runner with good vision and body control will attack those seams and churn out big gains -- even against a crowded box.

In the following screengrab, snatched from the Seahawks' Week 4 win over the Texans, Seattle breaks the huddle in 22 personnel, aligned in a strong I-wing formation to the right. The Texans have nine defenders in the box, with the safety crowding up on the tight end side anticipating a run to the strength of the formation:

0ap2000000325137.jpg


Lynch drifts to the right before heading left behind fullback Derrick Coleman through the B-gap:

0ap2000000325138.jpg


Coleman stones the linebacker in the hole, creating a crease for Lynch on the inside:

0ap2000000325139.jpg


The Pro Bowl back attacks the alley quickly and powers his way to a 17-yard gain on a perfectly blocked counter play.

Click here for full video of the play.

2) Playing in a phone booth curbs the potency of an eight-man front.

To effectively defend in the NFL, coaches must routinely craft strategies that add an additional player to the box to stop the run. In theory, this would put eight defenders in the box against two-back sets and seven defenders in the box against one-back formations. With the quarterback ignored as a runner, the extra defender is routinely the free hitter in the alley. Against jumbo sets, however, the numerical advantage is essentially nullified, with the split end or flanker replaced by an additional tight end or offensive tackle positioned at the end of the line. Part of this is due to the alignment of the wide receiver. Defensive coordinators are reluctant to leave a cornerback on an island (without safety help) against a talented pass catcher, so that pulls at least one defender away from the box. In addition, the presence of an extra offensive lineman positioned at the tight end spot creates a significant size and weight advantage at the point of attack.

This subtle tactic was reserved for savvy offensive coordinators in years past, but more and more teams are incorporating quasi-unbalanced lines to create a physical and numerical advantage at the line of scrimmage. The simple maneuver should be easy to defend -- the defense can just bump over to the direction of the heavy side -- but a misalignment or botched assignment results in a huge crease in the middle.

Looking at the screengrab below, pulled from the Saints' Week 16 loss to the Panthers, New Orleans breaks the huddle with jumbo personnel (2 RB, 1 TE, 6 OL) on the field. Tight end Ben Watson is aligned on the left, with the sixth offensive lineman positioned on the far right. The Panthers have eight defenders in the box, but safety Quintin Mikell is confused by the unbalanced alignment and running across the field to match up with Watson:

0ap2000000325140.jpg


With Mikell out of position due to the unbalanced line, the Saints successfully run the off-tackle play to the right against a vulnerable defensive front lacking a support safety:

0ap2000000325141.jpg


As a result, Mark Ingram posts a 34-yard gain on a simple power play from a run-heavy formation.

Click here for full video of the play.

In the screengrab below, taken from the Saints' blowout win over the Cowboys in Week 10, New Orleans sends its jumbo personnel on the field in a tight I-formation. Asshole Face has called an isolation run ("iso") to get his fullback isolated on the middle linebacker (Bruce Carter) in the hole:

0ap2000000325142.jpg


Ingram takes the handoff and heads to the A-gap. He reads the block of the fullback to determine whether to cut left or right:

0ap2000000325143.jpg


With Carter buried by the fullback's block, Ingram slips to the right for a 31-yard gain.

Click here for full video of the play.

In the next screengrab, snagged from the Seahawks' NFC Championship Game triumph over the 49ers, Seattle is aligned in tight trey formation with jumbo personnel (1 RB, 2 TE, 1 WR and 6 OL). San Francisco puts eight defenders in the box to stop the run:

0ap2000000325144.jpg


With an extra body at the line of scrimmage, the Seahawks are able to neutralize Patrick Willis in the middle:

0ap2000000325145.jpg


This creates an alley for Lynch on the cutback run:

0ap2000000325147.jpg


Click here for full video of the play.

Lynch indeed makes a nifty cut to slip out the back door and rumble for a 40-yard touchdown.

3) Undersized pass-rushing specialists leave NFL defenses vulnerable.

Executives and coaches reacted to the philosophical shift of the NFL to a passing league by drafting a bevy of swift-but-undersized pass rushers adept at getting after the quarterback. While speed and quickness are needed to effectively counter the quick-rhythm passing games employed by several offenses, the lack of big-bodied edge players leaves a defense susceptible to power runs directed between the tackles. Offensive coordinators exploit this dearth of size along defensive lines by utilizing multiple tight end sets and unbalanced lines with two running backs in the backfield.

It's simple: With offensive linemen and blocking tight ends tipping the scales at 275-plus pounds, power sets are advantageous against defenses featuring 250-pound athletes on the edges. The cumulative effect of fighting against bigger, stronger players on the perimeter overwhelms smallish defenders, leading to big gains on downhill running plays between the tackles. Factor in the poor tackling that plagues the NFL today, and a power-based offensive approach really presents problems for defenses across the league.

Follow Bucky Brooks on Twitter @BuckyBrooks.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
Thanks for the article! We all know that the NFL is a copycat league. It will be interesting to see how teams react in the draft and free agency to the Seahawks annihilation of the Broncos. Will we go back to "smash mouth" football? Probably not but there might be some rethinking going on. Run the ball and stop the run is a proven formula. Fisher went back to that mid-season and it seemed like it worked.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
Thanks for the article! We all know that the NFL is a copycat league. It will be interesting to see how teams react in the draft and free agency to the Seahawks annihilation of the Broncos. Will we go back to "smash mouth" football? Probably not but there might be some rethinking going on. Run the ball and stop the run is a proven formula. Fisher went back to that mid-season and it seemed like it worked.
Seems like we're caught between a rock and a hard place. They drafted and signed all these weapons for the offense, but then realized it was a running game that makes the offense click. Personally, I've always been a fan of smashmouth - be it offense or defense. I think if we pooled our resources and put together a top 5 offensive line, there isn't anything we couldn't accomplish. The talent is there at QB, RB and WR, but all of it is just an assemblage of potential if the line isn't good enough. That's not to say that it's not very good, mind you. The talent is there also with Long, Saffold, Dahl, Wells and Barksdale. We just need them to stay freaking healthy for once. I'm looking for depth on the line (which has been needed for years now), and I don't care how they do it. It just needs to be done.
 

RamsFan14

Starter
Joined
Dec 31, 2013
Messages
563
You're a smart man -X-, I got a test this Friday and I'm currently reading a textbook............... Might be a lil tired of reading... Just a little bit lol. :censored:
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
You're a smart man -X-, I got a test this Friday and I'm currently reading a textbook............... Might be a lil tired of reading... Just a little bit lol. :censored:
There's a test on this article Friday as well, so utilize your time wisely.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
Running the ball has never been a detriment ,but if it's all you can do, you still won't win without a top 5 defense.
The last time Denver won a Super Bowl ,wait the ONLY times Denver/Elway won a Super Bowl , they had a HOF running attack and a pretty good D ,I think if anyone decides to re discover the run it'll be them.

BTW this test you are giving Friday ,will it be open thread?????????????????????????????????
 

bluecollarram

Starter
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
780
Name
Dave
Great find X, I'm interested in what adjustments teams will make on D to combat these schemes.
 

Angry Ram

Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
17,894
You mean to tell me that teams that emphasize the running game get into the playoffs?

Yes, that's what I'm telling you.

And that running is just as important?

Yup.

And that teams that have no running game and no defense, who rely on the pass and 1 quarterback to do it usually aren't successful?

Pretty much.

So tell those "QB driven league" ass kissers to shut the hell up!"

0452_comedy_3_2-5209ac2406b02.jpeg
 

Ramrasta

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
3,116
Name
Tyler
I agree with this. If you can find success in the run game, you will have a much easier time when you pass. If you can stuff the run on defense, you force the opposing side to become one dimensional and it creates easy work for the D. The only real problem is that you can't afford to take a big deficit early and abandon the run like some teams unwisely do.
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
Seems like we're caught between a rock and a hard place. They drafted and signed all these weapons for the offense, but then realized it was a running game that makes the offense click. Personally, I've always been a fan of smashmouth - be it offense or defense. I think if we pooled our resources and put together a top 5 offensive line, there isn't anything we couldn't accomplish. The talent is there at QB, RB and WR, but all of it is just an assemblage of potential if the line isn't good enough. That's not to say that it's not very good, mind you. The talent is there also with Long, Saffold, Dahl, Wells and Barksdale. We just need them to stay freaking healthy for once. I'm looking for depth on the line (which has been needed for years now), and I don't care how they do it. It just needs to be done.
Draft another "hammer", you can probably get one at a bargain, or maybe even in FA, or UDFA. I'll keep saying this until I'm blue in the fingers.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #16
Draft another "hammer", you can probably get one at a bargain, or maybe even in FA, or UDFA. I'll keep saying this until I'm blue in the fingers.
Agreed. Memphis was banging the table hard last year for John Conner too. The joker TE idea was a novel one early on, but I think it's abundantly clear that we should quit messing around and just ram it down other team's throats now. Draw everyone in, and then play-action their asses off. If we had Bradford during that first (and especially second) Seattle game, we could have won them both. They learned quickly that all they had to do was log jam the middle and dare Clemens to beat them after Stacy racked up a mile of rushing yards the first time.