MNF: Lions at Packers

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,216
Name
Burger man
Monday Night Football: Detroit Lions vs. Green Bay Packers

The NFL's "Black and Blue" division takes center stage in the Week 6 edition of "Monday Night Football." The Green Bay Packers host the Detroit Lions at Lambeau Field with first-place implications in the NFC North Division at stake. A win for the Packers (4-1) gives them a stranglehold on the division, while a win for the Lions (2-1-1) would put them ahead by percentage points. The Lions have swept the Packers in each of the last two seasons.

Getting their first win in this series since 2016 won't be easy for the Packers. But they are eager to prove that the loss to Philadelphia last week was just a blip on the radar. As for the Lions, this is a must-win game for them as they are looking to return to the postseason. Both teams, however, come into this game with injury concerns.

Detroit at Green Bay

Kickoff: Monday, Oct. 14 at 8:15 p.m. ET
TV: ESPN
Spread: Packers -3.5

Three Things to Watch

1. Injury concerns on offense

Both teams are banged up on this side of the ball. The Packers are expecting to be without wide receiver Davante Adams (turf toe) again, which will be a huge blow to this offense. He is the team's leading pass catcher with 25 catches for 378 yards, and he's averaging 15 yards per reception. The team's second-leading receiver, Marquez Valdes-Scantling (17 receptions, 235 yards, 1 TD), is questionable with calf and hamstring injuries.

If both men are unable to go, then look for Aaron Rodgers to give more looks to tight end Jimmy Graham (12, 132, 2), and the team's No. 3 receiver, Geronimo Allison (10, 104, 2). They may also have to lean more on running back Aaron Jones (78 carries, 302 yards, 8 TDs). Rodgers continues to be lights out from the pocket, as he's completing 62 percent of his passes for 1,307 yards and six touchdowns. The Packers are averaging close to 25 points per game.

For the Lions, it's rookie tight end T.J. Hockenson (concussion) and wide receiver Danny Amendola (chest) who are listed as questionable. If both men are unable to go, then the Lions will lose a combined 22 receptions for 307 yards and three scores. If that's the case, then Matthew Stafford (62.4 completion percentage, 1,122 yards, 9 TDs) will throw extra passes to receivers Kenny Golladay and Marvin Jones Jr., who have combined for 37 catches for 520 yards and five touchdowns. Running back Kerryon Johnson (74 carries, 251 yards, 1 TD) had his first 100-yard game of the season last week against Kansas City. If the Lions are shorthanded in the passing game, then they may need Johnson to reach the century mark again.

2. Defense could decide the game

The Packers are eighth in the league in points allowed per game (18.6), they're tied for sixth in sacks (15), and they're second in interceptions (7). And while the Lions are giving up over 400 yards per game, they have been able to generate a pass rush at times (9 sacks), and they're able to occasionally force turnovers (8 takeaways). This game may come down to a big stop in the end.

3. By the numbers

The Lions may currently own a four-game winning streak over the Packers, but since 2010 the Packers own a 10-8 series lead, with five of those wins coming at home. Before this current streak, the Lions hadn't swept the Packers since 1988.

Final Analysis

Even with the injuries, the Packers still have more firepower than the Lions do, and they have a better defense. It'll be a close game, but Green Bay will find a way to break this losing streak against Detroit.

Prediction: Packers 27, Lions 24
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,216
Name
Burger man
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
I think this could be a real good game.

(y)
 

Q729

Legend
Joined
Dec 28, 2014
Messages
12,144
I'm going for Lions. And fun flea flicker to start off. Then bad exchange to follow up.
Edit: And then it ends just like that.
 

FaulkSF

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
5,459
Name
FaulkSF
Watching the left guard of the Packers, Jenkins. The Rams could have taken him in the 2nd. Played in a zone blocking scheme.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,972
Name
mojo
I need 8 more points from Prater tonight. He's off to a good start but a 50+ FG and a few more extra points would be nice.
 

FaulkSF

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
5,459
Name
FaulkSF
Interesting that Detroit is mostly relying on a four man rush and dropping back in coverage.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,051
.

So now they see hands to the face. And it wasn't even that. Stupid refs.

.
 

MadGoat

Mathematically alive
Joined
Jul 31, 2016
Messages
1,909
ESPN announcer's contemplating why officiating is getting worse. For some answers, let's go to the NFL official we hired away from his job.
 

Da-Rock

Pro Bowler
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
1,035
Wow! What a shit show from the Refs....this will be the first time I will say that the Refs cost a team a win and it was the Home Team they did it for......that was really bad!
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,972
Name
mojo
Yeah lets keep looking for that ghost call on replay, Hey there's a Packer OLiner giving out a facemask. Shhhh...nothing to see here move along. Game over!
 

Raptorman

Pro Bowler
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
1,122
Name
David
Wow! What a shit show from the Refs....this will be the first time I will say that the Refs cost a team a win and it was the Home Team they did it for......that was really bad!
You don't know how bad. When you go back and look at it today. The Packers won. Did the refs change the outcome? More than likely. At least 6 calls or non-calls went the Packers way. At least 5 of them had scoring implications.